Cargando…

Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senbursa, Gamze, Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu, Baltaci, Gul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438535
http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025
_version_ 1783673064707325952
author Senbursa, Gamze
Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu
Baltaci, Gul
author_facet Senbursa, Gamze
Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu
Baltaci, Gul
author_sort Senbursa, Gamze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitation approach: group 1, soft tissue mobilization techniques and stabilization exercises (n=24; 11 females [F], 13 males [M]); group 2, Kinesio Taping and stabilization exercises (n=24; 12F, 12M); group 3, stabilization exercises (n=22; 11F, 11M); and group 4, reflex therapy and stabilization exercises (n=20; 10F, 10M). Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/s and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured before and assessed at the beginning, after a 4-week treatment and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Individuals in all groups showed similar decrease in pain after the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, but there were no significant differences in pain levels between the groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: All therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and thus helpful in increasing strength and stabilization in patients with LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Academy of Family Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80104382021-04-06 Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Senbursa, Gamze Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu Baltaci, Gul Korean J Fam Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation approaches in individuals with low back pain (LBP) on pain, spinal mobility, disability, and muscular strength. METHODS: Ninety volunteers were included and divided into four groups depending on the rehabilitation approach: group 1, soft tissue mobilization techniques and stabilization exercises (n=24; 11 females [F], 13 males [M]); group 2, Kinesio Taping and stabilization exercises (n=24; 12F, 12M); group 3, stabilization exercises (n=22; 11F, 11M); and group 4, reflex therapy and stabilization exercises (n=20; 10F, 10M). Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, an isokinetic evaluation for strength at 60°/s and a side-plank position test for trunk stabilization were measured before and assessed at the beginning, after a 4-week treatment and during 4 weeks of follow-up. The functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Individuals in all groups showed similar decrease in pain after the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, but there were no significant differences in pain levels between the groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: All therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and thus helpful in increasing strength and stabilization in patients with LBP. Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2021-03 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8010438/ /pubmed/32438535 http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Senbursa, Gamze
Pekyavas, Nihan Ozunlu
Baltaci, Gul
Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Physiotherapy Approaches in Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of physiotherapy approaches in low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438535
http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.20.0025
work_keys_str_mv AT senbursagamze comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pekyavasnihanozunlu comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baltacigul comparisonofphysiotherapyapproachesinlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial