Cargando…

Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!

[Image: see text] In this work, we have computed the exfoliation energy (the energy required to separate a single layer from the bulk structure), the interlayer distance, and the thermodynamic state functions for representative layered inorganic minerals such as Brucite, Portlandite, and Kaolinite,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cutini, Michele, Maschio, Lorenzo, Ugliengo, Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00149
_version_ 1783672888559140864
author Cutini, Michele
Maschio, Lorenzo
Ugliengo, Piero
author_facet Cutini, Michele
Maschio, Lorenzo
Ugliengo, Piero
author_sort Cutini, Michele
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In this work, we have computed the exfoliation energy (the energy required to separate a single layer from the bulk structure), the interlayer distance, and the thermodynamic state functions for representative layered inorganic minerals such as Brucite, Portlandite, and Kaolinite, while leaving the more classical 2D transition-metal dichalcogenides (like MoS(2)) for future work. Such materials are interesting for several applications in the field of adsorption and in prebiotic chemistry. Their peculiar features are directly controlled by the exfoliation energy. In materials without cations/anions linking different layers, the interactions keeping the layers together are of weak nature, mainly dispersion London interactions and hydrogen bonds, somehow challenging to deal with computationally. We used Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional theory (DFT) approaches focusing on the role of dispersion forces using the popular and widespread Grimme’s pairwise dispersion schemes (-D2 and -D3) and, as a reference method, the periodic MP2 approach based on localized orbitals (LMP2). The results are highly dependent on the choice of the scheme adopted to account for dispersion interactions. D2 and D3 schemes combined with either HF or DFT lead to overestimated exfoliation energies (about 2.5 and 1.7 times higher than LMP2 data for Brucite/Portlandite and Kaolinite) and underestimated interlayer distances (by about 3.5% for Brucite/Portlandite). The reason is that D2 and D3 corrections are based on neutral atomic parameters for each chemical element which, instead, behave as cations in the considered layered material (Mg, Ca, and Al), causing overattractive interaction between layers. More sophisticated dispersion corrections methods, like those based on nonlocal vdW functionals, many body dispersion model, and exchange-hole dipole moment not relying on atom-typing, are, in principle, better suited to describe the London interaction of ionic species. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that good results can be achieved also within the simpler D2 and D3 schemes, in agreement with previous literature suggestions, by adopting the dispersion coefficients of the preceding noble gas for the ionic species, leading to energetics in good agreement with LMP2 and structures closer to the experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8009511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80095112021-03-31 Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion! Cutini, Michele Maschio, Lorenzo Ugliengo, Piero J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] In this work, we have computed the exfoliation energy (the energy required to separate a single layer from the bulk structure), the interlayer distance, and the thermodynamic state functions for representative layered inorganic minerals such as Brucite, Portlandite, and Kaolinite, while leaving the more classical 2D transition-metal dichalcogenides (like MoS(2)) for future work. Such materials are interesting for several applications in the field of adsorption and in prebiotic chemistry. Their peculiar features are directly controlled by the exfoliation energy. In materials without cations/anions linking different layers, the interactions keeping the layers together are of weak nature, mainly dispersion London interactions and hydrogen bonds, somehow challenging to deal with computationally. We used Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional theory (DFT) approaches focusing on the role of dispersion forces using the popular and widespread Grimme’s pairwise dispersion schemes (-D2 and -D3) and, as a reference method, the periodic MP2 approach based on localized orbitals (LMP2). The results are highly dependent on the choice of the scheme adopted to account for dispersion interactions. D2 and D3 schemes combined with either HF or DFT lead to overestimated exfoliation energies (about 2.5 and 1.7 times higher than LMP2 data for Brucite/Portlandite and Kaolinite) and underestimated interlayer distances (by about 3.5% for Brucite/Portlandite). The reason is that D2 and D3 corrections are based on neutral atomic parameters for each chemical element which, instead, behave as cations in the considered layered material (Mg, Ca, and Al), causing overattractive interaction between layers. More sophisticated dispersion corrections methods, like those based on nonlocal vdW functionals, many body dispersion model, and exchange-hole dipole moment not relying on atom-typing, are, in principle, better suited to describe the London interaction of ionic species. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that good results can be achieved also within the simpler D2 and D3 schemes, in agreement with previous literature suggestions, by adopting the dispersion coefficients of the preceding noble gas for the ionic species, leading to energetics in good agreement with LMP2 and structures closer to the experiments. American Chemical Society 2020-07-01 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8009511/ /pubmed/32609519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00149 Text en Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cutini, Michele
Maschio, Lorenzo
Ugliengo, Piero
Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title_full Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title_fullStr Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title_full_unstemmed Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title_short Exfoliation Energy of Layered Materials by DFT-D: Beware of Dispersion!
title_sort exfoliation energy of layered materials by dft-d: beware of dispersion!
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32609519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00149
work_keys_str_mv AT cutinimichele exfoliationenergyoflayeredmaterialsbydftdbewareofdispersion
AT maschiolorenzo exfoliationenergyoflayeredmaterialsbydftdbewareofdispersion
AT ugliengopiero exfoliationenergyoflayeredmaterialsbydftdbewareofdispersion