Cargando…

Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms

BACKGROUND: A major concern related to modern surgery is to evaluate and address the complications associated with breast enlargement using Aquafilling(®) injection. This study aimed to assess the effect of Aquafilling(®) injection on immune response in such patients. METHODS: For four patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chalcarz, Michał, Żurawski, Jakub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01949-y
_version_ 1783673343387369472
author Chalcarz, Michał
Żurawski, Jakub
author_facet Chalcarz, Michał
Żurawski, Jakub
author_sort Chalcarz, Michał
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major concern related to modern surgery is to evaluate and address the complications associated with breast enlargement using Aquafilling(®) injection. This study aimed to assess the effect of Aquafilling(®) injection on immune response in such patients. METHODS: For four patients who consulted a surgeon after receiving Aquafilling(®) injection, medical history of the patients was taken; based on imaging examinations, Aquafilling(®) was removed. Samples were processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. For detecting tissue antigens in histopathological samples, monoclonal antibodies against CD3 (lymphocytes T), CD 20 (lymphocytes B), and CD68 (macrophages) were used. By analyzing the images, the number of immune cells (lymphocytes T, lymphocytes B, and macrophages) and immunohistochemical reaction area were semiquantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: Different clinical features were observed in each patient after receiving Aquafilling(®) injection. In samples obtained from four patients, lymphocytes T (CD3), lymphocytes B (CD20), and macrophages (CD68) tissue expressions were observed. Statistically significant variations in the number of lymphocytes B (CD20) and macrophages (CD68), and differentiation of immunohistochemical reaction area for lymphocytes T (CD3) and lymphocytes B (CD20) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation is elevated in patients who received Aquafilling(®) injection. Medical imaging should be carried out in all such patients even if there are no visible symptoms. Removal of Aquafilling(®) can reduce the inflammation and risk of neoplastic progression in the patients. The influence of time elapsed since Aquafilling(®) injection and intensity of immune response requires further validation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8012309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80123092021-04-16 Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms Chalcarz, Michał Żurawski, Jakub Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: A major concern related to modern surgery is to evaluate and address the complications associated with breast enlargement using Aquafilling(®) injection. This study aimed to assess the effect of Aquafilling(®) injection on immune response in such patients. METHODS: For four patients who consulted a surgeon after receiving Aquafilling(®) injection, medical history of the patients was taken; based on imaging examinations, Aquafilling(®) was removed. Samples were processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. For detecting tissue antigens in histopathological samples, monoclonal antibodies against CD3 (lymphocytes T), CD 20 (lymphocytes B), and CD68 (macrophages) were used. By analyzing the images, the number of immune cells (lymphocytes T, lymphocytes B, and macrophages) and immunohistochemical reaction area were semiquantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: Different clinical features were observed in each patient after receiving Aquafilling(®) injection. In samples obtained from four patients, lymphocytes T (CD3), lymphocytes B (CD20), and macrophages (CD68) tissue expressions were observed. Statistically significant variations in the number of lymphocytes B (CD20) and macrophages (CD68), and differentiation of immunohistochemical reaction area for lymphocytes T (CD3) and lymphocytes B (CD20) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation is elevated in patients who received Aquafilling(®) injection. Medical imaging should be carried out in all such patients even if there are no visible symptoms. Removal of Aquafilling(®) can reduce the inflammation and risk of neoplastic progression in the patients. The influence of time elapsed since Aquafilling(®) injection and intensity of immune response requires further validation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2020-09-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8012309/ /pubmed/32939601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01949-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chalcarz, Michał
Żurawski, Jakub
Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title_full Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title_fullStr Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title_short Injection of Aquafilling(®) for Breast Augmentation Causes Inflammatory Responses Independent of Visible Symptoms
title_sort injection of aquafilling(®) for breast augmentation causes inflammatory responses independent of visible symptoms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32939601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01949-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chalcarzmichał injectionofaquafillingforbreastaugmentationcausesinflammatoryresponsesindependentofvisiblesymptoms
AT zurawskijakub injectionofaquafillingforbreastaugmentationcausesinflammatoryresponsesindependentofvisiblesymptoms