Cargando…

Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination

Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yang, Tian, Hongli, Wang, Rui, Wang, Lu, Yi, Hongmei, Liu, Yawei, Xu, Liwen, Fan, Yaming, Zhao, Jiuran, Wang, Fengge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796
_version_ 1783673544257830912
author Yang, Yang
Tian, Hongli
Wang, Rui
Wang, Lu
Yi, Hongmei
Liu, Yawei
Xu, Liwen
Fan, Yaming
Zhao, Jiuran
Wang, Fengge
author_facet Yang, Yang
Tian, Hongli
Wang, Rui
Wang, Lu
Yi, Hongmei
Liu, Yawei
Xu, Liwen
Fan, Yaming
Zhao, Jiuran
Wang, Fengge
author_sort Yang, Yang
collection PubMed
description Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci quality and the second to reduce loci quantity. To reduce loci quantity, an appraisal index that is very sensitive to a specific scenario is necessary to select loci combinations. In this study, we focused on loci combination screening for plant variety discrimination. A loci combination appraisal index, variety discrimination power (VDP), is proposed, and three statistical methods, probability-based VDP (P-VDP), comparison-based VDP (C-VDP), and ratio-based VDP (R-VDP), are described and compared. The results using the simulated data showed that VDP was sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward the same variety, and the total probability of discrimination power (TDP) method was effective only for partial populations. R-VDP was more sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward various varieties than P-VDP and C-VDP, which both had the same sensitivity; TDP was not sensitive at all. With the real data, R-VDP values for sorghum, wheat, maize and rice data begin to show downward tendency when the number of loci is 20, 7, 100, 100 respectively, while in the case of P-VDP and C-VDP (which have the same results), the number is 6, 4, 9, 19 respectively and in the case of TDP, the number is 6, 4, 4, 11 respectively. For the variety threshold setting, R-VDP values of loci combinations with different numbers of loci responded evenly to different thresholds. C-VDP values responded unevenly to different thresholds, and the extent of the response increased as the number of loci decreased. All the methods gave underestimations when data were missing, with systematic errors for TDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP going from smallest to biggest. We concluded that VDP was a better loci combination appraisal index than TDP for plant variety discrimination and the three VDP methods have different applications. We developed the software called VDPtools, which can calculate the values of TDP, P-VDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP. VDPtools is publicly available at https://github.com/caurwx1/VDPtools.git.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8014032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80140322021-04-02 Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination Yang, Yang Tian, Hongli Wang, Rui Wang, Lu Yi, Hongmei Liu, Yawei Xu, Liwen Fan, Yaming Zhao, Jiuran Wang, Fengge Front Plant Sci Plant Science Molecular marker technology is used widely in plant variety discrimination, molecular breeding, and other fields. To lower the cost of testing and improve the efficiency of data analysis, molecular marker screening is very important. Screening usually involves two phases: the first to control loci quality and the second to reduce loci quantity. To reduce loci quantity, an appraisal index that is very sensitive to a specific scenario is necessary to select loci combinations. In this study, we focused on loci combination screening for plant variety discrimination. A loci combination appraisal index, variety discrimination power (VDP), is proposed, and three statistical methods, probability-based VDP (P-VDP), comparison-based VDP (C-VDP), and ratio-based VDP (R-VDP), are described and compared. The results using the simulated data showed that VDP was sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward the same variety, and the total probability of discrimination power (TDP) method was effective only for partial populations. R-VDP was more sensitive to statistical populations with convergence toward various varieties than P-VDP and C-VDP, which both had the same sensitivity; TDP was not sensitive at all. With the real data, R-VDP values for sorghum, wheat, maize and rice data begin to show downward tendency when the number of loci is 20, 7, 100, 100 respectively, while in the case of P-VDP and C-VDP (which have the same results), the number is 6, 4, 9, 19 respectively and in the case of TDP, the number is 6, 4, 4, 11 respectively. For the variety threshold setting, R-VDP values of loci combinations with different numbers of loci responded evenly to different thresholds. C-VDP values responded unevenly to different thresholds, and the extent of the response increased as the number of loci decreased. All the methods gave underestimations when data were missing, with systematic errors for TDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP going from smallest to biggest. We concluded that VDP was a better loci combination appraisal index than TDP for plant variety discrimination and the three VDP methods have different applications. We developed the software called VDPtools, which can calculate the values of TDP, P-VDP, C-VDP, and R-VDP. VDPtools is publicly available at https://github.com/caurwx1/VDPtools.git. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8014032/ /pubmed/33815430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yang, Tian, Wang, Wang, Yi, Liu, Xu, Fan, Zhao and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Yang, Yang
Tian, Hongli
Wang, Rui
Wang, Lu
Yi, Hongmei
Liu, Yawei
Xu, Liwen
Fan, Yaming
Zhao, Jiuran
Wang, Fengge
Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title_full Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title_fullStr Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title_short Variety Discrimination Power: An Appraisal Index for Loci Combination Screening Applied to Plant Variety Discrimination
title_sort variety discrimination power: an appraisal index for loci combination screening applied to plant variety discrimination
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.566796
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyang varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT tianhongli varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT wangrui varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT wanglu varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT yihongmei varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT liuyawei varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT xuliwen varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT fanyaming varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT zhaojiuran varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination
AT wangfengge varietydiscriminationpoweranappraisalindexforlocicombinationscreeningappliedtoplantvarietydiscrimination