Cargando…

Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes Freitas, Carolina, Walsh, Michael, Coutinho, Enia Lucia, Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato, Atallah, Álvaro Nagib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567
_version_ 1783673814760030208
author Gomes Freitas, Carolina
Walsh, Michael
Coutinho, Enia Lucia
Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato
Atallah, Álvaro Nagib
author_facet Gomes Freitas, Carolina
Walsh, Michael
Coutinho, Enia Lucia
Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato
Atallah, Álvaro Nagib
author_sort Gomes Freitas, Carolina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two generic versions of warfarin sodium tablets, manufactured by União Química and Teuto laboratories, all purchased from retail drugstores. Eligible participants were outpatients from an anticoagulation clinic at a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. They had atrial fibrillation or flutter and had been using warfarin for at least 2 months with an INR therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. Randomization was by numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Healthcare personnel and outcome assessors were blinded to treatments, but patients were not. The primary outcome was the variability in the INR (ΔINR) and secondary outcomes included mean INR. We accepted formulations as equivalent if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the comparison of ΔINR between branded and generic formulations was within the limit of ±0.49. RESULTS: One hundred patients were recruited and randomized to six sequences of treatment (four sequences with n = 17 and two sequences with n = 16). União Química generic warfarin had equivalent variability in the INR to Marevan (ΔINR +0.09 [95% CI -0.29 to +0.46], n = 84). Comparison between Teuto generic warfarin and Marevan was inconclusive (ΔINR +0.29 [95% CI -0.09 to +0.68], n = 84). CONCLUSIONS: Marevan and União Química warfarin had equivalent therapeutic effectiveness and both could be confidently used for anticoagulation. The comparison between Marevan and TW was inconclusive and does not warrant a statement of equivalence. Our methods are especially important for comparing generic and branded drugs that raise concerns and may be subject of future investigations by regulatory agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02017197.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80162292021-04-08 Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial Gomes Freitas, Carolina Walsh, Michael Coutinho, Enia Lucia Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato Atallah, Álvaro Nagib PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the generic and branded warfarins used as anticoagulants in Brazil are therapeutic equivalents based on their international normalized ratio (INR) results. METHODS: This crossover randomized controlled trial had four periods. We used the branded Marevan and two generic versions of warfarin sodium tablets, manufactured by União Química and Teuto laboratories, all purchased from retail drugstores. Eligible participants were outpatients from an anticoagulation clinic at a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. They had atrial fibrillation or flutter and had been using warfarin for at least 2 months with an INR therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. Randomization was by numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Healthcare personnel and outcome assessors were blinded to treatments, but patients were not. The primary outcome was the variability in the INR (ΔINR) and secondary outcomes included mean INR. We accepted formulations as equivalent if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the comparison of ΔINR between branded and generic formulations was within the limit of ±0.49. RESULTS: One hundred patients were recruited and randomized to six sequences of treatment (four sequences with n = 17 and two sequences with n = 16). União Química generic warfarin had equivalent variability in the INR to Marevan (ΔINR +0.09 [95% CI -0.29 to +0.46], n = 84). Comparison between Teuto generic warfarin and Marevan was inconclusive (ΔINR +0.29 [95% CI -0.09 to +0.68], n = 84). CONCLUSIONS: Marevan and União Química warfarin had equivalent therapeutic effectiveness and both could be confidently used for anticoagulation. The comparison between Marevan and TW was inconclusive and does not warrant a statement of equivalence. Our methods are especially important for comparing generic and branded drugs that raise concerns and may be subject of future investigations by regulatory agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02017197. Public Library of Science 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016229/ /pubmed/33793580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567 Text en © 2021 Gomes Freitas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gomes Freitas, Carolina
Walsh, Michael
Coutinho, Enia Lucia
Vincenzo de Paola, Angelo Amato
Atallah, Álvaro Nagib
Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title_full Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title_short Examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in Brazil: The WARFA crossover randomized controlled trial
title_sort examining therapeutic equivalence between branded and generic warfarin in brazil: the warfa crossover randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33793580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248567
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesfreitascarolina examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT walshmichael examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coutinhoenialucia examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vincenzodepaolaangeloamato examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT atallahalvaronagib examiningtherapeuticequivalencebetweenbrandedandgenericwarfarininbrazilthewarfacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial