Cargando…

Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media

Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habibi, Sarah A., Salim, Lidya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507
_version_ 1783673272122998784
author Habibi, Sarah A.
Salim, Lidya
author_facet Habibi, Sarah A.
Salim, Lidya
author_sort Habibi, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80117692021-04-07 Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media Habibi, Sarah A. Salim, Lidya PLoS One Research Article Science communication has been increasingly viewed as a necessity and obligation of scientists in recent years. The rise of Web 2.0 technologies, such as social media, has made communication of science to the public more accessible as a whole. While one of the primary goals of science communication is to increase public engagement, there is very little research to show the type of communication that fosters the highest levels of engagement. Here we evaluate two social medial platforms, Instagram and TikTok, and assess the type of educational science content (ESC) that promotes user awareness and overall engagement. Specifically, we measured the level of engagement between static and dynamic posts on Instagram, and lecture-style and experimental videos on TikTok. User engagement is measured through the analysis of relative number of likes, comments, shares, saves, and views of each post in the various categories. We found that users interact with ESC significantly more (p<0.05) when the content is presented in dynamic ways with a component of experimentation. Together, we took the findings of this study and provided a series of suggestions for conducting science communication on social media, and the type of ESC that should be used to promote better user outcomes. Public Library of Science 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011769/ /pubmed/33788841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507 Text en © 2021 Habibi, Salim http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Habibi, Sarah A.
Salim, Lidya
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title_full Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title_fullStr Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title_full_unstemmed Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title_short Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
title_sort static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: a critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507
work_keys_str_mv AT habibisaraha staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia
AT salimlidya staticvsdynamicmethodsofdeliveryforsciencecommunicationacriticalanalysisofuserengagementwithscienceonsocialmedia