Cargando…

Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been examined, the role of cognitive function following the widely publicised development of an inoculation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batty, G. David, Deary, Ian J., Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe, Gale, Catharine R., Altschul, Drew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253634
_version_ 1783673120868007936
author Batty, G. David
Deary, Ian J.
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
Gale, Catharine R.
Altschul, Drew
author_facet Batty, G. David
Deary, Ian J.
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
Gale, Catharine R.
Altschul, Drew
author_sort Batty, G. David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been examined, the role of cognitive function following the widely publicised development of an inoculation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study (COVID Survey), a prospective cohort study nested within Understanding Society (Main Survey). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16–95. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported intention to take up a vaccination for COVID-19. To summarise our results, we computed odds ratios with accompanying 95% confidence intervals for general cognitive function adjusted for selected covariates. RESULTS: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N=1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Our outcome was based on intention rather than behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability test scores being vaccine-hesitant. With people with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80107582021-04-01 Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study Batty, G. David Deary, Ian J. Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe Gale, Catharine R. Altschul, Drew medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been examined, the role of cognitive function following the widely publicised development of an inoculation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study (COVID Survey), a prospective cohort study nested within Understanding Society (Main Survey). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16–95. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported intention to take up a vaccination for COVID-19. To summarise our results, we computed odds ratios with accompanying 95% confidence intervals for general cognitive function adjusted for selected covariates. RESULTS: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N=1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Our outcome was based on intention rather than behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability test scores being vaccine-hesitant. With people with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8010758/ /pubmed/33791726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253634 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Batty, G. David
Deary, Ian J.
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
Gale, Catharine R.
Altschul, Drew
Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title_full Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title_fullStr Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title_short Pre-pandemic Cognitive Function and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cohort Study
title_sort pre-pandemic cognitive function and covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253634
work_keys_str_mv AT battygdavid prepandemiccognitivefunctionandcovid19vaccinehesitancycohortstudy
AT dearyianj prepandemiccognitivefunctionandcovid19vaccinehesitancycohortstudy
AT fawnsritchiechloe prepandemiccognitivefunctionandcovid19vaccinehesitancycohortstudy
AT galecathariner prepandemiccognitivefunctionandcovid19vaccinehesitancycohortstudy
AT altschuldrew prepandemiccognitivefunctionandcovid19vaccinehesitancycohortstudy