Cargando…
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment
BACKGROUND: The Elipse™ intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a new swallowable balloon for weight loss (WL). Preserving metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) during WL are crucial to maximize fat mass (FM) loss. After EIGB placement, a standard low-calorie diet (LCD) is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05133-8 |
_version_ | 1783673350652952576 |
---|---|
author | Schiavo, Luigi De Stefano, Giovanni Persico, Francesco Gargiulo, Stefano Di Spirito, Federica Griguolo, Giulia Petrucciani, Niccolò Fontas, Eric Iannelli, Antonio Pilone, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Schiavo, Luigi De Stefano, Giovanni Persico, Francesco Gargiulo, Stefano Di Spirito, Federica Griguolo, Giulia Petrucciani, Niccolò Fontas, Eric Iannelli, Antonio Pilone, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Schiavo, Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Elipse™ intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a new swallowable balloon for weight loss (WL). Preserving metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) during WL are crucial to maximize fat mass (FM) loss. After EIGB placement, a standard low-calorie diet (LCD) is generally prescribed. A low-calorie ketogenic diet (LCKD) has proven to be safe and effective in reducing FM while preserving FFM and RMR. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the effects on WL, FM, FFM, and RMR in two groups of patients who were randomized to two different diets: LCKD and a standard LCD after EIGB placement. METHODS: WL, FM, FFM, and RMR were measured before EIGB and at 4 months in 48 patients who received either a LCKD (n = 24) or a standard LCD (n = 24). Compliance in following the prescribed diet was determined with food frequency questionnaires in all patients. The impact of LCKD and LCD on renal function was also evaluated. RESULTS: The LCKD group showed a significantly lower decrease in FFM and RMR when compared with the LCD group (3.55 vs 14.3%, p < 0.001; 9.79 vs 11.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). FM decreased more significantly with LCKD compared to LCD (41.6 vs 33.1%, p = 0.0606). Compliance in following the prescribed diets, without negative impact on renal function, was found. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, despite the small sample size, we were able to support the hypothesis that LCKD is associated with an increased FM loss while reducing the FFM loss and the RMR, without interfering with renal function after EIGB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8012342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80123422021-04-16 A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment Schiavo, Luigi De Stefano, Giovanni Persico, Francesco Gargiulo, Stefano Di Spirito, Federica Griguolo, Giulia Petrucciani, Niccolò Fontas, Eric Iannelli, Antonio Pilone, Vincenzo Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: The Elipse™ intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a new swallowable balloon for weight loss (WL). Preserving metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) during WL are crucial to maximize fat mass (FM) loss. After EIGB placement, a standard low-calorie diet (LCD) is generally prescribed. A low-calorie ketogenic diet (LCKD) has proven to be safe and effective in reducing FM while preserving FFM and RMR. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the effects on WL, FM, FFM, and RMR in two groups of patients who were randomized to two different diets: LCKD and a standard LCD after EIGB placement. METHODS: WL, FM, FFM, and RMR were measured before EIGB and at 4 months in 48 patients who received either a LCKD (n = 24) or a standard LCD (n = 24). Compliance in following the prescribed diet was determined with food frequency questionnaires in all patients. The impact of LCKD and LCD on renal function was also evaluated. RESULTS: The LCKD group showed a significantly lower decrease in FFM and RMR when compared with the LCD group (3.55 vs 14.3%, p < 0.001; 9.79 vs 11.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). FM decreased more significantly with LCKD compared to LCD (41.6 vs 33.1%, p = 0.0606). Compliance in following the prescribed diets, without negative impact on renal function, was found. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, despite the small sample size, we were able to support the hypothesis that LCKD is associated with an increased FM loss while reducing the FFM loss and the RMR, without interfering with renal function after EIGB. Springer US 2020-11-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8012342/ /pubmed/33215362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05133-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Schiavo, Luigi De Stefano, Giovanni Persico, Francesco Gargiulo, Stefano Di Spirito, Federica Griguolo, Giulia Petrucciani, Niccolò Fontas, Eric Iannelli, Antonio Pilone, Vincenzo A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title | A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title_full | A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title_fullStr | A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title_short | A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment |
title_sort | randomized, controlled trial comparing the impact of a low-calorie ketogenic vs a standard low-calorie diet on fat-free mass in patients receiving an elipse™ intragastric balloon treatment |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05133-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiavoluigi arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT destefanogiovanni arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT persicofrancesco arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT gargiulostefano arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT dispiritofederica arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT griguologiulia arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT petruccianiniccolo arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT fontaseric arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT iannelliantonio arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT pilonevincenzo arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT schiavoluigi randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT destefanogiovanni randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT persicofrancesco randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT gargiulostefano randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT dispiritofederica randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT griguologiulia randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT petruccianiniccolo randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT fontaseric randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT iannelliantonio randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment AT pilonevincenzo randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheimpactofalowcalorieketogenicvsastandardlowcaloriedietonfatfreemassinpatientsreceivinganelipseintragastricballoontreatment |