Cargando…

A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data

The interpretation of archaeological features often requires a combined methodological approach in order to make the most of the material record, particularly from sites where this may be limited. In practice, this requires the consultation of different sources of information in order to cross valid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Daniella, Stafford, Richard, Jenkins, Emma L., Garrard, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248261
_version_ 1783673275851735040
author Vos, Daniella
Stafford, Richard
Jenkins, Emma L.
Garrard, Andrew
author_facet Vos, Daniella
Stafford, Richard
Jenkins, Emma L.
Garrard, Andrew
author_sort Vos, Daniella
collection PubMed
description The interpretation of archaeological features often requires a combined methodological approach in order to make the most of the material record, particularly from sites where this may be limited. In practice, this requires the consultation of different sources of information in order to cross validate findings and combat issues of ambiguity and equifinality. However, the application of a multiproxy approach often generates incompatible data, and might therefore still provide ambiguous results. This paper explores the potential of a simple digital framework to increase the explanatory power of multiproxy data by enabling the incorporation of incompatible, ambiguous datasets in a single model. In order to achieve this, Bayesian confirmation was used in combination with decision trees. The results of phytolith and geochemical analyses carried out on soil samples from ephemeral sites in Jordan are used here as a case study. The combination of the two datasets as part of a single model enabled us to refine the initial interpretation of the use of space at the archaeological sites by providing an alternative identification for certain activity areas. The potential applications of this model are much broader, as it can also help researchers in other domains reach an integrated interpretation of analysis results by combining different datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80117852021-04-07 A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data Vos, Daniella Stafford, Richard Jenkins, Emma L. Garrard, Andrew PLoS One Research Article The interpretation of archaeological features often requires a combined methodological approach in order to make the most of the material record, particularly from sites where this may be limited. In practice, this requires the consultation of different sources of information in order to cross validate findings and combat issues of ambiguity and equifinality. However, the application of a multiproxy approach often generates incompatible data, and might therefore still provide ambiguous results. This paper explores the potential of a simple digital framework to increase the explanatory power of multiproxy data by enabling the incorporation of incompatible, ambiguous datasets in a single model. In order to achieve this, Bayesian confirmation was used in combination with decision trees. The results of phytolith and geochemical analyses carried out on soil samples from ephemeral sites in Jordan are used here as a case study. The combination of the two datasets as part of a single model enabled us to refine the initial interpretation of the use of space at the archaeological sites by providing an alternative identification for certain activity areas. The potential applications of this model are much broader, as it can also help researchers in other domains reach an integrated interpretation of analysis results by combining different datasets. Public Library of Science 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011785/ /pubmed/33788845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248261 Text en © 2021 Vos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vos, Daniella
Stafford, Richard
Jenkins, Emma L.
Garrard, Andrew
A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title_full A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title_fullStr A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title_full_unstemmed A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title_short A model based on Bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
title_sort model based on bayesian confirmation and machine learning algorithms to aid archaeological interpretation by integrating incompatible data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248261
work_keys_str_mv AT vosdaniella amodelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT staffordrichard amodelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT jenkinsemmal amodelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT garrardandrew amodelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT vosdaniella modelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT staffordrichard modelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT jenkinsemmal modelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata
AT garrardandrew modelbasedonbayesianconfirmationandmachinelearningalgorithmstoaidarchaeologicalinterpretationbyintegratingincompatibledata