Cargando…

Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III

Efficient enzymatic saccharification of cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars can enable production of bioproducts like ethanol. Native crystalline cellulose, or cellulose I, is inefficiently processed via enzymatic hydrolysis but can be converted into the structurally distinct cellulose III al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chundawat, Shishir P.S., Nemmaru, Bhargava, Hackl, Markus, Brady, Sonia K., Hilton, Mark A., Johnson, Madeline M., Chang, Sungrok, Lang, Matthew J., Huh, Hyun, Lee, Sang-Hyuk, Yarbrough, John M., López, Cesar A., Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100431
_version_ 1783673113320357888
author Chundawat, Shishir P.S.
Nemmaru, Bhargava
Hackl, Markus
Brady, Sonia K.
Hilton, Mark A.
Johnson, Madeline M.
Chang, Sungrok
Lang, Matthew J.
Huh, Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyuk
Yarbrough, John M.
López, Cesar A.
Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram
author_facet Chundawat, Shishir P.S.
Nemmaru, Bhargava
Hackl, Markus
Brady, Sonia K.
Hilton, Mark A.
Johnson, Madeline M.
Chang, Sungrok
Lang, Matthew J.
Huh, Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyuk
Yarbrough, John M.
López, Cesar A.
Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram
author_sort Chundawat, Shishir P.S.
collection PubMed
description Efficient enzymatic saccharification of cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars can enable production of bioproducts like ethanol. Native crystalline cellulose, or cellulose I, is inefficiently processed via enzymatic hydrolysis but can be converted into the structurally distinct cellulose III allomorph that is processed via cellulase cocktails derived from Trichoderma reesei up to 20-fold faster. However, characterization of individual cellulases from T. reesei, like the processive exocellulase Cel7A, shows reduced binding and activity at low enzyme loadings toward cellulose III. To clarify this discrepancy, we monitored the single-molecule initial binding commitment and subsequent processive motility of Cel7A enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) on cellulose using optical tweezers force spectroscopy. We confirmed a 48% lower initial binding commitment and 32% slower processive motility of Cel7A on cellulose III, which we hypothesized derives from reduced binding affinity of the Cel7A binding domain CBM1. Classical CBM–cellulose pull-down assays, depending on the adsorption model fitted, predicted between 1.2- and 7-fold reduction in CBM1 binding affinity for cellulose III. Force spectroscopy measurements of CBM1–cellulose interactions, along with molecular dynamics simulations, indicated that previous interpretations of classical binding assay results using multisite adsorption models may have complicated analysis, and instead suggest simpler single-site models should be used. These findings were corroborated by binding analysis of other type-A CBMs (CBM2a, CBM3a, CBM5, CBM10, and CBM64) on both cellulose allomorphs. Finally, we discuss how complementary analytical tools are critical to gain insight into the complex mechanisms of insoluble polysaccharides hydrolysis by cellulolytic enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80107092021-04-02 Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III Chundawat, Shishir P.S. Nemmaru, Bhargava Hackl, Markus Brady, Sonia K. Hilton, Mark A. Johnson, Madeline M. Chang, Sungrok Lang, Matthew J. Huh, Hyun Lee, Sang-Hyuk Yarbrough, John M. López, Cesar A. Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram J Biol Chem Research Article Efficient enzymatic saccharification of cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars can enable production of bioproducts like ethanol. Native crystalline cellulose, or cellulose I, is inefficiently processed via enzymatic hydrolysis but can be converted into the structurally distinct cellulose III allomorph that is processed via cellulase cocktails derived from Trichoderma reesei up to 20-fold faster. However, characterization of individual cellulases from T. reesei, like the processive exocellulase Cel7A, shows reduced binding and activity at low enzyme loadings toward cellulose III. To clarify this discrepancy, we monitored the single-molecule initial binding commitment and subsequent processive motility of Cel7A enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) on cellulose using optical tweezers force spectroscopy. We confirmed a 48% lower initial binding commitment and 32% slower processive motility of Cel7A on cellulose III, which we hypothesized derives from reduced binding affinity of the Cel7A binding domain CBM1. Classical CBM–cellulose pull-down assays, depending on the adsorption model fitted, predicted between 1.2- and 7-fold reduction in CBM1 binding affinity for cellulose III. Force spectroscopy measurements of CBM1–cellulose interactions, along with molecular dynamics simulations, indicated that previous interpretations of classical binding assay results using multisite adsorption models may have complicated analysis, and instead suggest simpler single-site models should be used. These findings were corroborated by binding analysis of other type-A CBMs (CBM2a, CBM3a, CBM5, CBM10, and CBM64) on both cellulose allomorphs. Finally, we discuss how complementary analytical tools are critical to gain insight into the complex mechanisms of insoluble polysaccharides hydrolysis by cellulolytic enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8010709/ /pubmed/33610545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100431 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Chundawat, Shishir P.S.
Nemmaru, Bhargava
Hackl, Markus
Brady, Sonia K.
Hilton, Mark A.
Johnson, Madeline M.
Chang, Sungrok
Lang, Matthew J.
Huh, Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyuk
Yarbrough, John M.
López, Cesar A.
Gnanakaran, Sandrasegaram
Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title_full Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title_fullStr Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title_full_unstemmed Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title_short Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III
title_sort molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose iii
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100431
work_keys_str_mv AT chundawatshishirps molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT nemmarubhargava molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT hacklmarkus molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT bradysoniak molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT hiltonmarka molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT johnsonmadelinem molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT changsungrok molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT langmatthewj molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT huhhyun molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT leesanghyuk molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT yarbroughjohnm molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT lopezcesara molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii
AT gnanakaransandrasegaram molecularoriginsofreducedactivityandbindingcommitmentofprocessivecellulasesandassociatedcarbohydratebindingproteinstocelluloseiii