Cargando…

Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest

Environmental and psychological stressors can adversely affect astronaut cognitive performance in space. This study used a 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR) paradigm to simulate some of the physiologic changes induced by microgravity. Twenty-four participants (mean ± SD age 33.3 ± 9.2 years, N = 16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basner, Mathias, Dinges, David F., Howard, Kia, Moore, Tyler M., Gur, Ruben C., Mühl, Christian, Stahn, Alexander C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.643854
_version_ 1783672972560564224
author Basner, Mathias
Dinges, David F.
Howard, Kia
Moore, Tyler M.
Gur, Ruben C.
Mühl, Christian
Stahn, Alexander C.
author_facet Basner, Mathias
Dinges, David F.
Howard, Kia
Moore, Tyler M.
Gur, Ruben C.
Mühl, Christian
Stahn, Alexander C.
author_sort Basner, Mathias
collection PubMed
description Environmental and psychological stressors can adversely affect astronaut cognitive performance in space. This study used a 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR) paradigm to simulate some of the physiologic changes induced by microgravity. Twenty-four participants (mean ± SD age 33.3 ± 9.2 years, N = 16 men) spent 60 consecutive days in strict HDBR. They were studied in three groups of eight subjects each. One group served as Control, whereas the other two groups received either a continuous or intermittent artificial gravity (AG) countermeasure of 30 min centrifugation daily (1 g acceleration at the center of mass and 2 g at the feet). Participants performed all 10 tests of NASA’s Cognition battery and a brief alertness and mood survey repeatedly before, during, and after the HDBR period. Test scores were adjusted for practice and stimulus set difficulty effects. A modest but statistically significant slowing across a range of cognitive domains was found in all three groups during HDBR compared to baseline, most consistently for sensorimotor speed, whereas accuracy was unaffected. These changes were observed early during HDBR and did not further worsen or improve with increasing time in HDBR, except for emotion recognition performance. With increasing time spent in HDBR, participants required longer time to decide which facial emotion was expressed. They were also more likely to select categories with negative valence over categories with neutral or positive valence. Except for workload, which was rated lower in the Control group, continuous or intermittent AG did not modify the effect of HDBR on cognitive performance or subjective responses. Participants expressed several negative survey responses during HDBR relative to baseline, and some of the responses further deteriorated during recovery, which highlights the importance of adequate medical and psychological support during extended duration HDBR studies. In conclusion, 60 days of HDBR were associated with moderate cognitive slowing and changes in emotion recognition performance, but these effects were not mitigated by either continuous or intermittent exposure to AG for 30 min daily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8009974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80099742021-04-01 Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest Basner, Mathias Dinges, David F. Howard, Kia Moore, Tyler M. Gur, Ruben C. Mühl, Christian Stahn, Alexander C. Front Physiol Physiology Environmental and psychological stressors can adversely affect astronaut cognitive performance in space. This study used a 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR) paradigm to simulate some of the physiologic changes induced by microgravity. Twenty-four participants (mean ± SD age 33.3 ± 9.2 years, N = 16 men) spent 60 consecutive days in strict HDBR. They were studied in three groups of eight subjects each. One group served as Control, whereas the other two groups received either a continuous or intermittent artificial gravity (AG) countermeasure of 30 min centrifugation daily (1 g acceleration at the center of mass and 2 g at the feet). Participants performed all 10 tests of NASA’s Cognition battery and a brief alertness and mood survey repeatedly before, during, and after the HDBR period. Test scores were adjusted for practice and stimulus set difficulty effects. A modest but statistically significant slowing across a range of cognitive domains was found in all three groups during HDBR compared to baseline, most consistently for sensorimotor speed, whereas accuracy was unaffected. These changes were observed early during HDBR and did not further worsen or improve with increasing time in HDBR, except for emotion recognition performance. With increasing time spent in HDBR, participants required longer time to decide which facial emotion was expressed. They were also more likely to select categories with negative valence over categories with neutral or positive valence. Except for workload, which was rated lower in the Control group, continuous or intermittent AG did not modify the effect of HDBR on cognitive performance or subjective responses. Participants expressed several negative survey responses during HDBR relative to baseline, and some of the responses further deteriorated during recovery, which highlights the importance of adequate medical and psychological support during extended duration HDBR studies. In conclusion, 60 days of HDBR were associated with moderate cognitive slowing and changes in emotion recognition performance, but these effects were not mitigated by either continuous or intermittent exposure to AG for 30 min daily. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8009974/ /pubmed/33815148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.643854 Text en Copyright © 2021 Basner, Dinges, Howard, Moore, Gur, Mühl and Stahn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Basner, Mathias
Dinges, David F.
Howard, Kia
Moore, Tyler M.
Gur, Ruben C.
Mühl, Christian
Stahn, Alexander C.
Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title_full Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title_fullStr Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title_full_unstemmed Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title_short Continuous and Intermittent Artificial Gravity as a Countermeasure to the Cognitive Effects of 60 Days of Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest
title_sort continuous and intermittent artificial gravity as a countermeasure to the cognitive effects of 60 days of head-down tilt bed rest
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8009974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.643854
work_keys_str_mv AT basnermathias continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT dingesdavidf continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT howardkia continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT mooretylerm continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT gurrubenc continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT muhlchristian continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest
AT stahnalexanderc continuousandintermittentartificialgravityasacountermeasuretothecognitiveeffectsof60daysofheaddowntiltbedrest