Cargando…
Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Family Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438535 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025 |
_version_ | 1783673064707325952 |
---|---|
author | Senbursa, Gamze Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu Baltaci, Gul |
author_facet | Senbursa, Gamze Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu Baltaci, Gul |
author_sort | Senbursa, Gamze |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitation approach: group 1, soft tissue mobilization techniques and stabilization exercises (n=24; 11 females [F], 13 males [M]); group 2, Kinesio Taping and stabilization exercises (n=24; 12F, 12M); group 3, stabilization exercises (n=22; 11F, 11M); and group 4, reflex therapy and stabilization exercises (n=20; 10F, 10M). Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/s and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured before and assessed at the beginning, after a 4-week treatment and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Individuals in all groups showed similar decrease in pain after the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, but there were no significant differences in pain levels between the groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: All therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and thus helpful in increasing strength and stabilization in patients with LBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8010438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Family Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80104382021-04-06 Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Senbursa, Gamze Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu Baltaci, Gul Korean J Fam Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitation approach: group 1, soft tissue mobilization techniques and stabilization exercises (n=24; 11 females [F], 13 males [M]); group 2, Kinesio Taping and stabilization exercises (n=24; 12F, 12M); group 3, stabilization exercises (n=22; 11F, 11M); and group 4, reflex therapy and stabilization exercises (n=20; 10F, 10M). Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/s and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured before and assessed at the beginning, after a 4-week treatment and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Individuals in all groups showed similar decrease in pain after the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, but there were no significant differences in pain levels between the groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: All therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and thus helpful in increasing strength and stabilization in patients with LBP. Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2021-03 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8010438/ /pubmed/32438535 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Senbursa, Gamze Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu Baltaci, Gul Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of physiotherapy approaches in low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438535 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senbursagamze comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pekyavasnihanozunlu comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baltacigul comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial |