Cargando…

Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength

BACKGROUND: Knee flexion strength may hold important clinical implications for the determination of injury risk and readiness to return to sport following injury and orthopedic surgery. A wide array of testing methodologies and positioning options are available that require validation prior to clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogborn, Dan I, Bellemare, Alix, Bruinooge, Brittany, Brown, Holly, McRae, Sheila, Leiter, Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842031
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21311
_version_ 1783673862995574784
author Ogborn, Dan I
Bellemare, Alix
Bruinooge, Brittany
Brown, Holly
McRae, Sheila
Leiter, Jeff
author_facet Ogborn, Dan I
Bellemare, Alix
Bruinooge, Brittany
Brown, Holly
McRae, Sheila
Leiter, Jeff
author_sort Ogborn, Dan I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knee flexion strength may hold important clinical implications for the determination of injury risk and readiness to return to sport following injury and orthopedic surgery. A wide array of testing methodologies and positioning options are available that require validation prior to clinical integration. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate the validity and test-retest reliability of isometric knee flexion strength measured by a fixed handheld dynamometer (HHD) apparatus compared to a Biodex Dynamometer (BD), 2) determine the impact of body position (seated versus supine) and foot position (plantar- vs dorsiflexed) on knee flexion peak torque and 3) establish the validity and test-retest reliability of the NordBord Hamstring Dynamometer. STUDY DESIGN: Validity and reliability study, test-retest design. METHODS: Forty-four healthy participants (aged 27 ± 4.8 years) were assessed by two raters over two testing sessions separated by three to seven days. Maximal isometric knee flexion in the seated and supine position at 90(o) knee flexion was measured with both a BD and an externally fixed HHD with the foot held in maximal dorsiflexion or in plantar flexion. The validity and test-retest reliability of eccentric knee flexor strength on the NordBord hamstring dynamometer was assessed and compared with isometric strength on the BD. RESULTS: Level of agreement between HHD and BD torque demonstrated low bias (bias -0.33 Nm, SD of bias 13.5 Nm; 95% LOA 26.13 Nm, -26.79 Nm). Interrater reliability of the HHD was high, varying slightly with body position (ICC range 0.9-0.97, n=44). Isometric knee flexion torque was higher in the seated versus supine position and with the foot dorsiflexed versus plantarflexed. Eccentric knee flexion torque had a high degree of correlation with isometric knee flexion torque as measured via the BD (r=0.61-0.86). The NordBord had high test-retest reliability (0.993 (95%CI 0.983-0.997, n=19) for eccentric knee flexor strength, with an MDC(95) of 26.88 N and 28.76 N for the left and right limbs respectively. CONCLUSION: Common measures of maximal isometric knee flexion display high levels of correlation and test-retest reliability. However, values obtained by an externally fixed HHD are not interchangeable with values obtained via the BD. Foot and body position should be considered and controlled during testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80164472021-04-08 Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength Ogborn, Dan I Bellemare, Alix Bruinooge, Brittany Brown, Holly McRae, Sheila Leiter, Jeff Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Knee flexion strength may hold important clinical implications for the determination of injury risk and readiness to return to sport following injury and orthopedic surgery. A wide array of testing methodologies and positioning options are available that require validation prior to clinical integration. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate the validity and test-retest reliability of isometric knee flexion strength measured by a fixed handheld dynamometer (HHD) apparatus compared to a Biodex Dynamometer (BD), 2) determine the impact of body position (seated versus supine) and foot position (plantar- vs dorsiflexed) on knee flexion peak torque and 3) establish the validity and test-retest reliability of the NordBord Hamstring Dynamometer. STUDY DESIGN: Validity and reliability study, test-retest design. METHODS: Forty-four healthy participants (aged 27 ± 4.8 years) were assessed by two raters over two testing sessions separated by three to seven days. Maximal isometric knee flexion in the seated and supine position at 90(o) knee flexion was measured with both a BD and an externally fixed HHD with the foot held in maximal dorsiflexion or in plantar flexion. The validity and test-retest reliability of eccentric knee flexor strength on the NordBord hamstring dynamometer was assessed and compared with isometric strength on the BD. RESULTS: Level of agreement between HHD and BD torque demonstrated low bias (bias -0.33 Nm, SD of bias 13.5 Nm; 95% LOA 26.13 Nm, -26.79 Nm). Interrater reliability of the HHD was high, varying slightly with body position (ICC range 0.9-0.97, n=44). Isometric knee flexion torque was higher in the seated versus supine position and with the foot dorsiflexed versus plantarflexed. Eccentric knee flexion torque had a high degree of correlation with isometric knee flexion torque as measured via the BD (r=0.61-0.86). The NordBord had high test-retest reliability (0.993 (95%CI 0.983-0.997, n=19) for eccentric knee flexor strength, with an MDC(95) of 26.88 N and 28.76 N for the left and right limbs respectively. CONCLUSION: Common measures of maximal isometric knee flexion display high levels of correlation and test-retest reliability. However, values obtained by an externally fixed HHD are not interchangeable with values obtained via the BD. Foot and body position should be considered and controlled during testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b NASMI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016447/ /pubmed/33842031 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21311 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. If you remix, transform, or build upon this work, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ogborn, Dan I
Bellemare, Alix
Bruinooge, Brittany
Brown, Holly
McRae, Sheila
Leiter, Jeff
Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title_full Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title_fullStr Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title_short Comparison of Common Methodologies for the Determination of Knee Flexor Muscle Strength
title_sort comparison of common methodologies for the determination of knee flexor muscle strength
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842031
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.21311
work_keys_str_mv AT ogborndani comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength
AT bellemarealix comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength
AT bruinoogebrittany comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength
AT brownholly comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength
AT mcraesheila comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength
AT leiterjeff comparisonofcommonmethodologiesforthedeterminationofkneeflexormusclestrength