Cargando…

The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?

BACKGROUND: Medial knee deviation (MKD) during the single leg squat test (SLST) is a common clinical finding that is often attributed to impairments of proximal muscular structures. Investigations into the relationship between MKD and the foot and ankle complex have provided conflicting results, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Lindsay A, Kivlan, Benjamin R, Martin, RobRoy L, Phelps, Amy L, Carcia, Christopher R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842032
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21317
_version_ 1783673856150470656
author Carroll, Lindsay A
Kivlan, Benjamin R
Martin, RobRoy L
Phelps, Amy L
Carcia, Christopher R
author_facet Carroll, Lindsay A
Kivlan, Benjamin R
Martin, RobRoy L
Phelps, Amy L
Carcia, Christopher R
author_sort Carroll, Lindsay A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medial knee deviation (MKD) during the single leg squat test (SLST) is a common clinical finding that is often attributed to impairments of proximal muscular structures. Investigations into the relationship between MKD and the foot and ankle complex have provided conflicting results, which may impact clinicians’ interpretation of the SLST. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and foot posture in subjects that perform the SLST with MKD (fail) versus without MKD (pass). HYPOTHESIS: There will be a difference in ankle dorsiflexion ROM and/or foot posture between healthy individuals that pass and fail the SLST for MKD. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy, active volunteers (sex = 50 female, 15 male; age = 25.2 +/- 5.6 years; height = 1.7 +/- .1 m; weight = 68.5 +/- 13.5 kg) who demonstrated static balance and hip abductor strength sufficient for performance of the SLST participated in the study. Subjects were divided into pass and fail groups based on visual observation of MKD during the SLST. Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scores and measures of non-weight bearing and weight bearing active ankle dorsiflexion (ROM) were compared. RESULTS: There were 33 individuals in the pass group and 32 in the fail group. The groups were similar on age (p = .899), sex (p = .341), BMI (p = .818), and Tegner Activity Scale score (p = .456). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on the FPI-6 (pass group mean = 2.5 +/- 3.9; fail group mean = 2.3 +/- 3.5; p = .599), or any of the measures of dorsiflexion range of motion (non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee extended: pass group = 6.9(o) +/- 3.7(o), fail group = 7.8(o) +/- 3.0(o); non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee flexed: pass group = 13.5(o) +/- 5.6(o), fail group = 13.9(o) +/- 5.3(o); weight bearing dorsiflexion: pass group = 42.7(o) +/- 6.0(o), 42.7(o) +/- 8.3(o), p = .611). CONCLUSIONS: Failure on the SLST is not related to differences in clinical measures of active dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture in young, healthy individuals. These findings suggest that clinicians may continue using the SLST to assess neuromuscular performance of the trunk, hip, and knee without ankle dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture contributing to results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80164172021-04-08 The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test? Carroll, Lindsay A Kivlan, Benjamin R Martin, RobRoy L Phelps, Amy L Carcia, Christopher R Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Medial knee deviation (MKD) during the single leg squat test (SLST) is a common clinical finding that is often attributed to impairments of proximal muscular structures. Investigations into the relationship between MKD and the foot and ankle complex have provided conflicting results, which may impact clinicians’ interpretation of the SLST. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and foot posture in subjects that perform the SLST with MKD (fail) versus without MKD (pass). HYPOTHESIS: There will be a difference in ankle dorsiflexion ROM and/or foot posture between healthy individuals that pass and fail the SLST for MKD. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy, active volunteers (sex = 50 female, 15 male; age = 25.2 +/- 5.6 years; height = 1.7 +/- .1 m; weight = 68.5 +/- 13.5 kg) who demonstrated static balance and hip abductor strength sufficient for performance of the SLST participated in the study. Subjects were divided into pass and fail groups based on visual observation of MKD during the SLST. Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scores and measures of non-weight bearing and weight bearing active ankle dorsiflexion (ROM) were compared. RESULTS: There were 33 individuals in the pass group and 32 in the fail group. The groups were similar on age (p = .899), sex (p = .341), BMI (p = .818), and Tegner Activity Scale score (p = .456). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on the FPI-6 (pass group mean = 2.5 +/- 3.9; fail group mean = 2.3 +/- 3.5; p = .599), or any of the measures of dorsiflexion range of motion (non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee extended: pass group = 6.9(o) +/- 3.7(o), fail group = 7.8(o) +/- 3.0(o); non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee flexed: pass group = 13.5(o) +/- 5.6(o), fail group = 13.9(o) +/- 5.3(o); weight bearing dorsiflexion: pass group = 42.7(o) +/- 6.0(o), 42.7(o) +/- 8.3(o), p = .611). CONCLUSIONS: Failure on the SLST is not related to differences in clinical measures of active dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture in young, healthy individuals. These findings suggest that clinicians may continue using the SLST to assess neuromuscular performance of the trunk, hip, and knee without ankle dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture contributing to results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. NASMI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016417/ /pubmed/33842032 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21317 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carroll, Lindsay A
Kivlan, Benjamin R
Martin, RobRoy L
Phelps, Amy L
Carcia, Christopher R
The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title_full The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title_fullStr The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title_full_unstemmed The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title_short The Single Leg Squat Test: A “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” Functional Performance Test?
title_sort single leg squat test: a “top-down” or “bottom-up” functional performance test?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842032
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21317
work_keys_str_mv AT carrolllindsaya thesinglelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT kivlanbenjaminr thesinglelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT martinrobroyl thesinglelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT phelpsamyl thesinglelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT carciachristopherr thesinglelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT carrolllindsaya singlelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT kivlanbenjaminr singlelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT martinrobroyl singlelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT phelpsamyl singlelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest
AT carciachristopherr singlelegsquattestatopdownorbottomupfunctionalperformancetest