Cargando…

Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sterner Isaksson, Sofia, Bensow Bacos, Margareta, Eliasson, Björn, Thors Adolfsson, Eva, Rawshani, Araz, Lindblad, Ulf, Jendle, Johan, Berglund, Agneta, Lind, Marcus, Axelsen, Mette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971
_version_ 1783673783435919360
author Sterner Isaksson, Sofia
Bensow Bacos, Margareta
Eliasson, Björn
Thors Adolfsson, Eva
Rawshani, Araz
Lindblad, Ulf
Jendle, Johan
Berglund, Agneta
Lind, Marcus
Axelsen, Mette
author_facet Sterner Isaksson, Sofia
Bensow Bacos, Margareta
Eliasson, Björn
Thors Adolfsson, Eva
Rawshani, Araz
Lindblad, Ulf
Jendle, Johan
Berglund, Agneta
Lind, Marcus
Axelsen, Mette
author_sort Sterner Isaksson, Sofia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, diet quality and food choices in T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12 months randomized controlled study conducted at nine diabetes specialist centers with three parallel arms: (i) a food-based approach (FBA) including foods with low glycemic index or (ii) carbohydrate counting (CC) according to today’s standard practice or (iii) individual sessions according to routine care (RC). The primary end point was difference in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between groups at 12 months. RESULTS: 159 patients were randomized (FBA: 51; CC: 52; RC: 55). Mean (SD) age 48.6 (12.0) years, 57.9% females and mean (SD) HbA1c level 63.9 (7.9) mmol/mol, 8% (0.7%). After 3 months, HbA1c improved in both FBA and CC compared with RC. However, there were no significant differences at 12 months in HbA1c; FBA versus RC (−0.4 mmol/mol (1.3), 0.04% (0.1%)), CC versus RC (−0.8 mmol/mol (1.2), 0.1% (0.1%)), FBA versus CC (0.4 mmol/mol (0.3), 0.04% (0.01%)). At 12 months, intake of legumes, nuts and vegetables was improved in FBA versus CC and RC. FBA also reported higher intake of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with RC, and dietary fiber, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with CC (all p values <0.05). There were no differences in blood pressure levels, lipids, body weight or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education using an FBA, CC or RC is equivalent in terms of HbA1c and cardiovascular risk factors in persons with T1D with moderately impaired glycemic control. An FBA had benefits regarding food choices compared with CC and RC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80160792021-04-21 Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial Sterner Isaksson, Sofia Bensow Bacos, Margareta Eliasson, Björn Thors Adolfsson, Eva Rawshani, Araz Lindblad, Ulf Jendle, Johan Berglund, Agneta Lind, Marcus Axelsen, Mette BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical care/Education/Nutrition INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the effects of structured nutrition education is weak in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) with moderately impaired glycemic control. Objective was to compare the effects of different types of nutrition education programs on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, diet quality and food choices in T1D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12 months randomized controlled study conducted at nine diabetes specialist centers with three parallel arms: (i) a food-based approach (FBA) including foods with low glycemic index or (ii) carbohydrate counting (CC) according to today’s standard practice or (iii) individual sessions according to routine care (RC). The primary end point was difference in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between groups at 12 months. RESULTS: 159 patients were randomized (FBA: 51; CC: 52; RC: 55). Mean (SD) age 48.6 (12.0) years, 57.9% females and mean (SD) HbA1c level 63.9 (7.9) mmol/mol, 8% (0.7%). After 3 months, HbA1c improved in both FBA and CC compared with RC. However, there were no significant differences at 12 months in HbA1c; FBA versus RC (−0.4 mmol/mol (1.3), 0.04% (0.1%)), CC versus RC (−0.8 mmol/mol (1.2), 0.1% (0.1%)), FBA versus CC (0.4 mmol/mol (0.3), 0.04% (0.01%)). At 12 months, intake of legumes, nuts and vegetables was improved in FBA versus CC and RC. FBA also reported higher intake of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with RC, and dietary fiber, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared with CC (all p values <0.05). There were no differences in blood pressure levels, lipids, body weight or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education using an FBA, CC or RC is equivalent in terms of HbA1c and cardiovascular risk factors in persons with T1D with moderately impaired glycemic control. An FBA had benefits regarding food choices compared with CC and RC. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8016079/ /pubmed/33789909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical care/Education/Nutrition
Sterner Isaksson, Sofia
Bensow Bacos, Margareta
Eliasson, Björn
Thors Adolfsson, Eva
Rawshani, Araz
Lindblad, Ulf
Jendle, Johan
Berglund, Agneta
Lind, Marcus
Axelsen, Mette
Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title_full Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title_fullStr Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title_short Effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
title_sort effects of nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting or routine care in type 1 diabetes: 12 months prospective randomized trial
topic Clinical care/Education/Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971
work_keys_str_mv AT sternerisakssonsofia effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT bensowbacosmargareta effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT eliassonbjorn effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT thorsadolfssoneva effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT rawshaniaraz effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT lindbladulf effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT jendlejohan effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT berglundagneta effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT lindmarcus effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT axelsenmette effectsofnutritioneducationusingafoodbasedapproachcarbohydratecountingorroutinecareintype1diabetes12monthsprospectiverandomizedtrial