Cargando…

Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study

BACKGROUND: The burden of frailty on older people is identifiable by its adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and long term functional and health outcomes. In patients suffering from a traumatic injury there is increasing evidence that it is frailty rather than age that impacts greatest on these o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarman, Heather, Crouch, Robert, Baxter, Mark, Wang, Chao, Peck, George, Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya, Jennings, Cara, Cole, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The burden of frailty on older people is identifiable by its adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and long term functional and health outcomes. In patients suffering from a traumatic injury there is increasing evidence that it is frailty rather than age that impacts greatest on these outcomes and that early identification can guide frailty specific care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of nurse-led assessment of frailty in older trauma patients in the ED in patients admitted to major trauma centres. METHODS: Patients age 65 years and over attending the Emergency Departments (ED) of five Major Trauma Centres following traumatic injury were enrolled between June 2019 and March 2020. Patients were assessed for frailty whilst in the ED using three different screening tools (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 [PRIMSA7], and the Trauma Specific Frailty Index [TSFI]) to compare feasibility and accuracy. Accuracy was determined by agreement with geriatrician assessment of frailty. The primary outcome was identification of frailty in the ED using three different assessment tools. RESULTS: We included 372 patients whose median age was 80, 53.8% of whom were female. The most common mechanism of injury was fall from less than 2 m followed by falls greater than 2 m. Completion rates for the tools were variable, 31.9% for TSFI, compared to 93% with PRISMA7 and 98.9% with the CFS. There was substantial agreement when using CFS between nurse defined frailty and geriatrician defined frailty. Agreement was moderate using PRISMA7 and slight using TSFI. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study has demonstrated that screening for frailty in older major trauma patients within the Emergency Department is feasible and accurate using CFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10671514. Registered 22 October 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4.