Cargando…
Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study
BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but recent studies have raised doubts whether all COPD patients will benefit from ICS. This study evaluates in a real-life setting the effects of ICS withdrawal in patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33814904 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S294217 |
_version_ | 1783672853901606912 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Anne Orholm Hilberg, Ole Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Kristensen, Steffen Helmer Frølund, Jannie Christina Langkilde, Pernille Kølholt Løkke, Anders |
author_facet | Nielsen, Anne Orholm Hilberg, Ole Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Kristensen, Steffen Helmer Frølund, Jannie Christina Langkilde, Pernille Kølholt Løkke, Anders |
author_sort | Nielsen, Anne Orholm |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but recent studies have raised doubts whether all COPD patients will benefit from ICS. This study evaluates in a real-life setting the effects of ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD. METHODS: The study was a prospective intervention study following patients with COPD for 6 months after abrupt withdrawal of ICS. FEV1 (L), blood eosinophilic count (x10E9/L) and number of exacerbations were measured at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after ICS withdrawal. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (56 females (57.4%), mean age 70 years (51–94 years)) with COPD were included in the study. Eleven patients were excluded during the study period (7 patients died, 4 patients withdrew their consent during the study period). During the 6 months, 51 patients (60%) had resumed treatment with ICS, of whom 34 patients (68%) experienced an exacerbation during follow-up. No significant decline in FEV1 was seen in this group between baseline and after 6 months (ΔFEV1 0.07 L, p = 0.09). In the remaining 34 patients (40%) without ICS after 6 months of follow-up, 15 patients (44.1%) experienced an exacerbation. No significant decline was seen in FEV1 at baseline and after 6 months (ΔFEV1 0.04 L, p = 0.28). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age (70.5 vs 69.6 years, p = 0.53), nor between FEV1 at baseline (0.96 L vs 1.00 L, p = 0.63) or eosinophilic count (0.25 x10E9/L vs 0.17 x10E9/L, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Abrupt withdrawal of ICS was possible in some patients. However, more than half of the patients resumed ICS during follow-up. Based on results from our study we were not able to foresee – from neither history of exacerbations nor eosinophilic count – whom will be able to manage without ICS and who will resume treatment with ICS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8009342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80093422021-04-01 Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study Nielsen, Anne Orholm Hilberg, Ole Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Kristensen, Steffen Helmer Frølund, Jannie Christina Langkilde, Pernille Kølholt Løkke, Anders Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but recent studies have raised doubts whether all COPD patients will benefit from ICS. This study evaluates in a real-life setting the effects of ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD. METHODS: The study was a prospective intervention study following patients with COPD for 6 months after abrupt withdrawal of ICS. FEV1 (L), blood eosinophilic count (x10E9/L) and number of exacerbations were measured at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after ICS withdrawal. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (56 females (57.4%), mean age 70 years (51–94 years)) with COPD were included in the study. Eleven patients were excluded during the study period (7 patients died, 4 patients withdrew their consent during the study period). During the 6 months, 51 patients (60%) had resumed treatment with ICS, of whom 34 patients (68%) experienced an exacerbation during follow-up. No significant decline in FEV1 was seen in this group between baseline and after 6 months (ΔFEV1 0.07 L, p = 0.09). In the remaining 34 patients (40%) without ICS after 6 months of follow-up, 15 patients (44.1%) experienced an exacerbation. No significant decline was seen in FEV1 at baseline and after 6 months (ΔFEV1 0.04 L, p = 0.28). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age (70.5 vs 69.6 years, p = 0.53), nor between FEV1 at baseline (0.96 L vs 1.00 L, p = 0.63) or eosinophilic count (0.25 x10E9/L vs 0.17 x10E9/L, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Abrupt withdrawal of ICS was possible in some patients. However, more than half of the patients resumed ICS during follow-up. Based on results from our study we were not able to foresee – from neither history of exacerbations nor eosinophilic count – whom will be able to manage without ICS and who will resume treatment with ICS. Dove 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8009342/ /pubmed/33814904 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S294217 Text en © 2021 Nielsen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nielsen, Anne Orholm Hilberg, Ole Jensen, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Kristensen, Steffen Helmer Frølund, Jannie Christina Langkilde, Pernille Kølholt Løkke, Anders Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with COPD – A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with copd – a prospective observational study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33814904 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S294217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenanneorholm withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT hilbergole withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT jensenjensulrikstæhr withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kristensensteffenhelmer withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT frølundjanniechristina withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT langkildepernillekølholt withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT løkkeanders withdrawalofinhaledcorticosteroidsinpatientswithcopdaprospectiveobservationalstudy |