Cargando…

Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects the responsiveness to ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to assess the role of Dienogest pretreatment for endometriosis suppression as compared to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in patients with endometriosis pursuing IVF treatment. METHODS: In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalifa, Eissa, Mohammad, Hashem, Abdullah, Ameer, Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen, Khairy, Mohammed, Hosni, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03736-2
_version_ 1783673176523276288
author Khalifa, Eissa
Mohammad, Hashem
Abdullah, Ameer
Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen
Khairy, Mohammed
Hosni, Mahmoud
author_facet Khalifa, Eissa
Mohammad, Hashem
Abdullah, Ameer
Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen
Khairy, Mohammed
Hosni, Mahmoud
author_sort Khalifa, Eissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects the responsiveness to ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to assess the role of Dienogest pretreatment for endometriosis suppression as compared to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in patients with endometriosis pursuing IVF treatment. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 134 women with endometriosis-related infertility were randomly allocated to group A (n = 67) who had monthly depot GnRHa for 3 months before ovarian stimulation in IVF treatment (Ultra-long protocol), and Group B (n = 67) who had daily oral Dienogest 2 mg/d for 3 months before starting standard long protocol for IVF. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcome measures included the number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of life assessed by FertiQoL scores, cost of treatment, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Although there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding ovarian stimulation, response parameters, and pregnancy outcomes, the Dienogest group had a lower cost of treatment (2773 vs. 3664 EGP, P < 0.001), lower side effects (29.9% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001), higher FertiQoL treatment scores (33.2 vs. 25.1, P < 0.001) and higher tolerability scores (14.1 vs. 9.4, P < 0.001 < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that Dienogest is a suitable and safe substitute for GnRHa pretreatment in endometriosis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04500743 “Retrospectively registered on August 5, 2020”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80110822021-03-31 Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Khalifa, Eissa Mohammad, Hashem Abdullah, Ameer Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen Khairy, Mohammed Hosni, Mahmoud BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects the responsiveness to ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to assess the role of Dienogest pretreatment for endometriosis suppression as compared to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in patients with endometriosis pursuing IVF treatment. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 134 women with endometriosis-related infertility were randomly allocated to group A (n = 67) who had monthly depot GnRHa for 3 months before ovarian stimulation in IVF treatment (Ultra-long protocol), and Group B (n = 67) who had daily oral Dienogest 2 mg/d for 3 months before starting standard long protocol for IVF. The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcome measures included the number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, quality of life assessed by FertiQoL scores, cost of treatment, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Although there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding ovarian stimulation, response parameters, and pregnancy outcomes, the Dienogest group had a lower cost of treatment (2773 vs. 3664 EGP, P < 0.001), lower side effects (29.9% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001), higher FertiQoL treatment scores (33.2 vs. 25.1, P < 0.001) and higher tolerability scores (14.1 vs. 9.4, P < 0.001 < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that Dienogest is a suitable and safe substitute for GnRHa pretreatment in endometriosis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04500743 “Retrospectively registered on August 5, 2020”. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8011082/ /pubmed/33784989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03736-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khalifa, Eissa
Mohammad, Hashem
Abdullah, Ameer
Abdel-Rasheed, Mazen
Khairy, Mohammed
Hosni, Mahmoud
Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_short Role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before IVF-ET: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_sort role of suppression of endometriosis with progestins before ivf-et: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03736-2
work_keys_str_mv AT khalifaeissa roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadhashem roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abdullahameer roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abdelrasheedmazen roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khairymohammed roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hosnimahmoud roleofsuppressionofendometriosiswithprogestinsbeforeivfetanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial