Cargando…

Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19

Since the outbreak of COVID‐19 pandemic, clinicians have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods. This has been associated with detrimental effects, especially in relation to the skin health. The present study describes a comprehensive survey of healthcare workers (HCWs)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abiakam, Nkemjika, Worsley, Peter, Jayabal, Hemalatha, Mitchell, Kay, Jones, Michaela, Fletcher, Jacqui, Spratt, Fran, Bader, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13534
_version_ 1783673480094416896
author Abiakam, Nkemjika
Worsley, Peter
Jayabal, Hemalatha
Mitchell, Kay
Jones, Michaela
Fletcher, Jacqui
Spratt, Fran
Bader, Dan
author_facet Abiakam, Nkemjika
Worsley, Peter
Jayabal, Hemalatha
Mitchell, Kay
Jones, Michaela
Fletcher, Jacqui
Spratt, Fran
Bader, Dan
author_sort Abiakam, Nkemjika
collection PubMed
description Since the outbreak of COVID‐19 pandemic, clinicians have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods. This has been associated with detrimental effects, especially in relation to the skin health. The present study describes a comprehensive survey of healthcare workers (HCWs) to describe their experiences using PPE in managing COVID‐19 patients, with a particular focus on adverse skin reactions. A 24‐hour prevalence study and multi‐centre prospective survey were designed to capture the impact of PPE on skin health of hospital staff. Questionnaires incorporated demographics of participants, PPE type, usage time, and removal frequency. Participants reported the nature and location of any corresponding adverse skin reactions. The prevalence study included all staff in intensive care from a single centre, while the prospective study used a convenience sample of staff from three acute care providers in the United Kingdom. A total of 108 staff were recruited into the prevalence study, while 307 HCWs from a variety of professional backgrounds and demographics participated in the prospective study. Various skin adverse reactions were reported for the prevalence study, with the bridge of the nose (69%) and ears (30%) being the most affected. Of the six adverse skin reactions recorded for the prospective study, the most common were redness blanching (33%), itchiness (22%), and pressure damage (12%). These occurred predominantly at the bridge of the nose and the ears. There were significant associations (P < .05) between the adverse skin reactions with both the average daily time of PPE usage and the frequency of PPE relief. The comprehensive study revealed that the use of PPE leads to an array of skin reactions at various facial locations of HCWs. Improvements in guidelines are required for PPE usage to protect skin health. In addition, modifications to PPE designs are required to accommodate a range of face shapes and appropriate materials to improve device safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8013193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80131932021-04-01 Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19 Abiakam, Nkemjika Worsley, Peter Jayabal, Hemalatha Mitchell, Kay Jones, Michaela Fletcher, Jacqui Spratt, Fran Bader, Dan Int Wound J Original Articles Since the outbreak of COVID‐19 pandemic, clinicians have had to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods. This has been associated with detrimental effects, especially in relation to the skin health. The present study describes a comprehensive survey of healthcare workers (HCWs) to describe their experiences using PPE in managing COVID‐19 patients, with a particular focus on adverse skin reactions. A 24‐hour prevalence study and multi‐centre prospective survey were designed to capture the impact of PPE on skin health of hospital staff. Questionnaires incorporated demographics of participants, PPE type, usage time, and removal frequency. Participants reported the nature and location of any corresponding adverse skin reactions. The prevalence study included all staff in intensive care from a single centre, while the prospective study used a convenience sample of staff from three acute care providers in the United Kingdom. A total of 108 staff were recruited into the prevalence study, while 307 HCWs from a variety of professional backgrounds and demographics participated in the prospective study. Various skin adverse reactions were reported for the prevalence study, with the bridge of the nose (69%) and ears (30%) being the most affected. Of the six adverse skin reactions recorded for the prospective study, the most common were redness blanching (33%), itchiness (22%), and pressure damage (12%). These occurred predominantly at the bridge of the nose and the ears. There were significant associations (P < .05) between the adverse skin reactions with both the average daily time of PPE usage and the frequency of PPE relief. The comprehensive study revealed that the use of PPE leads to an array of skin reactions at various facial locations of HCWs. Improvements in guidelines are required for PPE usage to protect skin health. In addition, modifications to PPE designs are required to accommodate a range of face shapes and appropriate materials to improve device safety. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8013193/ /pubmed/33507634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13534 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abiakam, Nkemjika
Worsley, Peter
Jayabal, Hemalatha
Mitchell, Kay
Jones, Michaela
Fletcher, Jacqui
Spratt, Fran
Bader, Dan
Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title_full Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title_fullStr Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title_full_unstemmed Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title_short Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID‐19
title_sort personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during covid‐19
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13534
work_keys_str_mv AT abiakamnkemjika personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT worsleypeter personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT jayabalhemalatha personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT mitchellkay personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT jonesmichaela personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT fletcherjacqui personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT sprattfran personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19
AT baderdan personalprotectiveequipmentrelatedskinreactionsinhealthcareprofessionalsduringcovid19