Cargando…
Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063 |
_version_ | 1783673506572009472 |
---|---|
author | Yong, Yee Vern Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya Lajis, Rosliza Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi |
author_facet | Yong, Yee Vern Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya Lajis, Rosliza Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi |
author_sort | Yong, Yee Vern |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8013673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80136732021-04-13 Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? Yong, Yee Vern Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya Lajis, Rosliza Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi MDM Policy Pract Original Article Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed. SAGE Publications 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8013673/ /pubmed/33855190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yong, Yee Vern Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya Lajis, Rosliza Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title | Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title_full | Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title_fullStr | Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title_short | Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? |
title_sort | development and practical application of a multiple-criteria decision analysis framework on respiratory inhalers: is it always useful in the moh malaysia medicines formulary listing context? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yongyeevern developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext AT mahamaddomsitihajar developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext AT ahmadsaadnurulmaya developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext AT lajisrosliza developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext AT mdyusoffaridaharyani developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext AT abdulrahamanjamalulazizi developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext |