Cargando…
How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genotyped with arrays, have become a widely used marker type in population genetic analyses over the last 10 years. However, compared to whole genome re-sequencing data, arrays are known to lack a substantial proportion of globally rare variants and tend to be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245178 |
_version_ | 1783672870868615168 |
---|---|
author | Geibel, Johannes Reimer, Christian Weigend, Steffen Weigend, Annett Pook, Torsten Simianer, Henner |
author_facet | Geibel, Johannes Reimer, Christian Weigend, Steffen Weigend, Annett Pook, Torsten Simianer, Henner |
author_sort | Geibel, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genotyped with arrays, have become a widely used marker type in population genetic analyses over the last 10 years. However, compared to whole genome re-sequencing data, arrays are known to lack a substantial proportion of globally rare variants and tend to be biased towards variants present in populations involved in the development process of the respective array. This affects population genetic estimators and is known as SNP ascertainment bias. We investigated factors contributing to ascertainment bias in array development by redesigning the Axiom(™) Genome-Wide Chicken Array in silico and evaluating changes in allele frequency spectra and heterozygosity estimates in a stepwise manner. A sequential reduction of rare alleles during the development process was shown. This was mainly caused by the identification of SNPs in a limited set of populations and a within-population selection of common SNPs when aiming for equidistant spacing. These effects were shown to be less severe with a larger discovery panel. Additionally, a generally massive overestimation of expected heterozygosity for the ascertained SNP sets was shown. This overestimation was 24% higher for populations involved in the discovery process than not involved populations in case of the original array. The same was observed after the SNP discovery step in the redesign. However, an unequal contribution of populations during the SNP selection can mask this effect but also adds uncertainty. Finally, we make suggestions for the design of specialized arrays for large scale projects where whole genome re-sequencing techniques are still too expensive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8009414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80094142021-04-07 How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias Geibel, Johannes Reimer, Christian Weigend, Steffen Weigend, Annett Pook, Torsten Simianer, Henner PLoS One Research Article Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genotyped with arrays, have become a widely used marker type in population genetic analyses over the last 10 years. However, compared to whole genome re-sequencing data, arrays are known to lack a substantial proportion of globally rare variants and tend to be biased towards variants present in populations involved in the development process of the respective array. This affects population genetic estimators and is known as SNP ascertainment bias. We investigated factors contributing to ascertainment bias in array development by redesigning the Axiom(™) Genome-Wide Chicken Array in silico and evaluating changes in allele frequency spectra and heterozygosity estimates in a stepwise manner. A sequential reduction of rare alleles during the development process was shown. This was mainly caused by the identification of SNPs in a limited set of populations and a within-population selection of common SNPs when aiming for equidistant spacing. These effects were shown to be less severe with a larger discovery panel. Additionally, a generally massive overestimation of expected heterozygosity for the ascertained SNP sets was shown. This overestimation was 24% higher for populations involved in the discovery process than not involved populations in case of the original array. The same was observed after the SNP discovery step in the redesign. However, an unequal contribution of populations during the SNP selection can mask this effect but also adds uncertainty. Finally, we make suggestions for the design of specialized arrays for large scale projects where whole genome re-sequencing techniques are still too expensive. Public Library of Science 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8009414/ /pubmed/33784304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245178 Text en © 2021 Geibel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Geibel, Johannes Reimer, Christian Weigend, Steffen Weigend, Annett Pook, Torsten Simianer, Henner How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title | How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title_full | How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title_fullStr | How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title_full_unstemmed | How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title_short | How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias |
title_sort | how array design creates snp ascertainment bias |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geibeljohannes howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias AT reimerchristian howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias AT weigendsteffen howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias AT weigendannett howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias AT pooktorsten howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias AT simianerhenner howarraydesigncreatessnpascertainmentbias |