Cargando…

Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rana, Rimpi, Kumawat, Devesh, Sahay, Pranita, Gour, Neeraj, Patel, Siddharth, Samanta, Ramanuj, Singh, Anupam, Mittal, Sanjeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727465
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20
_version_ 1783673473832321024
author Rana, Rimpi
Kumawat, Devesh
Sahay, Pranita
Gour, Neeraj
Patel, Siddharth
Samanta, Ramanuj
Singh, Anupam
Mittal, Sanjeev
author_facet Rana, Rimpi
Kumawat, Devesh
Sahay, Pranita
Gour, Neeraj
Patel, Siddharth
Samanta, Ramanuj
Singh, Anupam
Mittal, Sanjeev
author_sort Rana, Rimpi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16(th) August 2020 to 31(st) August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom‘s taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. RESULTS: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8012965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80129652021-04-01 Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic Rana, Rimpi Kumawat, Devesh Sahay, Pranita Gour, Neeraj Patel, Siddharth Samanta, Ramanuj Singh, Anupam Mittal, Sanjeev Indian J Ophthalmol Expedited Publication, Original Article PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16(th) August 2020 to 31(st) August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom‘s taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. RESULTS: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-04 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8012965/ /pubmed/33727465 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Expedited Publication, Original Article
Rana, Rimpi
Kumawat, Devesh
Sahay, Pranita
Gour, Neeraj
Patel, Siddharth
Samanta, Ramanuj
Singh, Anupam
Mittal, Sanjeev
Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during covid-19 pandemic
topic Expedited Publication, Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727465
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ranarimpi perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT kumawatdevesh perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT sahaypranita perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT gourneeraj perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT patelsiddharth perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT samantaramanuj perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT singhanupam perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic
AT mittalsanjeev perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic