Cargando…

Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study

BACKGROUND: The burden of frailty on older people is identifiable by its adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and long term functional and health outcomes. In patients suffering from a traumatic injury there is increasing evidence that it is frailty rather than age that impacts greatest on these o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarman, Heather, Crouch, Robert, Baxter, Mark, Wang, Chao, Peck, George, Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya, Jennings, Cara, Cole, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4
_version_ 1783673185166688256
author Jarman, Heather
Crouch, Robert
Baxter, Mark
Wang, Chao
Peck, George
Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya
Jennings, Cara
Cole, Elaine
author_facet Jarman, Heather
Crouch, Robert
Baxter, Mark
Wang, Chao
Peck, George
Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya
Jennings, Cara
Cole, Elaine
author_sort Jarman, Heather
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The burden of frailty on older people is identifiable by its adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and long term functional and health outcomes. In patients suffering from a traumatic injury there is increasing evidence that it is frailty rather than age that impacts greatest on these outcomes and that early identification can guide frailty specific care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of nurse-led assessment of frailty in older trauma patients in the ED in patients admitted to major trauma centres. METHODS: Patients age 65 years and over attending the Emergency Departments (ED) of five Major Trauma Centres following traumatic injury were enrolled between June 2019 and March 2020. Patients were assessed for frailty whilst in the ED using three different screening tools (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 [PRIMSA7], and the Trauma Specific Frailty Index [TSFI]) to compare feasibility and accuracy. Accuracy was determined by agreement with geriatrician assessment of frailty. The primary outcome was identification of frailty in the ED using three different assessment tools. RESULTS: We included 372 patients whose median age was 80, 53.8% of whom were female. The most common mechanism of injury was fall from less than 2 m followed by falls greater than 2 m. Completion rates for the tools were variable, 31.9% for TSFI, compared to 93% with PRISMA7 and 98.9% with the CFS. There was substantial agreement when using CFS between nurse defined frailty and geriatrician defined frailty. Agreement was moderate using PRISMA7 and slight using TSFI. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study has demonstrated that screening for frailty in older major trauma patients within the Emergency Department is feasible and accurate using CFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10671514. Registered 22 October 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80111262021-03-31 Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study Jarman, Heather Crouch, Robert Baxter, Mark Wang, Chao Peck, George Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya Jennings, Cara Cole, Elaine Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The burden of frailty on older people is identifiable by its adverse effect on mortality, morbidity and long term functional and health outcomes. In patients suffering from a traumatic injury there is increasing evidence that it is frailty rather than age that impacts greatest on these outcomes and that early identification can guide frailty specific care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of nurse-led assessment of frailty in older trauma patients in the ED in patients admitted to major trauma centres. METHODS: Patients age 65 years and over attending the Emergency Departments (ED) of five Major Trauma Centres following traumatic injury were enrolled between June 2019 and March 2020. Patients were assessed for frailty whilst in the ED using three different screening tools (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 [PRIMSA7], and the Trauma Specific Frailty Index [TSFI]) to compare feasibility and accuracy. Accuracy was determined by agreement with geriatrician assessment of frailty. The primary outcome was identification of frailty in the ED using three different assessment tools. RESULTS: We included 372 patients whose median age was 80, 53.8% of whom were female. The most common mechanism of injury was fall from less than 2 m followed by falls greater than 2 m. Completion rates for the tools were variable, 31.9% for TSFI, compared to 93% with PRISMA7 and 98.9% with the CFS. There was substantial agreement when using CFS between nurse defined frailty and geriatrician defined frailty. Agreement was moderate using PRISMA7 and slight using TSFI. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study has demonstrated that screening for frailty in older major trauma patients within the Emergency Department is feasible and accurate using CFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10671514. Registered 22 October 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8011126/ /pubmed/33785031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jarman, Heather
Crouch, Robert
Baxter, Mark
Wang, Chao
Peck, George
Sivapathasuntharam, Dhanupriya
Jennings, Cara
Cole, Elaine
Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title_full Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title_fullStr Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title_short Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
title_sort feasibility and accuracy of ed frailty identification in older trauma patients: a prospective multi-centre study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00868-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jarmanheather feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT crouchrobert feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT baxtermark feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT wangchao feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT peckgeorge feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT sivapathasuntharamdhanupriya feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT jenningscara feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT coleelaine feasibilityandaccuracyofedfrailtyidentificationinoldertraumapatientsaprospectivemulticentrestudy