Cargando…

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Lu, Jin, Xiao, Liu, Zheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249040
_version_ 1783673278195302400
author Dai, Lu
Jin, Xiao
Liu, Zheng
author_facet Dai, Lu
Jin, Xiao
Liu, Zheng
author_sort Dai, Lu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A. METHODS: We first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I(2) statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random‐effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I(2)>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20–2.38 I(2) = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02–1.95 I(2) = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33–2.86, I(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15–2.92, I(2) = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: GPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8011795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80117952021-04-07 Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis Dai, Lu Jin, Xiao Liu, Zheng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: GPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A. METHODS: We first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I(2) statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random‐effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I(2)>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20–2.38 I(2) = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02–1.95 I(2) = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33–2.86, I(2) = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15–2.92, I(2) = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: GPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers. Public Library of Science 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8011795/ /pubmed/33788883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249040 Text en © 2021 Dai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dai, Lu
Jin, Xiao
Liu, Zheng
Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of GPRC5A in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic and clinicopathological significance of gprc5a in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8011795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33788883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249040
work_keys_str_mv AT dailu prognosticandclinicopathologicalsignificanceofgprc5ainvariouscancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinxiao prognosticandclinicopathologicalsignificanceofgprc5ainvariouscancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzheng prognosticandclinicopathologicalsignificanceofgprc5ainvariouscancersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis