Cargando…

Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta represents a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality affecting 0.5–3% of all vaginal deliveries. The unpredictability of this condition makes difficult to develop predictive and preventive strategies to apply in clinical practice. This analysis collected and analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Favilli, Alessandro, Tosto, Valentina, Ceccobelli, Margherita, Parazzini, Fabio, Franchi, Massimo, Bini, Vittorio, Gerli, Sandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8015016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03721-9
_version_ 1783673599919390720
author Favilli, Alessandro
Tosto, Valentina
Ceccobelli, Margherita
Parazzini, Fabio
Franchi, Massimo
Bini, Vittorio
Gerli, Sandro
author_facet Favilli, Alessandro
Tosto, Valentina
Ceccobelli, Margherita
Parazzini, Fabio
Franchi, Massimo
Bini, Vittorio
Gerli, Sandro
author_sort Favilli, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retained placenta represents a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality affecting 0.5–3% of all vaginal deliveries. The unpredictability of this condition makes difficult to develop predictive and preventive strategies to apply in clinical practice. This analysis collected and analyzed all known risk factors related to this obstetric complication. METHODS: A systematic literature review for all original research articles published between 1990 and 2020 was performed. Observational studies about retained placenta risk factors published in English language were considered eligible. Conference abstracts, untraceable articles and studies focused on morbidly adherent placenta were excluded. The included articles were screened to identify study design, number of enrolled patients and retained placenta risk factors investigated. All stages of the revision followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported retained placenta prevalence ranged from 0.5 to 4.8%. Maternal age, previous cesarean sections, previous dilation and curettage, previous retained placenta, labor induction, resulted as the most recurrent, independent risk factors for retained placenta. Previous estro-progestins therapy, morphological placental features (weight, shape, insertion of umbilical cord, implantation site), endometriosis, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Apgar score are fascinating new proposal risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Old and new data are not enough robust to draw firm conclusions. Prospective and well-designed studies, based on a well agreed internationally retained placenta definition, are needed in order to clarify this potential dramatic and life-threatening condition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03721-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8015016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80150162021-04-01 Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review Favilli, Alessandro Tosto, Valentina Ceccobelli, Margherita Parazzini, Fabio Franchi, Massimo Bini, Vittorio Gerli, Sandro BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Retained placenta represents a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality affecting 0.5–3% of all vaginal deliveries. The unpredictability of this condition makes difficult to develop predictive and preventive strategies to apply in clinical practice. This analysis collected and analyzed all known risk factors related to this obstetric complication. METHODS: A systematic literature review for all original research articles published between 1990 and 2020 was performed. Observational studies about retained placenta risk factors published in English language were considered eligible. Conference abstracts, untraceable articles and studies focused on morbidly adherent placenta were excluded. The included articles were screened to identify study design, number of enrolled patients and retained placenta risk factors investigated. All stages of the revision followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported retained placenta prevalence ranged from 0.5 to 4.8%. Maternal age, previous cesarean sections, previous dilation and curettage, previous retained placenta, labor induction, resulted as the most recurrent, independent risk factors for retained placenta. Previous estro-progestins therapy, morphological placental features (weight, shape, insertion of umbilical cord, implantation site), endometriosis, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Apgar score are fascinating new proposal risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Old and new data are not enough robust to draw firm conclusions. Prospective and well-designed studies, based on a well agreed internationally retained placenta definition, are needed in order to clarify this potential dramatic and life-threatening condition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03721-9. BioMed Central 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8015016/ /pubmed/33789611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03721-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Favilli, Alessandro
Tosto, Valentina
Ceccobelli, Margherita
Parazzini, Fabio
Franchi, Massimo
Bini, Vittorio
Gerli, Sandro
Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title_full Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title_short Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
title_sort risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8015016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03721-9
work_keys_str_mv AT favillialessandro riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT tostovalentina riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT ceccobellimargherita riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT parazzinifabio riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT franchimassimo riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT binivittorio riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview
AT gerlisandro riskfactorsfornonadherentretainedplacentaaftervaginaldeliveryasystematicreview