Cargando…

Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients

BACKGROUND: This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings—with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure—in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Prospective interventional cohort study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazurok, Vadim, Kasherininov, Igor, Bautin, Andrey, Kulemina, Olga, Rzheutskaya, Ryta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617809
_version_ 1783672935088652288
author Mazurok, Vadim
Kasherininov, Igor
Bautin, Andrey
Kulemina, Olga
Rzheutskaya, Ryta
author_facet Mazurok, Vadim
Kasherininov, Igor
Bautin, Andrey
Kulemina, Olga
Rzheutskaya, Ryta
author_sort Mazurok, Vadim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings—with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure—in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg(−1), RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (“conventional ventilation”). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min (“reduced RR ventilation”). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg(−1), RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH(2)O (“low Vt-high PEEP ventilation”). RESULTS: Patients in the “low Vt-high PEEP” ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during “reduced RR” ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO(2) elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated. CONCLUSIONS: In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg(−1) and PEEP 10 cm H(2)O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO(2) and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg(−1) and PEEP 5 cmH(2)O. New and Noteworthy. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8009731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80097312021-04-14 Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients Mazurok, Vadim Kasherininov, Igor Bautin, Andrey Kulemina, Olga Rzheutskaya, Ryta Crit Care Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: This study compared the hemodynamic effects and gas exchange under several different ventilator settings—with regard to tidal volume, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pressure—in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Prospective interventional cohort study with a controlled group in a single cardiosurgical ICU involving 119 patients following on-pump CABG surgery. During the 1st postoperative hour, the intervention group patients were ventilated with Vt 10 ml × kg(−1), RR 14/min, PEEP 5 cmH(2)O (“conventional ventilation”). During the 2nd hour, RR was reduced to 8/min (“reduced RR ventilation”). At 3 hrs, Vt was decreased to 6 ml × kg(−1), RR returned to 14/min, and PEEP increased to 10 cmH(2)O (“low Vt-high PEEP ventilation”). RESULTS: Patients in the “low Vt-high PEEP” ventilation period showed significantly lower alveolar ventilation and thoraco-pulmonary compliance than during “reduced RR” ventilation. Mean airway pressure and Vds/Vt peaked during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation; however, driving pressure was lower. Vt decrease and PEEP increase did not lead to oxygenation improvement and worsened CO(2) elimination. Hemodynamically, the study revealed significant cardiac output decrease during low Vt-high PEEP ventilation. In 23.2% of patients, catecholamine therapy was initiated. CONCLUSIONS: In postoperative cardiosurgical patients, MV with Vt 6 ml × kg(−1) and PEEP 10 cm H(2)O is characterized by worsened oxygenation and elimination of CO(2) and a less favorable hemodynamic profile than ventilation with Vt 10 ml × kg(−1) and PEEP 5 cmH(2)O. New and Noteworthy. (i) Patients after CABG may be especially sensitive to low tidal volume and increased PEEP as it negatively affects hemodynamic profile by means of the right heart preload decrease and afterload increase. (ii) Mechanical ventilation settings aiming to minimize mean airway pressure reduce the negative effects of positive inspiratory pressure and are favorable for hemodynamics. Hindawi 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8009731/ /pubmed/33859842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617809 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vadim Mazurok et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mazurok, Vadim
Kasherininov, Igor
Bautin, Andrey
Kulemina, Olga
Rzheutskaya, Ryta
Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title_full Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title_fullStr Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title_full_unstemmed Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title_short Heart-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Postoperative Cardiosurgical Patients
title_sort heart-protective mechanical ventilation in postoperative cardiosurgical patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617809
work_keys_str_mv AT mazurokvadim heartprotectivemechanicalventilationinpostoperativecardiosurgicalpatients
AT kasherininovigor heartprotectivemechanicalventilationinpostoperativecardiosurgicalpatients
AT bautinandrey heartprotectivemechanicalventilationinpostoperativecardiosurgicalpatients
AT kuleminaolga heartprotectivemechanicalventilationinpostoperativecardiosurgicalpatients
AT rzheutskayaryta heartprotectivemechanicalventilationinpostoperativecardiosurgicalpatients