Cargando…

Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review

BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hut-Mossel, Lisanne, Ahaus, Kees, Welker, Gera, Gans, Rijk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677
_version_ 1783673265858805760
author Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Ahaus, Kees
Welker, Gera
Gans, Rijk
author_facet Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Ahaus, Kees
Welker, Gera
Gans, Rijk
author_sort Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. METHODS: A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOcs). RESULTS: From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016039882.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80117422021-04-07 Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera Gans, Rijk PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. METHODS: A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOcs). RESULTS: From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016039882. Public Library of Science 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011742/ /pubmed/33788894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677 Text en © 2021 Hut-Mossel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Ahaus, Kees
Welker, Gera
Gans, Rijk
Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title_full Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title_fullStr Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title_full_unstemmed Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title_short Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
title_sort understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: a systematic realist review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677
work_keys_str_mv AT hutmossellisanne understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview
AT ahauskees understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview
AT welkergera understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview
AT gansrijk understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview