Cargando…
Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic
PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727465 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20 |
_version_ | 1783673473832321024 |
---|---|
author | Rana, Rimpi Kumawat, Devesh Sahay, Pranita Gour, Neeraj Patel, Siddharth Samanta, Ramanuj Singh, Anupam Mittal, Sanjeev |
author_facet | Rana, Rimpi Kumawat, Devesh Sahay, Pranita Gour, Neeraj Patel, Siddharth Samanta, Ramanuj Singh, Anupam Mittal, Sanjeev |
author_sort | Rana, Rimpi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16(th) August 2020 to 31(st) August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom‘s taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. RESULTS: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8012965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80129652021-04-01 Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic Rana, Rimpi Kumawat, Devesh Sahay, Pranita Gour, Neeraj Patel, Siddharth Samanta, Ramanuj Singh, Anupam Mittal, Sanjeev Indian J Ophthalmol Expedited Publication, Original Article PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist‘s perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16(th) August 2020 to 31(st) August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom‘s taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. RESULTS: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-04 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8012965/ /pubmed/33727465 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Expedited Publication, Original Article Rana, Rimpi Kumawat, Devesh Sahay, Pranita Gour, Neeraj Patel, Siddharth Samanta, Ramanuj Singh, Anupam Mittal, Sanjeev Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Expedited Publication, Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33727465 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3136_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranarimpi perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT kumawatdevesh perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT sahaypranita perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT gourneeraj perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT patelsiddharth perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT samantaramanuj perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT singhanupam perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic AT mittalsanjeev perceptionamongophthalmologistsaboutwebinarsasamethodofcontinuedmedicaleducationduringcovid19pandemic |