Cargando…
Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts
Research suggests that scientists based at prestigious institutions receive more credit for their work than scientists based at less prestigious institutions, as do scientists working in certain countries. We examined the extent to which country- and institution-related status signals drive such dif...
Autores principales: | Nielsen, Mathias Wullum, Baker, Christine Friis, Brady, Emer, Petersen, Michael Bang, Andersen, Jens Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734086 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64561 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies
por: Brady, Emer, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
por: Helmer, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid
por: Andersen, Fredrik, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Peer-Led Education Expedites Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors for Appropriate Veterans
por: Bowman, Mary H.
Publicado: (2020) -
Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige
por: Andersen, Jens Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2019)