Cargando…

Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany

Recent studies showed that the COVID‐19 pandemic caused collateral damage in health care in terms of reduced hospital submissions or postponed treatment of other acute or chronic ill patients. An anonymous survey was sent out by mail to patients with chronic wounds in order to evaluate the impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlager, Justin Gabriel, Kendziora, Benjamin, Patzak, Leilah, Kupf, Sophie, Rothenberger, Christoph, Fiocco, Zeno, French, Lars E., Reinholz, Markus, Hartmann, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33554436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13553
_version_ 1783673575676313600
author Schlager, Justin Gabriel
Kendziora, Benjamin
Patzak, Leilah
Kupf, Sophie
Rothenberger, Christoph
Fiocco, Zeno
French, Lars E.
Reinholz, Markus
Hartmann, Daniela
author_facet Schlager, Justin Gabriel
Kendziora, Benjamin
Patzak, Leilah
Kupf, Sophie
Rothenberger, Christoph
Fiocco, Zeno
French, Lars E.
Reinholz, Markus
Hartmann, Daniela
author_sort Schlager, Justin Gabriel
collection PubMed
description Recent studies showed that the COVID‐19 pandemic caused collateral damage in health care in terms of reduced hospital submissions or postponed treatment of other acute or chronic ill patients. An anonymous survey was sent out by mail to patients with chronic wounds in order to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on wound care. Sixty‐three patients returned the survey. In 14%, diagnostic workup or hospitalisation was cancelled or postponed. Thirty‐six percent could not seek consultation by their primary care physician as usual. The use of public transport or long travel time was not related to limited access to medical service (P = .583). In ambulatory care, there was neither a significant difference in the frequency of changing wound dressings (P = .67), nor in the person, who performed wound care (P = .39). There were no significant changes in wound‐specific quality of life (P = .505). No patient used telemedicine in order to avoid face‐to‐face contact or anticipate to pandemic‐related restrictions. The COVID‐19 pandemic impaired access to clinical management of chronic wounds in Germany. It had no significant impact on ambulatory care or wound‐related quality of life. Telemedicine still plays a negligible role in wound care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8014846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80148462021-04-01 Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany Schlager, Justin Gabriel Kendziora, Benjamin Patzak, Leilah Kupf, Sophie Rothenberger, Christoph Fiocco, Zeno French, Lars E. Reinholz, Markus Hartmann, Daniela Int Wound J Original Articles Recent studies showed that the COVID‐19 pandemic caused collateral damage in health care in terms of reduced hospital submissions or postponed treatment of other acute or chronic ill patients. An anonymous survey was sent out by mail to patients with chronic wounds in order to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on wound care. Sixty‐three patients returned the survey. In 14%, diagnostic workup or hospitalisation was cancelled or postponed. Thirty‐six percent could not seek consultation by their primary care physician as usual. The use of public transport or long travel time was not related to limited access to medical service (P = .583). In ambulatory care, there was neither a significant difference in the frequency of changing wound dressings (P = .67), nor in the person, who performed wound care (P = .39). There were no significant changes in wound‐specific quality of life (P = .505). No patient used telemedicine in order to avoid face‐to‐face contact or anticipate to pandemic‐related restrictions. The COVID‐19 pandemic impaired access to clinical management of chronic wounds in Germany. It had no significant impact on ambulatory care or wound‐related quality of life. Telemedicine still plays a negligible role in wound care. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8014846/ /pubmed/33554436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13553 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schlager, Justin Gabriel
Kendziora, Benjamin
Patzak, Leilah
Kupf, Sophie
Rothenberger, Christoph
Fiocco, Zeno
French, Lars E.
Reinholz, Markus
Hartmann, Daniela
Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title_full Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title_fullStr Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title_short Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany
title_sort impact of covid‐19 on wound care in germany
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8014846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33554436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13553
work_keys_str_mv AT schlagerjustingabriel impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT kendziorabenjamin impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT patzakleilah impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT kupfsophie impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT rothenbergerchristoph impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT fioccozeno impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT frenchlarse impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT reinholzmarkus impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany
AT hartmanndaniela impactofcovid19onwoundcareingermany