Cargando…

Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial

• The implementation of double- or triple-blind review practices will ensure that authors with worthwhile and prominent research will have fair and equitable review regardless of their prominence in the field. • Improving the quality of our reviews and raising the standings of our publishing authors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanfan, Dino, McKenney, Mark, Elkbuli, Adel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102211
_version_ 1783673052497707008
author Fanfan, Dino
McKenney, Mark
Elkbuli, Adel
author_facet Fanfan, Dino
McKenney, Mark
Elkbuli, Adel
author_sort Fanfan, Dino
collection PubMed
description • The implementation of double- or triple-blind review practices will ensure that authors with worthwhile and prominent research will have fair and equitable review regardless of their prominence in the field. • Improving the quality of our reviews and raising the standings of our publishing authors. This makes way for healthy competition and a drive to produce high quality research. • It is our responsibility to limit or eliminate bias by promoting impartiality and increasing the level of transparency between the editorial teams and authors, allowing peer review to be more inclusive, instructional, and equitable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80103822021-04-02 Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial Fanfan, Dino McKenney, Mark Elkbuli, Adel Ann Med Surg (Lond) Editorial • The implementation of double- or triple-blind review practices will ensure that authors with worthwhile and prominent research will have fair and equitable review regardless of their prominence in the field. • Improving the quality of our reviews and raising the standings of our publishing authors. This makes way for healthy competition and a drive to produce high quality research. • It is our responsibility to limit or eliminate bias by promoting impartiality and increasing the level of transparency between the editorial teams and authors, allowing peer review to be more inclusive, instructional, and equitable. Elsevier 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8010382/ /pubmed/33815786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102211 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Fanfan, Dino
McKenney, Mark
Elkbuli, Adel
Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title_full Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title_fullStr Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title_short Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
title_sort comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: towards reaching unbiased decisions – editorial
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102211
work_keys_str_mv AT fanfandino comprehensiveexaminationofthepeerreviewprocessinacademicmedicinetowardsreachingunbiaseddecisionseditorial
AT mckenneymark comprehensiveexaminationofthepeerreviewprocessinacademicmedicinetowardsreachingunbiaseddecisionseditorial
AT elkbuliadel comprehensiveexaminationofthepeerreviewprocessinacademicmedicinetowardsreachingunbiaseddecisionseditorial