Cargando…
Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567 |
_version_ | 1783673814760030208 |
---|---|
author | Gomes Freitas, Carolina Walsh, Michael Coutinho, Enia Lucia Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato Atallah, Álvaro Nagib |
author_facet | Gomes Freitas, Carolina Walsh, Michael Coutinho, Enia Lucia Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato Atallah, Álvaro Nagib |
author_sort | Gomes Freitas, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two generic versions of warfarin sodium tablets, manufactured by União Química and Teuto laboratories, all purchased from retail drugstores. Eligible participants were outpatients from an anticoagulation clinic at a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. They had atrial fibrillation or flutter and had been using warfarin for at least 2 months with an INR therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. Randomization was by numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Healthcare personnel and outcome assessors were blinded to treatments, but patients were not. The primary outcome was the variability in the INR (ΔINR) and secondary outcomes included mean INR. We accepted formulations as equivalent if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the comparison of ΔINR between branded and generic formulations was within the limit of ±0.49. RESULTS: One hundred patients were recruited and randomized to six sequences of treatment (four sequences with n = 17 and two sequences with n = 16). União Química generic warfarin had equivalent variability in the INR to Marevan (ΔINR +0.09 [95% CI -0.29 to +0.46], n = 84). Comparison between Teuto generic warfarin and Marevan was inconclusive (ΔINR +0.29 [95% CI -0.09 to +0.68], n = 84). CONCLUSIONS: Marevan and União Química warfarin had equivalent therapeutic effectiveness and both could be confidently used for anticoagulation. The comparison between Marevan and TW was inconclusive and does not warrant a statement of equivalence. Our methods are especially important for comparing generic and branded drugs that raise concerns and may be subject of future investigations by regulatory agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02017197. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8016229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80162292021-04-08 Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial Gomes Freitas, Carolina Walsh, Michael Coutinho, Enia Lucia Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato Atallah, Álvaro Nagib PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two generic versions of warfarin sodium tablets, manufactured by União Química and Teuto laboratories, all purchased from retail drugstores. Eligible participants were outpatients from an anticoagulation clinic at a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. They had atrial fibrillation or flutter and had been using warfarin for at least 2 months with an INR therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. Randomization was by numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Healthcare personnel and outcome assessors were blinded to treatments, but patients were not. The primary outcome was the variability in the INR (ΔINR) and secondary outcomes included mean INR. We accepted formulations as equivalent if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the comparison of ΔINR between branded and generic formulations was within the limit of ±0.49. RESULTS: One hundred patients were recruited and randomized to six sequences of treatment (four sequences with n = 17 and two sequences with n = 16). União Química generic warfarin had equivalent variability in the INR to Marevan (ΔINR +0.09 [95% CI -0.29 to +0.46], n = 84). Comparison between Teuto generic warfarin and Marevan was inconclusive (ΔINR +0.29 [95% CI -0.09 to +0.68], n = 84). CONCLUSIONS: Marevan and União Química warfarin had equivalent therapeutic effectiveness and both could be confidently used for anticoagulation. The comparison between Marevan and TW was inconclusive and does not warrant a statement of equivalence. Our methods are especially important for comparing generic and branded drugs that raise concerns and may be subject of future investigations by regulatory agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02017197. Public Library of Science 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016229/ /pubmed/33793580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567 Text en © 2021 Gomes Freitas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gomes Freitas, Carolina Walsh, Michael Coutinho, Enia Lucia Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato Atallah, Álvaro Nagib Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title | Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in brazil: the warfa crossover randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomesfreitascarolina examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT walshmichael examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT coutinhoenialucia examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vincenzodepaolaangeloamato examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT atallahalvaronagib examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial |