Cargando…

Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?

Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yong, Yee Vern, Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar, Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya, Lajis, Rosliza, Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani, Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063
_version_ 1783673506572009472
author Yong, Yee Vern
Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar
Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya
Lajis, Rosliza
Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani
Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi
author_facet Yong, Yee Vern
Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar
Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya
Lajis, Rosliza
Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani
Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi
author_sort Yong, Yee Vern
collection PubMed
description Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8013673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80136732021-04-13 Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context? Yong, Yee Vern Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya Lajis, Rosliza Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi MDM Policy Pract Original Article Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed. SAGE Publications 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8013673/ /pubmed/33855190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yong, Yee Vern
Mahamad Dom, Siti Hajar
Ahmad Sa’ad, Nurulmaya
Lajis, Rosliza
Md. Yusof, Faridah Aryani
Abdul Rahaman, Jamalul Azizi
Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title_full Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title_fullStr Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title_full_unstemmed Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title_short Development and Practical Application of a Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework on Respiratory Inhalers: Is It Always Useful in the MOH Malaysia Medicines Formulary Listing Context?
title_sort development and practical application of a multiple-criteria decision analysis framework on respiratory inhalers: is it always useful in the moh malaysia medicines formulary listing context?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468321994063
work_keys_str_mv AT yongyeevern developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext
AT mahamaddomsitihajar developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext
AT ahmadsaadnurulmaya developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext
AT lajisrosliza developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext
AT mdyusoffaridaharyani developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext
AT abdulrahamanjamalulazizi developmentandpracticalapplicationofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkonrespiratoryinhalersisitalwaysusefulinthemohmalaysiamedicinesformularylistingcontext