Cargando…

Projection-dependent heterogeneity of cerebellar granule cell calcium responses

Cerebellar granule cells (GCs) relay mossy fiber (MF) inputs to Purkinje cell dendrites via their axons, the parallel fibers (PFs), which are individually located at a given sublayer of the molecular layer (ML). Although a certain degree of heterogeneity among GCs has been recently reported, variabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Jun Kyu, Park, Heeyoun, Kim, Taegon, Yamamoto, Yukio, Tanaka-Yamamoto, Keiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00773-y
Descripción
Sumario:Cerebellar granule cells (GCs) relay mossy fiber (MF) inputs to Purkinje cell dendrites via their axons, the parallel fibers (PFs), which are individually located at a given sublayer of the molecular layer (ML). Although a certain degree of heterogeneity among GCs has been recently reported, variability of GC responses to MF inputs has never been associated with their most notable structural variability, location of their projecting PFs in the ML. Here, we utilize an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated labeling technique that enables us to categorize GCs according to the location of their PFs, and compare the Ca(2+) responses to MF stimulations between three groups of GCs, consisting of either GCs having PFs at the deep (D-GCs), middle (M-GCs), or superficial (S-GCs) sublayer. Our structural analysis revealed that there was no correlation between position of GC soma in the GC layer and location of its PF in the ML, confirming that our AAV-mediated labeling was important to test the projection-dependent variability of the Ca(2+) responses in GCs. We then found that the Ca(2+) responses of D-GCs differed from those of M-GCs. Pharmacological experiments implied that the different Ca(2+) responses were mainly attributable to varied distributions of GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) at the synaptic and extrasynaptic regions of GC dendrites. In addition to GABA(A)R distributions, amounts of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors appear to be also varied, because Ca(2+) responses were different between D-GCs and M-GCs when glutamate spillover was enhanced. Whereas the Ca(2+) responses of S-GCs were mostly equivalent to those of D-GCs and M-GCs, the blockade of GABA uptake resulted in larger Ca(2+) responses in S-GCs compared with D-GCs and M-GCs, implying existence of mechanisms leading to more excitability in S-GCs with increased GABA release. Thus, this study reveals MF stimulation-mediated non-uniform Ca(2+) responses in the cerebellar GCs associated with the location of their PFs in the ML, and raises a possibility that combination of inherent functional variability of GCs and their specific axonal projection contributes to the information processing through the GCs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13041-021-00773-y.