Cargando…

Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions

This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulford, Justin, Crossman, Susie, Abomo, Pierre, Amegee Quach, Jessica, Begg, Sara, Ding, Yan, El Hajj, Taghreed, Bates, Imelda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153
_version_ 1783673782273048576
author Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Abomo, Pierre
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Begg, Sara
Ding, Yan
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
author_facet Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Abomo, Pierre
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Begg, Sara
Ding, Yan
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
author_sort Pulford, Justin
collection PubMed
description This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing parties and programme evaluators, to guide decision-making in lieu of largely as yet unavailable empirical evidence. The first conceptual tool guides decision-making regarding RCS intervention design, focusing specifically on the combination and integration of potential intervention activities. The second conceptual tool provides a framework for assessing the implementation challenges of potential RCS interventions in terms of: (1) the overall cost of implementing the proposed intervention in a given context; (2) the length of time required to complete full implementation of the proposed intervention in a given context and (3) the level of control the implementing partners would have over the proposed intervention in a given context. The third conceptual tool provides a means to consider the anticipated impact of potential RCS interventions in order to inform selection decisions (ie, which out of a number of potential RCS intervention options may be most impactful in a given setting given the intervention design and implementation challenges). The fourth and final tool is designed to support the evaluation of a collective RCS effort, whether that be multiple RCS interventions delivered within the context of a single or continuous programme or multiple RCS programmes delivered in a common setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80160732021-04-21 Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions Pulford, Justin Crossman, Susie Abomo, Pierre Amegee Quach, Jessica Begg, Sara Ding, Yan El Hajj, Taghreed Bates, Imelda BMJ Glob Health Practice This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing parties and programme evaluators, to guide decision-making in lieu of largely as yet unavailable empirical evidence. The first conceptual tool guides decision-making regarding RCS intervention design, focusing specifically on the combination and integration of potential intervention activities. The second conceptual tool provides a framework for assessing the implementation challenges of potential RCS interventions in terms of: (1) the overall cost of implementing the proposed intervention in a given context; (2) the length of time required to complete full implementation of the proposed intervention in a given context and (3) the level of control the implementing partners would have over the proposed intervention in a given context. The third conceptual tool provides a means to consider the anticipated impact of potential RCS interventions in order to inform selection decisions (ie, which out of a number of potential RCS intervention options may be most impactful in a given setting given the intervention design and implementation challenges). The fourth and final tool is designed to support the evaluation of a collective RCS effort, whether that be multiple RCS interventions delivered within the context of a single or continuous programme or multiple RCS programmes delivered in a common setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8016073/ /pubmed/33789870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Practice
Pulford, Justin
Crossman, Susie
Abomo, Pierre
Amegee Quach, Jessica
Begg, Sara
Ding, Yan
El Hajj, Taghreed
Bates, Imelda
Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title_full Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title_fullStr Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title_full_unstemmed Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title_short Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
title_sort guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
topic Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005153
work_keys_str_mv AT pulfordjustin guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT crossmansusie guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT abomopierre guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT amegeequachjessica guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT beggsara guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT dingyan guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT elhajjtaghreed guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions
AT batesimelda guidanceandconceptualtoolstoinformthedesignselectionandevaluationofresearchcapacitystrengtheninginterventions