Cargando…
Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526 |
_version_ | 1783673522063671296 |
---|---|
author | Hoffman, Henry T. Walsh, Jarrett E. Pratt, Alessandra Miller, Robert M. Schwalje, Adam Stegall, Helen R. Nonnenmann, Matt |
author_facet | Hoffman, Henry T. Walsh, Jarrett E. Pratt, Alessandra Miller, Robert M. Schwalje, Adam Stegall, Helen R. Nonnenmann, Matt |
author_sort | Hoffman, Henry T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was performed on an additional 108 consecutive patients who were evaluated by questionnaires and sequential pulse oximetry. Further study addressed operative transnasal potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate (KTP) laser laryngoscopy with biopsy done on four patients employing the NPFS. RESULTS: The previously described NPFS version 3 (v.3), a transparent acrylic barrier with two anterior instrumentation ports, was modified by repositioning the side suction port closer to the level of the nose and deepening the lateral sides, squaring off the lower projection. A post‐procedure questionnaire employing a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from no symptoms (rating of 1) to intolerable (rating of 5) identified excellent patient tolerance of the new design (v.4), among 22 patients evaluated and similar in the comparison to the 116 patients using version 3. Among the 138 patients analyzed, only one patient rated the experience as greater than “mild claustrophobia.” 100% of patients answered either “none” or “mild” to the pain and shortness of breath questions. The NPFS (v.4) was then successfully used in four patients for laser laryngoscopy with biopsy of laryngeal papilloma (3/4) and hemorrhagic polyp (1/4). Post‐procedure questionnaire identified no shortness of breath (4/4), no claustrophobia (4/4), no pain (4/4) and no significant changes in pulse oximetry during use. CONCLUSION: Extensive experience in performing diagnostic laryngoscopy with the NPFS directed design changes leading to successful use for transnasal flexible laser laryngoscopy with biopsy in a negative pressure microenvironment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b (Cohort Study). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8013799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80137992021-04-01 Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy Hoffman, Henry T. Walsh, Jarrett E. Pratt, Alessandra Miller, Robert M. Schwalje, Adam Stegall, Helen R. Nonnenmann, Matt Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was performed on an additional 108 consecutive patients who were evaluated by questionnaires and sequential pulse oximetry. Further study addressed operative transnasal potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate (KTP) laser laryngoscopy with biopsy done on four patients employing the NPFS. RESULTS: The previously described NPFS version 3 (v.3), a transparent acrylic barrier with two anterior instrumentation ports, was modified by repositioning the side suction port closer to the level of the nose and deepening the lateral sides, squaring off the lower projection. A post‐procedure questionnaire employing a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from no symptoms (rating of 1) to intolerable (rating of 5) identified excellent patient tolerance of the new design (v.4), among 22 patients evaluated and similar in the comparison to the 116 patients using version 3. Among the 138 patients analyzed, only one patient rated the experience as greater than “mild claustrophobia.” 100% of patients answered either “none” or “mild” to the pain and shortness of breath questions. The NPFS (v.4) was then successfully used in four patients for laser laryngoscopy with biopsy of laryngeal papilloma (3/4) and hemorrhagic polyp (1/4). Post‐procedure questionnaire identified no shortness of breath (4/4), no claustrophobia (4/4), no pain (4/4) and no significant changes in pulse oximetry during use. CONCLUSION: Extensive experience in performing diagnostic laryngoscopy with the NPFS directed design changes leading to successful use for transnasal flexible laser laryngoscopy with biopsy in a negative pressure microenvironment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b (Cohort Study). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8013799/ /pubmed/33821216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Laryngology, Speech and Language Science Hoffman, Henry T. Walsh, Jarrett E. Pratt, Alessandra Miller, Robert M. Schwalje, Adam Stegall, Helen R. Nonnenmann, Matt Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title | Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title_full | Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title_fullStr | Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title_short | Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
title_sort | laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy |
topic | Laryngology, Speech and Language Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmanhenryt laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT walshjarrette laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT prattalessandra laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT millerrobertm laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT schwaljeadam laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT stegallhelenr laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy AT nonnenmannmatt laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy |