Cargando…

Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Henry T., Walsh, Jarrett E., Pratt, Alessandra, Miller, Robert M., Schwalje, Adam, Stegall, Helen R., Nonnenmann, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526
_version_ 1783673522063671296
author Hoffman, Henry T.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Pratt, Alessandra
Miller, Robert M.
Schwalje, Adam
Stegall, Helen R.
Nonnenmann, Matt
author_facet Hoffman, Henry T.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Pratt, Alessandra
Miller, Robert M.
Schwalje, Adam
Stegall, Helen R.
Nonnenmann, Matt
author_sort Hoffman, Henry T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was performed on an additional 108 consecutive patients who were evaluated by questionnaires and sequential pulse oximetry. Further study addressed operative transnasal potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate (KTP) laser laryngoscopy with biopsy done on four patients employing the NPFS. RESULTS: The previously described NPFS version 3 (v.3), a transparent acrylic barrier with two anterior instrumentation ports, was modified by repositioning the side suction port closer to the level of the nose and deepening the lateral sides, squaring off the lower projection. A post‐procedure questionnaire employing a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from no symptoms (rating of 1) to intolerable (rating of 5) identified excellent patient tolerance of the new design (v.4), among 22 patients evaluated and similar in the comparison to the 116 patients using version 3. Among the 138 patients analyzed, only one patient rated the experience as greater than “mild claustrophobia.” 100% of patients answered either “none” or “mild” to the pain and shortness of breath questions. The NPFS (v.4) was then successfully used in four patients for laser laryngoscopy with biopsy of laryngeal papilloma (3/4) and hemorrhagic polyp (1/4). Post‐procedure questionnaire identified no shortness of breath (4/4), no claustrophobia (4/4), no pain (4/4) and no significant changes in pulse oximetry during use. CONCLUSION: Extensive experience in performing diagnostic laryngoscopy with the NPFS directed design changes leading to successful use for transnasal flexible laser laryngoscopy with biopsy in a negative pressure microenvironment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b (Cohort Study).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8013799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80137992021-04-01 Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy Hoffman, Henry T. Walsh, Jarrett E. Pratt, Alessandra Miller, Robert M. Schwalje, Adam Stegall, Helen R. Nonnenmann, Matt Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a negative pressure microenvironment designed to contain laser plume during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy. METHODS: The Negative Pressure Face Shield (NPFS) was previously reported as well tolerated with initial use on 30 patients. Diagnostic transnasal laryngoscopy was performed on an additional 108 consecutive patients who were evaluated by questionnaires and sequential pulse oximetry. Further study addressed operative transnasal potassium‐titanyl‐phosphate (KTP) laser laryngoscopy with biopsy done on four patients employing the NPFS. RESULTS: The previously described NPFS version 3 (v.3), a transparent acrylic barrier with two anterior instrumentation ports, was modified by repositioning the side suction port closer to the level of the nose and deepening the lateral sides, squaring off the lower projection. A post‐procedure questionnaire employing a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from no symptoms (rating of 1) to intolerable (rating of 5) identified excellent patient tolerance of the new design (v.4), among 22 patients evaluated and similar in the comparison to the 116 patients using version 3. Among the 138 patients analyzed, only one patient rated the experience as greater than “mild claustrophobia.” 100% of patients answered either “none” or “mild” to the pain and shortness of breath questions. The NPFS (v.4) was then successfully used in four patients for laser laryngoscopy with biopsy of laryngeal papilloma (3/4) and hemorrhagic polyp (1/4). Post‐procedure questionnaire identified no shortness of breath (4/4), no claustrophobia (4/4), no pain (4/4) and no significant changes in pulse oximetry during use. CONCLUSION: Extensive experience in performing diagnostic laryngoscopy with the NPFS directed design changes leading to successful use for transnasal flexible laser laryngoscopy with biopsy in a negative pressure microenvironment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b (Cohort Study). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8013799/ /pubmed/33821216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
Hoffman, Henry T.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Pratt, Alessandra
Miller, Robert M.
Schwalje, Adam
Stegall, Helen R.
Nonnenmann, Matt
Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title_full Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title_fullStr Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title_short Laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
title_sort laser plume containment during flexible transnasal laryngoscopy
topic Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8013799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33821216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.526
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanhenryt laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT walshjarrette laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT prattalessandra laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT millerrobertm laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT schwaljeadam laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT stegallhelenr laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy
AT nonnenmannmatt laserplumecontainmentduringflexibletransnasallaryngoscopy