Cargando…

Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the plasma cell-related hematological malignancies exceeding 10.0% of all marrow cells, and they make a paraprotein that is a marker of the disease. Myeloma is one of the most common types of hematological malignancies in humans. Genetic bio-markers have been used for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikbal Atli, E, Gurkan, H, Onur Kirkizlar, H, Atli, E, Demir, S, Yalcintepe, S, Kalkan, R, Demir, AM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816073
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjmg-2020-0020
_version_ 1783672901243764736
author Ikbal Atli, E
Gurkan, H
Onur Kirkizlar, H
Atli, E
Demir, S
Yalcintepe, S
Kalkan, R
Demir, AM
author_facet Ikbal Atli, E
Gurkan, H
Onur Kirkizlar, H
Atli, E
Demir, S
Yalcintepe, S
Kalkan, R
Demir, AM
author_sort Ikbal Atli, E
collection PubMed
description Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the plasma cell-related hematological malignancies exceeding 10.0% of all marrow cells, and they make a paraprotein that is a marker of the disease. Myeloma is one of the most common types of hematological malignancies in humans. Genetic bio-markers have been used for prognostic markers in patients diagnosed with MM. The genetic and genomic changes have been identified using karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), next generation sequencing (NGS), specifically whole-genome sequencing or exome sequencing. Circulatory plasma cells, circulating free DNA (cfD-NA) and microRNAs (miRNAs) comprised in liquid biopsy are potentially used in diagnosis/prognosis of MM. In this study, we analyzed and compared results of karyo-typing, FISH and NGS in 35 MM cases. Diagnostic strategies are expanding rapidly and newly developed NGS-based testing may help the understanding of the complexities of genetic alterations in karyotypically normal cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8009570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80095702021-04-02 Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma Ikbal Atli, E Gurkan, H Onur Kirkizlar, H Atli, E Demir, S Yalcintepe, S Kalkan, R Demir, AM Balkan J Med Genet Original Article Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the plasma cell-related hematological malignancies exceeding 10.0% of all marrow cells, and they make a paraprotein that is a marker of the disease. Myeloma is one of the most common types of hematological malignancies in humans. Genetic bio-markers have been used for prognostic markers in patients diagnosed with MM. The genetic and genomic changes have been identified using karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), next generation sequencing (NGS), specifically whole-genome sequencing or exome sequencing. Circulatory plasma cells, circulating free DNA (cfD-NA) and microRNAs (miRNAs) comprised in liquid biopsy are potentially used in diagnosis/prognosis of MM. In this study, we analyzed and compared results of karyo-typing, FISH and NGS in 35 MM cases. Diagnostic strategies are expanding rapidly and newly developed NGS-based testing may help the understanding of the complexities of genetic alterations in karyotypically normal cases. Sciendo 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8009570/ /pubmed/33816073 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjmg-2020-0020 Text en © 2020 Ikbal Atli E, Gurkan H, Onur Kirkizlar H, Atli E, Demir S, Yalcintepe S, Kalkan R, Demir AM, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ikbal Atli, E
Gurkan, H
Onur Kirkizlar, H
Atli, E
Demir, S
Yalcintepe, S
Kalkan, R
Demir, AM
Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title_full Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title_short Pros and Cons for Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization, Karyotyping and Next Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Multiple Myeloma
title_sort pros and cons for fluorescent in situ hybridization, karyotyping and next generation sequencing for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816073
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjmg-2020-0020
work_keys_str_mv AT ikbalatlie prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT gurkanh prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT onurkirkizlarh prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT atlie prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT demirs prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT yalcintepes prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT kalkanr prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma
AT demiram prosandconsforfluorescentinsituhybridizationkaryotypingandnextgenerationsequencingfordiagnosisandfollowupofmultiplemyeloma