Cargando…
A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial
AIMS: A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.23.BJO-2020-0178 |
_version_ | 1783672954812366848 |
---|---|
author | Flett, Lydia Adamson, Joy Barron, Elizabeth Brealey, Stephen Corbacho, Belen Costa, Matthew L. Gedney, Graham Giotakis, Nikolaos Hewitt, Catherine Hugill-Jones, Jessica Hukins, Deborah Keding, Ada McDaid, Catriona Mitchell, Alex Northgraves, Matthew O'Carroll, Grace Parker, Adwoa Scantlebury, Arabella Stobbart, Lynne Torgerson, David Turner, Emma Welch, Charlie Sharma, Hemant |
author_facet | Flett, Lydia Adamson, Joy Barron, Elizabeth Brealey, Stephen Corbacho, Belen Costa, Matthew L. Gedney, Graham Giotakis, Nikolaos Hewitt, Catherine Hugill-Jones, Jessica Hukins, Deborah Keding, Ada McDaid, Catriona Mitchell, Alex Northgraves, Matthew O'Carroll, Grace Parker, Adwoa Scantlebury, Arabella Stobbart, Lynne Torgerson, David Turner, Emma Welch, Charlie Sharma, Hemant |
author_sort | Flett, Lydia |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: The two treatments being compared are the most commonly used for this injury, however there is uncertainty over which is most clinically and cost-effective. The Articular Pilon Fracture (ACTIVE) Trial is a sufficiently powered and rigorously designed study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of adults with this injury. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):150–163. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8009896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80098962021-04-01 A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial Flett, Lydia Adamson, Joy Barron, Elizabeth Brealey, Stephen Corbacho, Belen Costa, Matthew L. Gedney, Graham Giotakis, Nikolaos Hewitt, Catherine Hugill-Jones, Jessica Hukins, Deborah Keding, Ada McDaid, Catriona Mitchell, Alex Northgraves, Matthew O'Carroll, Grace Parker, Adwoa Scantlebury, Arabella Stobbart, Lynne Torgerson, David Turner, Emma Welch, Charlie Sharma, Hemant Bone Jt Open Foot & Ankle AIMS: A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: The two treatments being compared are the most commonly used for this injury, however there is uncertainty over which is most clinically and cost-effective. The Articular Pilon Fracture (ACTIVE) Trial is a sufficiently powered and rigorously designed study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of adults with this injury. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):150–163. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8009896/ /pubmed/33663229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.23.BJO-2020-0178 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Foot & Ankle Flett, Lydia Adamson, Joy Barron, Elizabeth Brealey, Stephen Corbacho, Belen Costa, Matthew L. Gedney, Graham Giotakis, Nikolaos Hewitt, Catherine Hugill-Jones, Jessica Hukins, Deborah Keding, Ada McDaid, Catriona Mitchell, Alex Northgraves, Matthew O'Carroll, Grace Parker, Adwoa Scantlebury, Arabella Stobbart, Lynne Torgerson, David Turner, Emma Welch, Charlie Sharma, Hemant A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title | A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: Protocol for the ACTIVE randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults: protocol for the active randomized controlled trial |
topic | Foot & Ankle |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.23.BJO-2020-0178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flettlydia amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adamsonjoy amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barronelizabeth amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brealeystephen amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT corbachobelen amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT costamatthewl amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gedneygraham amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT giotakisnikolaos amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hewittcatherine amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hugilljonesjessica amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hukinsdeborah amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kedingada amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcdaidcatriona amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mitchellalex amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT northgravesmatthew amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ocarrollgrace amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkeradwoa amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scantleburyarabella amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stobbartlynne amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT torgersondavid amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT turneremma amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT welchcharlie amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sharmahemant amulticentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT flettlydia multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adamsonjoy multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barronelizabeth multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brealeystephen multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT corbachobelen multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT costamatthewl multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gedneygraham multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT giotakisnikolaos multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hewittcatherine multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hugilljonesjessica multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hukinsdeborah multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kedingada multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcdaidcatriona multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mitchellalex multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT northgravesmatthew multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ocarrollgrace multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkeradwoa multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scantleburyarabella multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stobbartlynne multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT torgersondavid multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT turneremma multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT welchcharlie multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sharmahemant multicentrerandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheclinicaleffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofexternalframeversusinternallockingplateforcompletearticularpilonfracturefixationinadultsprotocolfortheactiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |