Cargando…
Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review
BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677 |
_version_ | 1783673265858805760 |
---|---|
author | Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera Gans, Rijk |
author_facet | Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera Gans, Rijk |
author_sort | Hut-Mossel, Lisanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. METHODS: A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOcs). RESULTS: From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016039882. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8011742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80117422021-04-07 Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera Gans, Rijk PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. METHODS: A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOcs). RESULTS: From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42016039882. Public Library of Science 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011742/ /pubmed/33788894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677 Text en © 2021 Hut-Mossel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Ahaus, Kees Welker, Gera Gans, Rijk Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title | Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title_full | Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title_fullStr | Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title_short | Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review |
title_sort | understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: a systematic realist review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hutmossellisanne understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview AT ahauskees understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview AT welkergera understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview AT gansrijk understandinghowandwhyauditsworkinimprovingthequalityofhospitalcareasystematicrealistreview |