Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative

Mass casualty incidents such as those that are being experienced during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic can overwhelm local healthcare systems, where the number of casualties exceeds local resources and capabilities in a short period of time. The influx of patients with lung functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urbina, Jesica, Monks, Stormy M, Ochoa, Luis, Stump, Robert F, Wicker, Ryan B, Danek, Chris, Torres, Victor I, Crawford, Scott B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13642
_version_ 1783673313576353792
author Urbina, Jesica
Monks, Stormy M
Ochoa, Luis
Stump, Robert F
Wicker, Ryan B
Danek, Chris
Torres, Victor I
Crawford, Scott B
author_facet Urbina, Jesica
Monks, Stormy M
Ochoa, Luis
Stump, Robert F
Wicker, Ryan B
Danek, Chris
Torres, Victor I
Crawford, Scott B
author_sort Urbina, Jesica
collection PubMed
description Mass casualty incidents such as those that are being experienced during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic can overwhelm local healthcare systems, where the number of casualties exceeds local resources and capabilities in a short period of time. The influx of patients with lung function deterioration as a result of COVID-19 has strained traditional ventilator supplies. To bridge the gap during ventilator shortages and to help clinicians triage patients, manual resuscitator devices can be used to deliver respirations to a patient requiring breathing support. Bag-valve mask (BVM) devices are ubiquitous in ambulances and healthcare environments, however require a medical professional to be present and constantly applying compression to provide the patient with respirations. We developed an automated manual resuscitator-based emergency ventilator-alternative (AMREV) that provides automated compressions of a BVM in a repetitive manner and is broadly compatible with commercially-available BVM devices approximately 5 inches (128 mm) in diameter. The AMREV device relieves the medical professional from providing manual breathing support and allows for hands-free operation of the BVM. The AMREV supports the following treatment parameters: 1) adjustable tidal volume (V(T)), 2) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (intrinsic and/or external), 3) 1:1 inspiratory: expiratory ratio, and 4) a controllable respiratory rate between 10-30 breaths per minute. The relationship between the inherent resistance and compliance of the lung and the delivered breaths was assessed for the AMREV device. Adjustable V(T) of 110-700 ml was achieved within the range of simulated lung states. A linear increase in mean airway pressure (P(aw)), from 10-40 cmH(2)O was observed, as the resistance and compliance on the lung model moved from normal to severe simulated disease states. The AMREV functioned continuously for seven days with less than 3.2% variation in delivered V(T) and P(aw). Additionally, the AMREV device was compatible with seven commercially-available BVM setups and delivered consistent V(T) and P(aw) within 10% between models. This automated BVM-based emergency-use resuscitator can provide consistent positive pressure, volume-controlled ventilation over an extended duration when a traditional ventilator is not available. True ventilator shortages may lead to manual resuscitators devices such as the AMREV being the only option for some healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8012105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80121052021-04-05 Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative Urbina, Jesica Monks, Stormy M Ochoa, Luis Stump, Robert F Wicker, Ryan B Danek, Chris Torres, Victor I Crawford, Scott B Cureus Emergency Medicine Mass casualty incidents such as those that are being experienced during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic can overwhelm local healthcare systems, where the number of casualties exceeds local resources and capabilities in a short period of time. The influx of patients with lung function deterioration as a result of COVID-19 has strained traditional ventilator supplies. To bridge the gap during ventilator shortages and to help clinicians triage patients, manual resuscitator devices can be used to deliver respirations to a patient requiring breathing support. Bag-valve mask (BVM) devices are ubiquitous in ambulances and healthcare environments, however require a medical professional to be present and constantly applying compression to provide the patient with respirations. We developed an automated manual resuscitator-based emergency ventilator-alternative (AMREV) that provides automated compressions of a BVM in a repetitive manner and is broadly compatible with commercially-available BVM devices approximately 5 inches (128 mm) in diameter. The AMREV device relieves the medical professional from providing manual breathing support and allows for hands-free operation of the BVM. The AMREV supports the following treatment parameters: 1) adjustable tidal volume (V(T)), 2) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (intrinsic and/or external), 3) 1:1 inspiratory: expiratory ratio, and 4) a controllable respiratory rate between 10-30 breaths per minute. The relationship between the inherent resistance and compliance of the lung and the delivered breaths was assessed for the AMREV device. Adjustable V(T) of 110-700 ml was achieved within the range of simulated lung states. A linear increase in mean airway pressure (P(aw)), from 10-40 cmH(2)O was observed, as the resistance and compliance on the lung model moved from normal to severe simulated disease states. The AMREV functioned continuously for seven days with less than 3.2% variation in delivered V(T) and P(aw). Additionally, the AMREV device was compatible with seven commercially-available BVM setups and delivered consistent V(T) and P(aw) within 10% between models. This automated BVM-based emergency-use resuscitator can provide consistent positive pressure, volume-controlled ventilation over an extended duration when a traditional ventilator is not available. True ventilator shortages may lead to manual resuscitators devices such as the AMREV being the only option for some healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8012105/ /pubmed/33824795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13642 Text en Copyright © 2021, Urbina et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Urbina, Jesica
Monks, Stormy M
Ochoa, Luis
Stump, Robert F
Wicker, Ryan B
Danek, Chris
Torres, Victor I
Crawford, Scott B
Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title_full Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title_short Development and Evaluation of an Automated Manual Resuscitator-Based Emergency Ventilator-Alternative
title_sort development and evaluation of an automated manual resuscitator-based emergency ventilator-alternative
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13642
work_keys_str_mv AT urbinajesica developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT monksstormym developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT ochoaluis developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT stumprobertf developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT wickerryanb developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT danekchris developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT torresvictori developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative
AT crawfordscottb developmentandevaluationofanautomatedmanualresuscitatorbasedemergencyventilatoralternative