Cargando…

Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions

BACKGROUND: There are high estimates of the potential climate change mitigation opportunity of using wood products. A significant part of those estimates depends on long-lived wood products in the construction sector replacing concrete, steel, and other non-renewable goods. Often the climate change...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Christina, Dymond, Caren C., Griess, Verena C., Tolkien-Spurr, Darius, van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00171-w
_version_ 1783673157033394176
author Howard, Christina
Dymond, Caren C.
Griess, Verena C.
Tolkien-Spurr, Darius
van Kooten, G. Cornelis
author_facet Howard, Christina
Dymond, Caren C.
Griess, Verena C.
Tolkien-Spurr, Darius
van Kooten, G. Cornelis
author_sort Howard, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are high estimates of the potential climate change mitigation opportunity of using wood products. A significant part of those estimates depends on long-lived wood products in the construction sector replacing concrete, steel, and other non-renewable goods. Often the climate change mitigation benefits of this substitution are presented and quantified in the form of displacement factors. A displacement factor is numerically quantified as the reduction in emissions achieved per unit of wood used, representing the efficiency of biomass in decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. The substitution benefit for a given wood use scenario is then represented as the estimated change in emissions from baseline in a study’s modelling framework. The purpose of this review is to identify and assess the central economic and technical assumptions underlying forest carbon accounting and life cycle assessments that use displacement factors or similar simple methods. MAIN TEXT: Four assumptions in the way displacement factors are employed are analyzed: (1) changes in harvest or production rates will lead to a corresponding change in consumption of wood products, (2) wood building products are substitutable for concrete and steel, (3) the same mix of products could be produced from increased harvest rates, and (4) there are no market responses to increased wood use. CONCLUSIONS: After outlining these assumptions, we conclude suggesting that many studies assessing forest management or products for climate change mitigation depend on a suite of assumptions that the literature either does not support or only partially supports. Therefore, we encourage the research community to develop a more sophisticated model of the building sectors and their products. In the meantime, recognizing these assumptions has allowed us to identify some structural, production, and policy-based changes to the construction industry that could help realize the climate change mitigation potential of wood products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8010954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80109542021-03-31 Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions Howard, Christina Dymond, Caren C. Griess, Verena C. Tolkien-Spurr, Darius van Kooten, G. Cornelis Carbon Balance Manag Review BACKGROUND: There are high estimates of the potential climate change mitigation opportunity of using wood products. A significant part of those estimates depends on long-lived wood products in the construction sector replacing concrete, steel, and other non-renewable goods. Often the climate change mitigation benefits of this substitution are presented and quantified in the form of displacement factors. A displacement factor is numerically quantified as the reduction in emissions achieved per unit of wood used, representing the efficiency of biomass in decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. The substitution benefit for a given wood use scenario is then represented as the estimated change in emissions from baseline in a study’s modelling framework. The purpose of this review is to identify and assess the central economic and technical assumptions underlying forest carbon accounting and life cycle assessments that use displacement factors or similar simple methods. MAIN TEXT: Four assumptions in the way displacement factors are employed are analyzed: (1) changes in harvest or production rates will lead to a corresponding change in consumption of wood products, (2) wood building products are substitutable for concrete and steel, (3) the same mix of products could be produced from increased harvest rates, and (4) there are no market responses to increased wood use. CONCLUSIONS: After outlining these assumptions, we conclude suggesting that many studies assessing forest management or products for climate change mitigation depend on a suite of assumptions that the literature either does not support or only partially supports. Therefore, we encourage the research community to develop a more sophisticated model of the building sectors and their products. In the meantime, recognizing these assumptions has allowed us to identify some structural, production, and policy-based changes to the construction industry that could help realize the climate change mitigation potential of wood products. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8010954/ /pubmed/33786694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00171-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Howard, Christina
Dymond, Caren C.
Griess, Verena C.
Tolkien-Spurr, Darius
van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title_full Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title_fullStr Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title_full_unstemmed Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title_short Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
title_sort wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8010954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00171-w
work_keys_str_mv AT howardchristina woodproductcarbonsubstitutionbenefitsacriticalreviewofassumptions
AT dymondcarenc woodproductcarbonsubstitutionbenefitsacriticalreviewofassumptions
AT griessverenac woodproductcarbonsubstitutionbenefitsacriticalreviewofassumptions
AT tolkienspurrdarius woodproductcarbonsubstitutionbenefitsacriticalreviewofassumptions
AT vankootengcornelis woodproductcarbonsubstitutionbenefitsacriticalreviewofassumptions