Cargando…
Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests
With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913 |
_version_ | 1783673560001150976 |
---|---|
author | Strand, Rasmus Thelaus, Louise Fernström, Nils Sunnerhagen, Torgny Lindroth, Ylva Linder, Adam Rasmussen, Magnus |
author_facet | Strand, Rasmus Thelaus, Louise Fernström, Nils Sunnerhagen, Torgny Lindroth, Ylva Linder, Adam Rasmussen, Magnus |
author_sort | Strand, Rasmus |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of the performance of such tests is needed if they are to be used in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated three POC antibody tests. Convalescent serum samples from 47 reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) verified patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) collected at least 28 days post RT‐PCR diagnosis as well as 50 negative pre‐COVID‐19 controls were tested. The three tests (denoted the J‐, N‐, and Z‐tests) displayed the sensitivities of 87%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, for the detection of IgG. All tests had the same specificity for IgG (98%). The tests did not differ significantly for the detection of IgG. The sensitivities for IgM were lower (15%, 67%, and 70%) and the specificities were 90%, 98%, and 90%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were similar among the tests. Our results indicate that these POC antibody tests might be accurate enough to use in routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8014463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80144632021-04-01 Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests Strand, Rasmus Thelaus, Louise Fernström, Nils Sunnerhagen, Torgny Lindroth, Ylva Linder, Adam Rasmussen, Magnus J Med Virol Short Communications With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a need for diagnostic tests has surfaced. Point‐of‐care (POC) antibody tests can detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G and M against SARS‐CoV‐2 in serum, plasma, or whole blood and give results within 15 min. Validation of the performance of such tests is needed if they are to be used in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated three POC antibody tests. Convalescent serum samples from 47 reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) verified patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) collected at least 28 days post RT‐PCR diagnosis as well as 50 negative pre‐COVID‐19 controls were tested. The three tests (denoted the J‐, N‐, and Z‐tests) displayed the sensitivities of 87%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, for the detection of IgG. All tests had the same specificity for IgG (98%). The tests did not differ significantly for the detection of IgG. The sensitivities for IgM were lower (15%, 67%, and 70%) and the specificities were 90%, 98%, and 90%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were similar among the tests. Our results indicate that these POC antibody tests might be accurate enough to use in routine clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-03 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8014463/ /pubmed/33666238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Strand, Rasmus Thelaus, Louise Fernström, Nils Sunnerhagen, Torgny Lindroth, Ylva Linder, Adam Rasmussen, Magnus Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title | Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title_full | Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title_fullStr | Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title_short | Rapid diagnostic testing for SARS‐CoV‐2: Validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
title_sort | rapid diagnostic testing for sars‐cov‐2: validation and comparison of three point‐of‐care antibody tests |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26913 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strandrasmus rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT thelauslouise rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT fernstromnils rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT sunnerhagentorgny rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT lindrothylva rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT linderadam rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests AT rasmussenmagnus rapiddiagnostictestingforsarscov2validationandcomparisonofthreepointofcareantibodytests |