Cargando…

The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers

Much reading research has found that informative parafoveal masks lead to a reading benefit for native speakers (see 1). However, little reading research has tested the impact of uninformative parafoveal masks during reading. Additionally, parafoveal processing research is primarily restricted to na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandez, Leigh B., Scheepers, Christoph, Allen, Shanley E.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828813
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.6.3
_version_ 1783673518996586496
author Fernandez, Leigh B.
Scheepers, Christoph
Allen, Shanley E.M.
author_facet Fernandez, Leigh B.
Scheepers, Christoph
Allen, Shanley E.M.
author_sort Fernandez, Leigh B.
collection PubMed
description Much reading research has found that informative parafoveal masks lead to a reading benefit for native speakers (see 1). However, little reading research has tested the impact of uninformative parafoveal masks during reading. Additionally, parafoveal processing research is primarily restricted to native speakers. In the current study we manipulated the type of uninformative preview using a gaze contingent boundary paradigm with a group of L1 English speakers and a group of late L2 English speakers (L1 German). We were interested in how different types of uninformative masks impact on parafoveal processing, whether L1 and L2 speakers are similarly impacted, and whether they are sensitive to parafoveally viewed language-specific sub-lexical orthographic information. We manipulated six types of uninformative masks to test these objectives: an Identical, English pseudo-word, German pseudo-word, illegal string of letters, series of X’s, and a blank mask. We found that X masks affect reading the most with slight graded differences across the other masks, L1 and L2 speakers are impacted similarly, and neither group is sensitive to sub-lexical orthographic information. Overall these data show that not all previews are equal, and research should be aware of the way uninformative masks affect reading behavior. Additionally, we hope that future research starts to approach models of eye-movement behavior during reading from not only a monolingual but also from a multilingual perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8013785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80137852021-04-06 The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers Fernandez, Leigh B. Scheepers, Christoph Allen, Shanley E.M. J Eye Mov Res Research Article Much reading research has found that informative parafoveal masks lead to a reading benefit for native speakers (see 1). However, little reading research has tested the impact of uninformative parafoveal masks during reading. Additionally, parafoveal processing research is primarily restricted to native speakers. In the current study we manipulated the type of uninformative preview using a gaze contingent boundary paradigm with a group of L1 English speakers and a group of late L2 English speakers (L1 German). We were interested in how different types of uninformative masks impact on parafoveal processing, whether L1 and L2 speakers are similarly impacted, and whether they are sensitive to parafoveally viewed language-specific sub-lexical orthographic information. We manipulated six types of uninformative masks to test these objectives: an Identical, English pseudo-word, German pseudo-word, illegal string of letters, series of X’s, and a blank mask. We found that X masks affect reading the most with slight graded differences across the other masks, L1 and L2 speakers are impacted similarly, and neither group is sensitive to sub-lexical orthographic information. Overall these data show that not all previews are equal, and research should be aware of the way uninformative masks affect reading behavior. Additionally, we hope that future research starts to approach models of eye-movement behavior during reading from not only a monolingual but also from a multilingual perspective. Bern Open Publishing 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8013785/ /pubmed/33828813 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.6.3 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fernandez, Leigh B.
Scheepers, Christoph
Allen, Shanley E.M.
The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title_full The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title_fullStr The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title_full_unstemmed The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title_short The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers
title_sort impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on l1 and late l2 speakers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828813
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.6.3
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezleighb theimpactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers
AT scheeperschristoph theimpactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers
AT allenshanleyem theimpactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers
AT fernandezleighb impactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers
AT scheeperschristoph impactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers
AT allenshanleyem impactofuninformativeparafovealmasksonl1andlatel2speakers