Cargando…

Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests

With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strand, Rasmus, Thelaus, Louise, Fernström, Nils, Sunnerhagen, Torgny, Lindroth, Ylva, Linder, Adam, Rasmussen, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913
_version_ 1783673560001150976
author Strand, Rasmus
Thelaus, Louise
Fernström, Nils
Sunnerhagen, Torgny
Lindroth, Ylva
Linder, Adam
Rasmussen, Magnus
author_facet Strand, Rasmus
Thelaus, Louise
Fernström, Nils
Sunnerhagen, Torgny
Lindroth, Ylva
Linder, Adam
Rasmussen, Magnus
author_sort Strand, Rasmus
collection PubMed
description With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of the performance of such tests is needed if they are to be used in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated three POC antibody tests. Convalescent serum samples from 47 reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) verified patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) collected at least 28 days post RT‐PCR diagnosis as well as 50 negative pre‐COVID‐19 controls were tested. The three tests (denoted the J‐, N‐, and Z‐tests) displayed the sensitivities of 87%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, for the detection of IgG. All tests had the same specificity for IgG (98%). The tests did not differ significantly for the detection of IgG. The sensitivities for IgM were lower (15%, 67%, and 70%) and the specificities were 90%, 98%, and 90%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were similar among the tests. Our results indicate that these POC antibody tests might be accurate enough to use in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8014463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80144632021-04-01 Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests Strand, Rasmus Thelaus, Louise Fernström, Nils Sunnerhagen, Torgny Lindroth, Ylva Linder, Adam Rasmussen, Magnus J Med Virol Short Communications With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of the performance of such tests is needed if they are to be used in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated three POC antibody tests. Convalescent serum samples from 47 reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) verified patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) collected at least 28 days post RT‐PCR diagnosis as well as 50 negative pre‐COVID‐19 controls were tested. The three tests (denoted the J‐, N‐, and Z‐tests) displayed the sensitivities of 87%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, for the detection of IgG. All tests had the same specificity for IgG (98%). The tests did not differ significantly for the detection of IgG. The sensitivities for IgM were lower (15%, 67%, and 70%) and the specificities were 90%, 98%, and 90%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were similar among the tests. Our results indicate that these POC antibody tests might be accurate enough to use in routine clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-03 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8014463/ /pubmed/33666238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Strand, Rasmus
Thelaus, Louise
Fernström, Nils
Sunnerhagen, Torgny
Lindroth, Ylva
Linder, Adam
Rasmussen, Magnus
Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title_full Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title_fullStr Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title_full_unstemmed Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title_short Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
title_sort rapid diagnostic testing for sars‐cov‐2: validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913
work_keys_str_mv AT strandrasmus rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT thelauslouise rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT fernstromnils rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT sunnerhagentorgny rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT lindrothylva rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT linderadam rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests
AT rasmussenmagnus rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests