Cargando…

Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats

Introduction  Reconstruction forms the primary tenet in plastic surgery. Venous flaps are a known option but the survival is limited. Arterialization of venous flap can enhance its survival. While various techniques of arterialization of venous flaps are described, there are very few studies compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggarwal, Krittika, Singh, Arun K., Halageri, Sameer M., Kumar, Vijay, Mishra, Brijesh, Upadhyay, D. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33814745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725227
_version_ 1783673440394280960
author Aggarwal, Krittika
Singh, Arun K.
Halageri, Sameer M.
Kumar, Vijay
Mishra, Brijesh
Upadhyay, D. N.
author_facet Aggarwal, Krittika
Singh, Arun K.
Halageri, Sameer M.
Kumar, Vijay
Mishra, Brijesh
Upadhyay, D. N.
author_sort Aggarwal, Krittika
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Reconstruction forms the primary tenet in plastic surgery. Venous flaps are a known option but the survival is limited. Arterialization of venous flap can enhance its survival. While various techniques of arterialization of venous flaps are described, there are very few studies comparing them. Material and methods  The current study was conducted among 34 rats weighing 160 to 200 grams. The rats were divided into four groups. Group I—islanded epigastric flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vessels as pedicle. Group II—arterialized flow through venous flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vein (SCEV) as afferent and lateral thoracic vein as drainage vein. Side-to-side anastomosis was done between femoral artery and vein, lateral to the origin of superficial caudal epigastric artery. Group III—after raising the flap, as in group II, femoral vein was ligated proximal to superficial caudal epigastric vessels. Group IV—an arterialized flow through venous flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vein as afferent and lateral thoracic vein as drainage vein. End-to-side anastomosis was done between femoral artery and superficial caudal epigastric vein. Animals that died before completion of the study were excluded. The color changes of flaps were noted. Flap survival was expressed as a percentage of the total flap surface area. The patency of anastomosis was seen on postoperative day 5. Results  There was no total flap failure. On statical analysis, the flap survival area on day 5 between Group I and Group IV was not significant ( p value 0.431). The survival area in Group I (78.85 ± 10.54%) was comparable to Group IV (65.71 ± 20.70%). Group II and III had poor results as compared with Group I. In four rats, thrombosis of arteriovenous anastomosis was noted with flap survival area of 30 to 33%. Conclusion  It was noted that epigastric venous flaps with end-to-side anastomosis between femoral artery and superficial caudal epigastric vein (group IV) have survival area comparable to islanded flaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8012788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80127882021-04-02 Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats Aggarwal, Krittika Singh, Arun K. Halageri, Sameer M. Kumar, Vijay Mishra, Brijesh Upadhyay, D. N. Indian J Plast Surg Introduction  Reconstruction forms the primary tenet in plastic surgery. Venous flaps are a known option but the survival is limited. Arterialization of venous flap can enhance its survival. While various techniques of arterialization of venous flaps are described, there are very few studies comparing them. Material and methods  The current study was conducted among 34 rats weighing 160 to 200 grams. The rats were divided into four groups. Group I—islanded epigastric flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vessels as pedicle. Group II—arterialized flow through venous flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vein (SCEV) as afferent and lateral thoracic vein as drainage vein. Side-to-side anastomosis was done between femoral artery and vein, lateral to the origin of superficial caudal epigastric artery. Group III—after raising the flap, as in group II, femoral vein was ligated proximal to superficial caudal epigastric vessels. Group IV—an arterialized flow through venous flap was raised with superficial caudal epigastric vein as afferent and lateral thoracic vein as drainage vein. End-to-side anastomosis was done between femoral artery and superficial caudal epigastric vein. Animals that died before completion of the study were excluded. The color changes of flaps were noted. Flap survival was expressed as a percentage of the total flap surface area. The patency of anastomosis was seen on postoperative day 5. Results  There was no total flap failure. On statical analysis, the flap survival area on day 5 between Group I and Group IV was not significant ( p value 0.431). The survival area in Group I (78.85 ± 10.54%) was comparable to Group IV (65.71 ± 20.70%). Group II and III had poor results as compared with Group I. In four rats, thrombosis of arteriovenous anastomosis was noted with flap survival area of 30 to 33%. Conclusion  It was noted that epigastric venous flaps with end-to-side anastomosis between femoral artery and superficial caudal epigastric vein (group IV) have survival area comparable to islanded flaps. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-01 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8012788/ /pubmed/33814745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725227 Text en Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Aggarwal, Krittika
Singh, Arun K.
Halageri, Sameer M.
Kumar, Vijay
Mishra, Brijesh
Upadhyay, D. N.
Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title_full Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title_fullStr Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title_short Evaluation of Role of Arterialization of Venous Flaps in Abdomen in Rats
title_sort evaluation of role of arterialization of venous flaps in abdomen in rats
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33814745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725227
work_keys_str_mv AT aggarwalkrittika evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats
AT singharunk evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats
AT halagerisameerm evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats
AT kumarvijay evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats
AT mishrabrijesh evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats
AT upadhyaydn evaluationofroleofarterializationofvenousflapsinabdomeninrats