Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are 2 mainstream treatments for displaced femoral neck fracture, including internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, there are still some controversial problems as to which treatment should be primarily chosen. METHODS: The relevant studies comparing arthroplasty with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000087 |
_version_ | 1783673894630064128 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Junhao Wang, Guoqi Li, Jia Wang, Song Li, Miao Yin, Xiaohong Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu |
author_facet | Deng, Junhao Wang, Guoqi Li, Jia Wang, Song Li, Miao Yin, Xiaohong Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu |
author_sort | Deng, Junhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, there are 2 mainstream treatments for displaced femoral neck fracture, including internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, there are still some controversial problems as to which treatment should be primarily chosen. METHODS: The relevant studies comparing arthroplasty with internal fixation were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Finally, 31 relevant randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. We also assessed the heterogeneity among studies and publication bias via the I-squared index and forest plots. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation groups in patient mortality at both short-term and long-term points. However, patients treated with arthroplasty showed significantly lowered risks of reoperation both at short-term (5.6% vs 31.5%; relative risks (RR) = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13–0.28; P < .00001) and long-term follow-up (9.5% vs 45.9%; RR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.33; P < .00001). Similarly, arthroplasty-treated patients demonstrated a significant decrease in the risk of postoperation complications at short-term (10.3% vs 34.4%; RR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24–0.57; P < .00001) and long-term follow-up (11.7% vs 42.5%; RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.16–0.57; P < .0002). Besides, patients in the arthroplasty group were associated with better alleviation of pain postoperation (18.3% vs 31.1%; RR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.33–0.78; P = .002). In trial sequence analyses, all cumulative Z curves except that of mortality crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundaries and conventional boundaries, and required information size has been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty leads to a lower rate of reoperation, a reduced risk of complications, and a better alleviation of postoperation pain both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Most importantly, and according to trial sequence analyses, more than enough evidence has been achieved that arthroplasty does show better outcomes than internal fixation in terms of reoperation rate, complications, and postoperation pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8016607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80166072021-04-29 A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures Deng, Junhao Wang, Guoqi Li, Jia Wang, Song Li, Miao Yin, Xiaohong Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu OTA Int Systematic Review Article BACKGROUND: Currently, there are 2 mainstream treatments for displaced femoral neck fracture, including internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, there are still some controversial problems as to which treatment should be primarily chosen. METHODS: The relevant studies comparing arthroplasty with internal fixation were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Finally, 31 relevant randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. We also assessed the heterogeneity among studies and publication bias via the I-squared index and forest plots. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation groups in patient mortality at both short-term and long-term points. However, patients treated with arthroplasty showed significantly lowered risks of reoperation both at short-term (5.6% vs 31.5%; relative risks (RR) = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13–0.28; P < .00001) and long-term follow-up (9.5% vs 45.9%; RR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.33; P < .00001). Similarly, arthroplasty-treated patients demonstrated a significant decrease in the risk of postoperation complications at short-term (10.3% vs 34.4%; RR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24–0.57; P < .00001) and long-term follow-up (11.7% vs 42.5%; RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.16–0.57; P < .0002). Besides, patients in the arthroplasty group were associated with better alleviation of pain postoperation (18.3% vs 31.1%; RR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.33–0.78; P = .002). In trial sequence analyses, all cumulative Z curves except that of mortality crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundaries and conventional boundaries, and required information size has been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty leads to a lower rate of reoperation, a reduced risk of complications, and a better alleviation of postoperation pain both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Most importantly, and according to trial sequence analyses, more than enough evidence has been achieved that arthroplasty does show better outcomes than internal fixation in terms of reoperation rate, complications, and postoperation pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8016607/ /pubmed/33937715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000087 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Article Deng, Junhao Wang, Guoqi Li, Jia Wang, Song Li, Miao Yin, Xiaohong Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures |
topic | Systematic Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengjunhao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT wangguoqi asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT lijia asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT wangsong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT limiao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT yinxiaohong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT zhanglicheng asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT tangpeifu asystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT dengjunhao systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT wangguoqi systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT lijia systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT wangsong systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT limiao systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT yinxiaohong systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT zhanglicheng systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures AT tangpeifu systematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingarthroplastyandinternalfixationinthetreatmentofelderlydisplacedfemoralneckfractures |