Cargando…
Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86532-4 |
_version_ | 1783672951794565120 |
---|---|
author | Śpiewak, Mateusz Kłopotowski, Mariusz Kowalik, Ewa Kubik, Agata Ojrzyńska-Witek, Natalia Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Joanna Michalak, Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Gawor, Monika Kożuch, Katarzyna Miłosz-Wieczorek, Barbara Grzybowski, Jacek Bilińska, Zofia Witkowski, Adam Klisiewicz, Anna Marczak, Magdalena |
author_facet | Śpiewak, Mateusz Kłopotowski, Mariusz Kowalik, Ewa Kubik, Agata Ojrzyńska-Witek, Natalia Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Joanna Michalak, Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Gawor, Monika Kożuch, Katarzyna Miłosz-Wieczorek, Barbara Grzybowski, Jacek Bilińska, Zofia Witkowski, Adam Klisiewicz, Anna Marczak, Magdalena |
author_sort | Śpiewak, Mateusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk according to the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator when MWT measured using echocardiography was changed to MWT measured using MRI. All consecutive patients with HCM who underwent cardiac MRI were included. MWT measured with echocardiography and MRI were compared, and 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator was computed using four different models. The final population included 673 patients [389 (57.8%) males, median age 50 years, interquartile range (36–60)]. The median MWT was lower measured by echocardiography than by MRI [20 (17–24) mm vs 21 (18–24) mm; p < 0.0001]. There was agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the measurement of maximal LV wall thickness in 96 patients (14.3%). The largest differences between echo and MRI were − 13 mm and + 9 mm. The differences in MWT by echocardiography and MRI translated to a maximal difference of 8.33% in the absolute 5-year risk of SCD, i.e., the echocardiography-based risk was 8.33% lower than the MRI-based estimates. Interestingly, 13.7% of patients would have been reclassified into different SCD risk categories if MRI had been used to measure MWT instead of echocardiography. In conclusion, although there was high general intermodality agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the MWT measurements, the differences in MWT translated to significant differences in the 5-year risk of SCD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8009882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80098822021-04-01 Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging Śpiewak, Mateusz Kłopotowski, Mariusz Kowalik, Ewa Kubik, Agata Ojrzyńska-Witek, Natalia Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Joanna Michalak, Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Gawor, Monika Kożuch, Katarzyna Miłosz-Wieczorek, Barbara Grzybowski, Jacek Bilińska, Zofia Witkowski, Adam Klisiewicz, Anna Marczak, Magdalena Sci Rep Article In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk according to the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator when MWT measured using echocardiography was changed to MWT measured using MRI. All consecutive patients with HCM who underwent cardiac MRI were included. MWT measured with echocardiography and MRI were compared, and 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator was computed using four different models. The final population included 673 patients [389 (57.8%) males, median age 50 years, interquartile range (36–60)]. The median MWT was lower measured by echocardiography than by MRI [20 (17–24) mm vs 21 (18–24) mm; p < 0.0001]. There was agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the measurement of maximal LV wall thickness in 96 patients (14.3%). The largest differences between echo and MRI were − 13 mm and + 9 mm. The differences in MWT by echocardiography and MRI translated to a maximal difference of 8.33% in the absolute 5-year risk of SCD, i.e., the echocardiography-based risk was 8.33% lower than the MRI-based estimates. Interestingly, 13.7% of patients would have been reclassified into different SCD risk categories if MRI had been used to measure MWT instead of echocardiography. In conclusion, although there was high general intermodality agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the MWT measurements, the differences in MWT translated to significant differences in the 5-year risk of SCD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8009882/ /pubmed/33785804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86532-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Śpiewak, Mateusz Kłopotowski, Mariusz Kowalik, Ewa Kubik, Agata Ojrzyńska-Witek, Natalia Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, Joanna Michalak, Ewa Mazurkiewicz, Łukasz Gawor, Monika Kożuch, Katarzyna Miłosz-Wieczorek, Barbara Grzybowski, Jacek Bilińska, Zofia Witkowski, Adam Klisiewicz, Anna Marczak, Magdalena Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86532-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiewakmateusz suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kłopotowskimariusz suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kowalikewa suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kubikagata suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT ojrzynskawiteknatalia suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT petrykamazurkiewiczjoanna suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT michalakewa suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT mazurkiewiczłukasz suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT gawormonika suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT kozuchkatarzyna suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT miłoszwieczorekbarbara suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT grzybowskijacek suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT bilinskazofia suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT witkowskiadam suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT klisiewiczanna suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT marczakmagdalena suddencardiacdeathriskinhypertrophiccardiomyopathycomparisonbetweenechocardiographyandmagneticresonanceimaging |