Cargando…
Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153 |
_version_ | 1783673782273048576 |
---|---|
author | Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Abomo, Pierre Amegee Quach, Jessica Begg, Sara Ding, Yan El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda |
author_facet | Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Abomo, Pierre Amegee Quach, Jessica Begg, Sara Ding, Yan El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda |
author_sort | Pulford, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing parties and programme evaluators, to guide decision-making in lieu of largely as yet unavailable empirical evidence. The first conceptual tool guides decision-making regarding RCS intervention design, focusing specifically on the combination and integration of potential intervention activities. The second conceptual tool provides a framework for assessing the implementation challenges of potential RCS interventions in terms of: (1) the overall cost of implementing the proposed intervention in a given context; (2) the length of time required to complete full implementation of the proposed intervention in a given context and (3) the level of control the implementing partners would have over the proposed intervention in a given context. The third conceptual tool provides a means to consider the anticipated impact of potential RCS interventions in order to inform selection decisions (ie, which out of a number of potential RCS intervention options may be most impactful in a given setting given the intervention design and implementation challenges). The fourth and final tool is designed to support the evaluation of a collective RCS effort, whether that be multiple RCS interventions delivered within the context of a single or continuous programme or multiple RCS programmes delivered in a common setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8016073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80160732021-04-21 Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Abomo, Pierre Amegee Quach, Jessica Begg, Sara Ding, Yan El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda BMJ Glob Health Practice This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing parties and programme evaluators, to guide decision-making in lieu of largely as yet unavailable empirical evidence. The first conceptual tool guides decision-making regarding RCS intervention design, focusing specifically on the combination and integration of potential intervention activities. The second conceptual tool provides a framework for assessing the implementation challenges of potential RCS interventions in terms of: (1) the overall cost of implementing the proposed intervention in a given context; (2) the length of time required to complete full implementation of the proposed intervention in a given context and (3) the level of control the implementing partners would have over the proposed intervention in a given context. The third conceptual tool provides a means to consider the anticipated impact of potential RCS interventions in order to inform selection decisions (ie, which out of a number of potential RCS intervention options may be most impactful in a given setting given the intervention design and implementation challenges). The fourth and final tool is designed to support the evaluation of a collective RCS effort, whether that be multiple RCS interventions delivered within the context of a single or continuous programme or multiple RCS programmes delivered in a common setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8016073/ /pubmed/33789870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Practice Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Abomo, Pierre Amegee Quach, Jessica Begg, Sara Ding, Yan El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title | Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title_full | Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title_fullStr | Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title_short | Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
title_sort | guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions |
topic | Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pulfordjustin guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT crossmansusie guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT abomopierre guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT amegeequachjessica guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT beggsara guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT dingyan guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT elhajjtaghreed guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions AT batesimelda guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions |