Cargando…

Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors

Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y(12) inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wadowski, Patricia P., Pultar, Joseph, Weikert, Constantin, Eichelberger, Beate, Lang, Irene M., Koppensteiner, Renate, Panzer, Simon, Gremmel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33107322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1074248420968706
_version_ 1783673149170122752
author Wadowski, Patricia P.
Pultar, Joseph
Weikert, Constantin
Eichelberger, Beate
Lang, Irene M.
Koppensteiner, Renate
Panzer, Simon
Gremmel, Thomas
author_facet Wadowski, Patricia P.
Pultar, Joseph
Weikert, Constantin
Eichelberger, Beate
Lang, Irene M.
Koppensteiner, Renate
Panzer, Simon
Gremmel, Thomas
author_sort Wadowski, Patricia P.
collection PubMed
description Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y(12) inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y(12) inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80108882021-04-08 Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors Wadowski, Patricia P. Pultar, Joseph Weikert, Constantin Eichelberger, Beate Lang, Irene M. Koppensteiner, Renate Panzer, Simon Gremmel, Thomas J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther Clinical Studies Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y(12) inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y(12) inhibition. SAGE Publications 2020-10-27 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8010888/ /pubmed/33107322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1074248420968706 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Wadowski, Patricia P.
Pultar, Joseph
Weikert, Constantin
Eichelberger, Beate
Lang, Irene M.
Koppensteiner, Renate
Panzer, Simon
Gremmel, Thomas
Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title_full Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title_fullStr Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title_short Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
title_sort comparison of light transmission aggregometry with impedance aggregometry in patients on potent p2y12 inhibitors
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33107322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1074248420968706
work_keys_str_mv AT wadowskipatriciap comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT pultarjoseph comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT weikertconstantin comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT eichelbergerbeate comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT langirenem comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT koppensteinerrenate comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT panzersimon comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors
AT gremmelthomas comparisonoflighttransmissionaggregometrywithimpedanceaggregometryinpatientsonpotentp2y12inhibitors