Cargando…

Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Studies have questioned the necessity of restoring cavitated carious lesion on primary teeth, once the control of biofilm is the most important factor to arrest these lesions. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the survival of teeth treated with a non-restorative cavity cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianchi, Renata M. D., Pascareli-Carlos, Aline M., Floriano, Isabela, Raggio, Daniela P., Braga, Mariana M., Gimenez, Thais, Holanda, Mariana C., da Silva, Gabriela S., de Natal, Karina H., Tedesco, Tamara K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01524-0
_version_ 1783673174190194688
author Bianchi, Renata M. D.
Pascareli-Carlos, Aline M.
Floriano, Isabela
Raggio, Daniela P.
Braga, Mariana M.
Gimenez, Thais
Holanda, Mariana C.
da Silva, Gabriela S.
de Natal, Karina H.
Tedesco, Tamara K.
author_facet Bianchi, Renata M. D.
Pascareli-Carlos, Aline M.
Floriano, Isabela
Raggio, Daniela P.
Braga, Mariana M.
Gimenez, Thais
Holanda, Mariana C.
da Silva, Gabriela S.
de Natal, Karina H.
Tedesco, Tamara K.
author_sort Bianchi, Renata M. D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have questioned the necessity of restoring cavitated carious lesion on primary teeth, once the control of biofilm is the most important factor to arrest these lesions. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the survival of teeth treated with a non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) compared to resin composite restorations (RCR) on proximal carious lesion in anterior primary teeth, as well as the impact of these treatments on patient-centered outcomes. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with two parallels arms (1:1) will be conducted. Children between 3 and 6 years old will be selected from the Center of Clinic Research of Pediatric Dentistry of Ibirapuera University (UNIB), a dental trailer (FOUSP) located on Educational Complex Professor Carlos Osmarinho de Lima, the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Santa Cecília University and from the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of University Center UNINOVAFAPI. One hundred and forty-eight teeth will be randomly distributed in two experimental groups: (1) Selective removal of carious tissue and RCR; or (2) NRCC through cavity enlargement using a metallic sandpaper. The primary outcome will be tooth survival after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The duration and the cost of dental treatments will be considered for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of the evaluated treatments. The discomfort reported by the participants will be measured after each treatment using the FIS scale. The participants’ satisfaction and perception of the parents/legal guardians will be evaluated through questionnaires. For the primary outcome, Kaplan–Meier’s survival and Long-Rank test will be used for comparison between the two groups. All the variables will be modeled by Cox regression with shared fragility. Significance will be considered at 5%. DISCUSSION: The NRCC could be an option to manage carious lesions on proximal surfaces of primary teeth, and the approach could be well accepted by the children and parents/legal guardians. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03785730, Registered on December 18th 2018, first participant recruited 30/04/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03785730. Ethics Reference No: 91569118.8.0000.5597. Trial Sponsor: Universidade Ibirapuera. The Trial was prospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80110712021-03-31 Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial Bianchi, Renata M. D. Pascareli-Carlos, Aline M. Floriano, Isabela Raggio, Daniela P. Braga, Mariana M. Gimenez, Thais Holanda, Mariana C. da Silva, Gabriela S. de Natal, Karina H. Tedesco, Tamara K. BMC Oral Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Studies have questioned the necessity of restoring cavitated carious lesion on primary teeth, once the control of biofilm is the most important factor to arrest these lesions. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the survival of teeth treated with a non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) compared to resin composite restorations (RCR) on proximal carious lesion in anterior primary teeth, as well as the impact of these treatments on patient-centered outcomes. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial with two parallels arms (1:1) will be conducted. Children between 3 and 6 years old will be selected from the Center of Clinic Research of Pediatric Dentistry of Ibirapuera University (UNIB), a dental trailer (FOUSP) located on Educational Complex Professor Carlos Osmarinho de Lima, the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Santa Cecília University and from the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of University Center UNINOVAFAPI. One hundred and forty-eight teeth will be randomly distributed in two experimental groups: (1) Selective removal of carious tissue and RCR; or (2) NRCC through cavity enlargement using a metallic sandpaper. The primary outcome will be tooth survival after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The duration and the cost of dental treatments will be considered for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of the evaluated treatments. The discomfort reported by the participants will be measured after each treatment using the FIS scale. The participants’ satisfaction and perception of the parents/legal guardians will be evaluated through questionnaires. For the primary outcome, Kaplan–Meier’s survival and Long-Rank test will be used for comparison between the two groups. All the variables will be modeled by Cox regression with shared fragility. Significance will be considered at 5%. DISCUSSION: The NRCC could be an option to manage carious lesions on proximal surfaces of primary teeth, and the approach could be well accepted by the children and parents/legal guardians. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03785730, Registered on December 18th 2018, first participant recruited 30/04/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03785730. Ethics Reference No: 91569118.8.0000.5597. Trial Sponsor: Universidade Ibirapuera. The Trial was prospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011071/ /pubmed/33789643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01524-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bianchi, Renata M. D.
Pascareli-Carlos, Aline M.
Floriano, Isabela
Raggio, Daniela P.
Braga, Mariana M.
Gimenez, Thais
Holanda, Mariana C.
da Silva, Gabriela S.
de Natal, Karina H.
Tedesco, Tamara K.
Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title_full Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title_short Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
title_sort impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (cepeco 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01524-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bianchirenatamd impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pascarelicarlosalinem impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT florianoisabela impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raggiodanielap impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bragamarianam impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gimenezthais impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT holandamarianac impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dasilvagabrielas impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT denatalkarinah impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tedescotamarak impactofnonrestorativecavitycontrolonproximalcariouslesionsofanteriorprimaryteethonthetoothsurvivalandpatientcenteredoutcomescepeco2studyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomizedclinicaltrial