Cargando…

Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling

BACKGROUND: With the increased popularity of foam rolling (FR), it is important to establish the exact manner in which the practice is useful. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of FR the iliotibial (IT) band on hip adduction range of motion (ROM) and the short-term time co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Amico, Anthony, Silva, Kevin, Gallo, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842038
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21417
_version_ 1783673860147642368
author D’Amico, Anthony
Silva, Kevin
Gallo, Joseph
author_facet D’Amico, Anthony
Silva, Kevin
Gallo, Joseph
author_sort D’Amico, Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the increased popularity of foam rolling (FR), it is important to establish the exact manner in which the practice is useful. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of FR the iliotibial (IT) band on hip adduction range of motion (ROM) and the short-term time course of any ROM changes that may occur. METHOD: In a within-subject design, 34 subjects (21 female, 13 male) (female mean age 24.67 ± 8.6 yrs, height 161.4 ± 9.8 cm, mass 67.3 ± 12.3 kg; male mean age 22 ± 2.5 yrs, height 170.2 ± 8.2 cm, mass 76.3 ± 21.9 kg) underwent a baseline Ober’s test to measure hip adduction ROM prior to the FR and control conditions. Subjects rolled the lateral portion of each thigh for 3 bouts of 20 seconds. A tempo of 3 seconds down and 3 seconds up the leg was maintained across FR bouts. A 5-minute walk served as the control condition. The Ober’s test was repeated at less than 1 minute, 3 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes following the FR bouts and the control to assess changes in hip adduction ROM over time. A blinded clinician conducted the Ober’s test. A two-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences by condition and time. RESULTS: No differences in hip adduction ROM were found at baseline between FR and CON within subjects (27.9 cm ± 7.5 vs. 27.7 cm ± 6.6, p > .05). Ober’s test ROM was significantly greater in FR compared to CON immediately post-treatment (24.2 cm ± 6.3 vs. 28.2 cm ± 6.3, p = .00, d = .59), and 3 minutes post (24.6 cm ± 7.6 vs. 28.3 cm ± 5.9, p = .00, d = .56). No differences were observed 10 minutes post, 15 minutes post, or 20 minutes post FR or CON (p > .05). DISCUSSION: Compared to walking, FR the IT band significantly increased hip adduction ROM as measured by the Ober’s test. These increases appear to dissipate between 3 and 10 minutes post-FR. CONCLUSION: An acute bout of 3 sets of 20 seconds of FR may be effective for transiently increasing ROM. Whether these short-term increases have implications for chronic flexibility changes is unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80164342021-04-08 Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling D’Amico, Anthony Silva, Kevin Gallo, Joseph Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: With the increased popularity of foam rolling (FR), it is important to establish the exact manner in which the practice is useful. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of FR the iliotibial (IT) band on hip adduction range of motion (ROM) and the short-term time course of any ROM changes that may occur. METHOD: In a within-subject design, 34 subjects (21 female, 13 male) (female mean age 24.67 ± 8.6 yrs, height 161.4 ± 9.8 cm, mass 67.3 ± 12.3 kg; male mean age 22 ± 2.5 yrs, height 170.2 ± 8.2 cm, mass 76.3 ± 21.9 kg) underwent a baseline Ober’s test to measure hip adduction ROM prior to the FR and control conditions. Subjects rolled the lateral portion of each thigh for 3 bouts of 20 seconds. A tempo of 3 seconds down and 3 seconds up the leg was maintained across FR bouts. A 5-minute walk served as the control condition. The Ober’s test was repeated at less than 1 minute, 3 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and 20 minutes following the FR bouts and the control to assess changes in hip adduction ROM over time. A blinded clinician conducted the Ober’s test. A two-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences by condition and time. RESULTS: No differences in hip adduction ROM were found at baseline between FR and CON within subjects (27.9 cm ± 7.5 vs. 27.7 cm ± 6.6, p > .05). Ober’s test ROM was significantly greater in FR compared to CON immediately post-treatment (24.2 cm ± 6.3 vs. 28.2 cm ± 6.3, p = .00, d = .59), and 3 minutes post (24.6 cm ± 7.6 vs. 28.3 cm ± 5.9, p = .00, d = .56). No differences were observed 10 minutes post, 15 minutes post, or 20 minutes post FR or CON (p > .05). DISCUSSION: Compared to walking, FR the IT band significantly increased hip adduction ROM as measured by the Ober’s test. These increases appear to dissipate between 3 and 10 minutes post-FR. CONCLUSION: An acute bout of 3 sets of 20 seconds of FR may be effective for transiently increasing ROM. Whether these short-term increases have implications for chronic flexibility changes is unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 NASMI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016434/ /pubmed/33842038 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21417 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Research
D’Amico, Anthony
Silva, Kevin
Gallo, Joseph
Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title_full Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title_fullStr Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title_full_unstemmed Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title_short Time Course of Acute Hip Adduction Range of Motion Changes Following Foam Rolling
title_sort time course of acute hip adduction range of motion changes following foam rolling
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842038
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21417
work_keys_str_mv AT damicoanthony timecourseofacutehipadductionrangeofmotionchangesfollowingfoamrolling
AT silvakevin timecourseofacutehipadductionrangeofmotionchangesfollowingfoamrolling
AT gallojoseph timecourseofacutehipadductionrangeofmotionchangesfollowingfoamrolling