Cargando…

Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. In many patients, a rate control strategy is recommended. The optimal heart rate target i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feinberg, Joshua Buron, Olsen, Michael Hecht, Brandes, Axel, Raymond, llan, Nielsen, Walter Bjørn, Nielsen, Emil Eik, Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank, Dixen, Ulrik, Pedersen, Ole Dyg, Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved, Gluud, Christian, Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744
_version_ 1783673784823185408
author Feinberg, Joshua Buron
Olsen, Michael Hecht
Brandes, Axel
Raymond, llan
Nielsen, Walter Bjørn
Nielsen, Emil Eik
Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank
Dixen, Ulrik
Pedersen, Ole Dyg
Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved
Gluud, Christian
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_facet Feinberg, Joshua Buron
Olsen, Michael Hecht
Brandes, Axel
Raymond, llan
Nielsen, Walter Bjørn
Nielsen, Emil Eik
Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank
Dixen, Ulrik
Pedersen, Ole Dyg
Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved
Gluud, Christian
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_sort Feinberg, Joshua Buron
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. In many patients, a rate control strategy is recommended. The optimal heart rate target is disputed despite the results of the the RAte Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between lenient vs strict rate control II (RACE II) trial. Our primary objective will be to investigate the effect of lenient rate control strategy (<110 beats per minute (bpm) at rest) compared with strict rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest) on quality of life in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan a two-group, superiority randomised clinical trial. 350 outpatients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation will be recruited from four hospitals, across three regions in Denmark. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to a lenient medical rate control strategy (<110 bpm at rest) or a strict medical rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest). The recruitment phase is planned to be 2 years with 3 years of follow-up. Recruitment is expected to start in January 2021. The primary outcome will be quality of life using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire (physical component score). Secondary outcomes will be days alive outside hospital, symptom control using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life, quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire (mental component score) and serious adverse events. The primary assessment time point for all outcomes will be 1 year after randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the ethics committee in Region Zealand. The design and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04542785.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80160862021-04-21 Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial Feinberg, Joshua Buron Olsen, Michael Hecht Brandes, Axel Raymond, llan Nielsen, Walter Bjørn Nielsen, Emil Eik Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank Dixen, Ulrik Pedersen, Ole Dyg Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved Gluud, Christian Jakobsen, Janus Christian BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. In many patients, a rate control strategy is recommended. The optimal heart rate target is disputed despite the results of the the RAte Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between lenient vs strict rate control II (RACE II) trial. Our primary objective will be to investigate the effect of lenient rate control strategy (<110 beats per minute (bpm) at rest) compared with strict rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest) on quality of life in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan a two-group, superiority randomised clinical trial. 350 outpatients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation will be recruited from four hospitals, across three regions in Denmark. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to a lenient medical rate control strategy (<110 bpm at rest) or a strict medical rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest). The recruitment phase is planned to be 2 years with 3 years of follow-up. Recruitment is expected to start in January 2021. The primary outcome will be quality of life using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire (physical component score). Secondary outcomes will be days alive outside hospital, symptom control using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life, quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire (mental component score) and serious adverse events. The primary assessment time point for all outcomes will be 1 year after randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the ethics committee in Region Zealand. The design and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04542785. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8016086/ /pubmed/33789853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Feinberg, Joshua Buron
Olsen, Michael Hecht
Brandes, Axel
Raymond, llan
Nielsen, Walter Bjørn
Nielsen, Emil Eik
Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank
Dixen, Ulrik
Pedersen, Ole Dyg
Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved
Gluud, Christian
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title_full Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title_short Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
title_sort lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the danish atrial fibrillation (danaf) randomised clinical trial
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744
work_keys_str_mv AT feinbergjoshuaburon lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT olsenmichaelhecht lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT brandesaxel lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT raymondllan lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nielsenwalterbjørn lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nielsenemileik lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT stensgaardhansenfrank lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT dixenulrik lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT pedersenoledyg lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT ganguffejakobortved lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT gluudchristian lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT jakobsenjanuschristian lenientratecontrolversusstrictratecontrolforatrialfibrillationaprotocolforthedanishatrialfibrillationdanafrandomisedclinicaltrial