Cargando…
Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971 |
_version_ | 1783673783435919360 |
---|---|
author | Sterner Isaksson, Sofia Bensow Bacos, Margareta Eliasson, Björn Thors Adolfsson, Eva Rawshani, Araz Lindblad, Ulf Jendle, Johan Berglund, Agneta Lind, Marcus Axelsen, Mette |
author_facet | Sterner Isaksson, Sofia Bensow Bacos, Margareta Eliasson, Björn Thors Adolfsson, Eva Rawshani, Araz Lindblad, Ulf Jendle, Johan Berglund, Agneta Lind, Marcus Axelsen, Mette |
author_sort | Sterner Isaksson, Sofia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, diet quality and food choices in T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12 months randomized controlled study conducted at nine diabetes specialist centers with three parallel arms: (i) a food-based approach (FBA) including foods with low glycemic index or (ii) carbohydrate counting (CC) according to today’s standard practice or (iii) individual sessions according to routine care (RC). The primary end point was difference in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between groups at 12 months. RESULTS: 159 patients were randomized (FBA: 51; CC: 52; RC: 55). Mean (SD) age 48.6 (12.0) years, 57.9% females and mean (SD) HbA1c level 63.9 (7.9) mmol/mol, 8% (0.7%). After 3 months, HbA1c improved in both FBA and CC compared with RC. However, there were no significant differences at 12 months in HbA1c; FBA versus RC (−0.4 mmol/mol (1.3), 0.04% (0.1%)), CC versus RC (−0.8 mmol/mol (1.2), 0.1% (0.1%)), FBA versus CC (0.4 mmol/mol (0.3), 0.04% (0.01%)). At 12 months, intake of legumes, nuts and vegetables was improved in FBA versus CC and RC. FBA also reported higher intake of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with RC, and dietary fiber, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with CC (all p values <0.05). There were no differences in blood pressure levels, lipids, body weight or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education using an FBA, CC or RC is equivalent in terms of HbA1c and cardiovascular risk factors in persons with T1D with moderately impaired glycemic control. An FBA had benefits regarding food choices compared with CC and RC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8016079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80160792021-04-21 Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial Sterner Isaksson, Sofia Bensow Bacos, Margareta Eliasson, Björn Thors Adolfsson, Eva Rawshani, Araz Lindblad, Ulf Jendle, Johan Berglund, Agneta Lind, Marcus Axelsen, Mette BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical care/Education/Nutrition INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, diet quality and food choices in T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12 months randomized controlled study conducted at nine diabetes specialist centers with three parallel arms: (i) a food-based approach (FBA) including foods with low glycemic index or (ii) carbohydrate counting (CC) according to today’s standard practice or (iii) individual sessions according to routine care (RC). The primary end point was difference in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between groups at 12 months. RESULTS: 159 patients were randomized (FBA: 51; CC: 52; RC: 55). Mean (SD) age 48.6 (12.0) years, 57.9% females and mean (SD) HbA1c level 63.9 (7.9) mmol/mol, 8% (0.7%). After 3 months, HbA1c improved in both FBA and CC compared with RC. However, there were no significant differences at 12 months in HbA1c; FBA versus RC (−0.4 mmol/mol (1.3), 0.04% (0.1%)), CC versus RC (−0.8 mmol/mol (1.2), 0.1% (0.1%)), FBA versus CC (0.4 mmol/mol (0.3), 0.04% (0.01%)). At 12 months, intake of legumes, nuts and vegetables was improved in FBA versus CC and RC. FBA also reported higher intake of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with RC, and dietary fiber, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with CC (all p values <0.05). There were no differences in blood pressure levels, lipids, body weight or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education using an FBA, CC or RC is equivalent in terms of HbA1c and cardiovascular risk factors in persons with T1D with moderately impaired glycemic control. An FBA had benefits regarding food choices compared with CC and RC. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8016079/ /pubmed/33789909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical care/Education/Nutrition Sterner Isaksson, Sofia Bensow Bacos, Margareta Eliasson, Björn Thors Adolfsson, Eva Rawshani, Araz Lindblad, Ulf Jendle, Johan Berglund, Agneta Lind, Marcus Axelsen, Mette Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title | Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title_full | Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title_short | Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
title_sort | effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial |
topic | Clinical care/Education/Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sternerisakssonsofia effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT bensowbacosmargareta effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT eliassonbjorn effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT thorsadolfssoneva effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT rawshaniaraz effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT lindbladulf effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT jendlejohan effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT berglundagneta effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT lindmarcus effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial AT axelsenmette effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial |