Cargando…

Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019

INTRODUCTION: The initial International Conference on Population and Development in 1994 contains the first reference to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights (SRHR). It has been considered agreed language on SRHR in future United Nations (UN) documents. However, opposition to SRHR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilby, Lynda, Koivusalo, Meri, Atkins, Salla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004659
_version_ 1783672836072669184
author Gilby, Lynda
Koivusalo, Meri
Atkins, Salla
author_facet Gilby, Lynda
Koivusalo, Meri
Atkins, Salla
author_sort Gilby, Lynda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The initial International Conference on Population and Development in 1994 contains the first reference to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights (SRHR). It has been considered agreed language on SRHR in future United Nations (UN) documents. However, opposition to SRHR in global forums has increased, including in conjunction with an increase in religious, far-right populist politics. This study provides an empirical analysis of UN documents to discover whether opposition to SRHR has resulted in changes in the language on SRHR between and what these changes are. METHODS: This is a qualitative policy analysis in which 14 UN resolutions, 6 outcome documents from the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) and 522 country and group statements and 5 outcome reports from the Commission on Population and Development were collected from the organisations websites from 2014 to 2019. Framework analysis was used. The text from documents was charted and indexed and themes developed from these. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a disappearance of the language on abortion in the CSW outcome documents from 2017 and a change in the language on comprehensive sexuality education in the CSW as well as the UN General Assembly resolutions from 2018. This change included a removal of ‘sexuality’ to an increased emphasis on the role of families. Furthermore, documents showed an inability of some states to accept any mention of sexual and reproductive health at all, expanding from the usual contestations over abortion. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the global shift in politics and anti-SRHR actors at UN negotiations and conferences have removed previously agreed on language on SRHR from future UN resolutions and outcome documents. This is a concern for the global realisation of SRHR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8009211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80092112021-04-16 Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019 Gilby, Lynda Koivusalo, Meri Atkins, Salla BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: The initial International Conference on Population and Development in 1994 contains the first reference to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights (SRHR). It has been considered agreed language on SRHR in future United Nations (UN) documents. However, opposition to SRHR in global forums has increased, including in conjunction with an increase in religious, far-right populist politics. This study provides an empirical analysis of UN documents to discover whether opposition to SRHR has resulted in changes in the language on SRHR between and what these changes are. METHODS: This is a qualitative policy analysis in which 14 UN resolutions, 6 outcome documents from the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) and 522 country and group statements and 5 outcome reports from the Commission on Population and Development were collected from the organisations websites from 2014 to 2019. Framework analysis was used. The text from documents was charted and indexed and themes developed from these. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a disappearance of the language on abortion in the CSW outcome documents from 2017 and a change in the language on comprehensive sexuality education in the CSW as well as the UN General Assembly resolutions from 2018. This change included a removal of ‘sexuality’ to an increased emphasis on the role of families. Furthermore, documents showed an inability of some states to accept any mention of sexual and reproductive health at all, expanding from the usual contestations over abortion. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the global shift in politics and anti-SRHR actors at UN negotiations and conferences have removed previously agreed on language on SRHR from future UN resolutions and outcome documents. This is a concern for the global realisation of SRHR. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8009211/ /pubmed/33781994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004659 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gilby, Lynda
Koivusalo, Meri
Atkins, Salla
Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title_full Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title_fullStr Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title_full_unstemmed Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title_short Global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? Analysis of United Nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
title_sort global health without sexual and reproductive health and rights? analysis of united nations documents and country statements, 2014–2019
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004659
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbylynda globalhealthwithoutsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsanalysisofunitednationsdocumentsandcountrystatements20142019
AT koivusalomeri globalhealthwithoutsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsanalysisofunitednationsdocumentsandcountrystatements20142019
AT atkinssalla globalhealthwithoutsexualandreproductivehealthandrightsanalysisofunitednationsdocumentsandcountrystatements20142019