Cargando…

Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?

The integration of human rights principles in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research is often recognised to be of value. Good examples abound but lack of clarity persists as to what defines rights-inclusive SRH research. To help move the field forward, this article seeks to explore how key st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruskin, Sofia, Jardell, William, Ferguson, Laura, Zacharias, Kristin, Khosla, Rajat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1881206
_version_ 1783673256209809408
author Gruskin, Sofia
Jardell, William
Ferguson, Laura
Zacharias, Kristin
Khosla, Rajat
author_facet Gruskin, Sofia
Jardell, William
Ferguson, Laura
Zacharias, Kristin
Khosla, Rajat
author_sort Gruskin, Sofia
collection PubMed
description The integration of human rights principles in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research is often recognised to be of value. Good examples abound but lack of clarity persists as to what defines rights-inclusive SRH research. To help move the field forward, this article seeks to explore how key stakeholders responsible for funding and supporting rights in SRH research understand the strengths and weaknesses of what is being done and where, and begins to catalogue potential tools and actions for the future. Interviews with a range of key stakeholders including international civil servants, donors and researchers committed to and supportive of integrating rights into SRH research were conducted and analysed. Interviews confirmed important differences in what is understood to be SRH rights-oriented research and what it can accomplish. General barriers include lack of understanding about the importance of rights; lack of clarity as to the best approach to integration; fear of adding more work with little added benefit; as well as the lack of methodological guidance or published research methodologies that integrate rights. Suggestions include the development of a comprehensive checklist for each phase of research from developing a research statement through ultimately to publication; development of training modules and workshops; inclusion of rights in curricula; changes in journal requirements; and agreement among key funding sources to mandate the integration of rights principles in research proposals they receive. As a next step, cataloguing issues and concerns at local levels can help move the integration of human rights in SRH research from rhetoric to reality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80116842021-04-08 Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there? Gruskin, Sofia Jardell, William Ferguson, Laura Zacharias, Kristin Khosla, Rajat Sex Reprod Health Matters Research Article The integration of human rights principles in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research is often recognised to be of value. Good examples abound but lack of clarity persists as to what defines rights-inclusive SRH research. To help move the field forward, this article seeks to explore how key stakeholders responsible for funding and supporting rights in SRH research understand the strengths and weaknesses of what is being done and where, and begins to catalogue potential tools and actions for the future. Interviews with a range of key stakeholders including international civil servants, donors and researchers committed to and supportive of integrating rights into SRH research were conducted and analysed. Interviews confirmed important differences in what is understood to be SRH rights-oriented research and what it can accomplish. General barriers include lack of understanding about the importance of rights; lack of clarity as to the best approach to integration; fear of adding more work with little added benefit; as well as the lack of methodological guidance or published research methodologies that integrate rights. Suggestions include the development of a comprehensive checklist for each phase of research from developing a research statement through ultimately to publication; development of training modules and workshops; inclusion of rights in curricula; changes in journal requirements; and agreement among key funding sources to mandate the integration of rights principles in research proposals they receive. As a next step, cataloguing issues and concerns at local levels can help move the integration of human rights in SRH research from rhetoric to reality. Taylor & Francis 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8011684/ /pubmed/33595424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1881206 Text en © 2021 World Health Organization. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. This article shall not be used or reproduced in association with the promotion of commercial products, services or any entity. There should be no suggestion that the World Health Organization (WHO) endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL. Disclaimer The authors are staff members of the World Health Organization and are themselves alone responsible for the views expressed in the Article, which do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the World Health Organization or Taylor & Francis Group.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gruskin, Sofia
Jardell, William
Ferguson, Laura
Zacharias, Kristin
Khosla, Rajat
Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title_full Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title_fullStr Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title_full_unstemmed Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title_short Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
title_sort integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1881206
work_keys_str_mv AT gruskinsofia integratinghumanrightsintosexualandreproductivehealthresearchmovingbeyondtherhetoricwhatwillittaketogetusthere
AT jardellwilliam integratinghumanrightsintosexualandreproductivehealthresearchmovingbeyondtherhetoricwhatwillittaketogetusthere
AT fergusonlaura integratinghumanrightsintosexualandreproductivehealthresearchmovingbeyondtherhetoricwhatwillittaketogetusthere
AT zachariaskristin integratinghumanrightsintosexualandreproductivehealthresearchmovingbeyondtherhetoricwhatwillittaketogetusthere
AT khoslarajat integratinghumanrightsintosexualandreproductivehealthresearchmovingbeyondtherhetoricwhatwillittaketogetusthere