Cargando…
Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci q...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796 |
_version_ | 1783673544257830912 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Yang Tian, Hongli Wang, Rui Wang, Lu Yi, Hongmei Liu, Yawei Xu, Liwen Fan, Yaming Zhao, Jiuran Wang, Fengge |
author_facet | Yang, Yang Tian, Hongli Wang, Rui Wang, Lu Yi, Hongmei Liu, Yawei Xu, Liwen Fan, Yaming Zhao, Jiuran Wang, Fengge |
author_sort | Yang, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci quality and the second to reduce loci quantity. To reduce loci quantity, an appraisal index that is very sensitive to a specific scenario is necessary to select loci combinations. In this study, we focused on loci combination screening for plant variety discrimination. A loci combination appraisal index, variety discrimination power (VDP), is proposed, and three statistical methods, probability-based VDP (P-VDP), comparison-based VDP (C-VDP), and ratio-based VDP (R-VDP), are described and compared. The results using the simulated data showed that VDP was sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward the same variety, and the total probability of discrimination power (TDP) method was effective only for partial populations. R-VDP was more sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward various varieties than P-VDP and C-VDP, which both had the same sensitivity; TDP was not sensitive at all. With the real data, R-VDP values for sorghum, wheat, maize and rice data begin to show downward tendency when the number of loci is 20, 7, 100, 100 respectively, while in the case of P-VDP and C-VDP (which have the same results), the number is 6, 4, 9, 19 respectively and in the case of TDP, the number is 6, 4, 4, 11 respectively. For the variety threshold setting, R-VDP values of loci combinations with different numbers of loci responded evenly to different thresholds. C-VDP values responded unevenly to different thresholds, and the extent of the response increased as the number of loci decreased. All the methods gave underestimations when data were missing, with systematic errors for TDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP going from smallest to biggest. We concluded that VDP was a better loci combination appraisal index than TDP for plant variety discrimination and the three VDP methods have different applications. We developed the software called VDPtools, which can calculate the values of TDP, P-VDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP. VDPtools is publicly available at https://github.com/caurwx1/VDPtools.git. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8014032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80140322021-04-02 Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination Yang, Yang Tian, Hongli Wang, Rui Wang, Lu Yi, Hongmei Liu, Yawei Xu, Liwen Fan, Yaming Zhao, Jiuran Wang, Fengge Front Plant Sci Plant Science Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci quality and the second to reduce loci quantity. To reduce loci quantity, an appraisal index that is very sensitive to a specific scenario is necessary to select loci combinations. In this study, we focused on loci combination screening for plant variety discrimination. A loci combination appraisal index, variety discrimination power (VDP), is proposed, and three statistical methods, probability-based VDP (P-VDP), comparison-based VDP (C-VDP), and ratio-based VDP (R-VDP), are described and compared. The results using the simulated data showed that VDP was sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward the same variety, and the total probability of discrimination power (TDP) method was effective only for partial populations. R-VDP was more sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward various varieties than P-VDP and C-VDP, which both had the same sensitivity; TDP was not sensitive at all. With the real data, R-VDP values for sorghum, wheat, maize and rice data begin to show downward tendency when the number of loci is 20, 7, 100, 100 respectively, while in the case of P-VDP and C-VDP (which have the same results), the number is 6, 4, 9, 19 respectively and in the case of TDP, the number is 6, 4, 4, 11 respectively. For the variety threshold setting, R-VDP values of loci combinations with different numbers of loci responded evenly to different thresholds. C-VDP values responded unevenly to different thresholds, and the extent of the response increased as the number of loci decreased. All the methods gave underestimations when data were missing, with systematic errors for TDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP going from smallest to biggest. We concluded that VDP was a better loci combination appraisal index than TDP for plant variety discrimination and the three VDP methods have different applications. We developed the software called VDPtools, which can calculate the values of TDP, P-VDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP. VDPtools is publicly available at https://github.com/caurwx1/VDPtools.git. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8014032/ /pubmed/33815430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yang, Tian, Wang, Wang, Yi, Liu, Xu, Fan, Zhao and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Yang, Yang Tian, Hongli Wang, Rui Wang, Lu Yi, Hongmei Liu, Yawei Xu, Liwen Fan, Yaming Zhao, Jiuran Wang, Fengge Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title | Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title_full | Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title_fullStr | Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title_full_unstemmed | Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title_short | Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination |
title_sort | variety discrimination power: an appraisal index for loci combination screening applied to plant variety discrimination |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangyang varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT tianhongli varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT wangrui varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT wanglu varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT yihongmei varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT liuyawei varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT xuliwen varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT fanyaming varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT zhaojiuran varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination AT wangfengge varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination |