Cargando…

Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation

PURPOSE: In September 2015, the first and so far only medication for treatment of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) was approved in the EU. The drug in question is idebenone (©Raxone) and has been given to all newly diagnosed patients of the University Eye Hospital Tuebingen since the appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonagel, Felix, Wilhelm, Helmut, Richter, Paul, Kelbsch, Carina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-05045-4
_version_ 1783673923449126912
author Tonagel, Felix
Wilhelm, Helmut
Richter, Paul
Kelbsch, Carina
author_facet Tonagel, Felix
Wilhelm, Helmut
Richter, Paul
Kelbsch, Carina
author_sort Tonagel, Felix
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In September 2015, the first and so far only medication for treatment of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) was approved in the EU. The drug in question is idebenone (©Raxone) and has been given to all newly diagnosed patients of the University Eye Hospital Tuebingen since the approval of the drug. The aim of the study was to find out whether regular administration of the drug led to an improvement in vision. We retrospectively examined 2 cohorts of consecutive patients with newly occurred visual impairment and LHON diagnosis: One with the initial diagnosis made from January 2010 until April 2014 and a second from October 2015 until January 2020. METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study. All electronic medical files of newly diagnosed and genetically confirmed LHON patients of the University Eye Hospital Tuebingen from January 2010 until April 2014 (cohort 1) and October 2015 until January 2020 (cohort 2) with at least 12 months of follow-up examinations have been analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients were included in the first and 7 patients in the second cohort. Patients of cohort 1 received no medication; patients of cohort 2, a daily dose of 900 mg idebenone. The primary visual acuity (VA) ranged between 0.03 and 0.5 in cohort 1 and did not improve during the observation period (median 60 months, range 23–87 months). The patients of cohort 2 have been observed for a median of 23 months (range 12–35 m). The primary VA ranged from 0.01 to 0.16. A recovery in one or both eyes with a final VA from 0.8 to 1.0 was experienced in 3 out of 7 patients. All patients showing a recovery of VA carried the m.11778G>A mutation. CONCLUSION: The observed improvement in the treated cohort may be considered as a hint on the efficacy of idebenone in LHON. The time course of improvement suggests that idebenone should be given 1.5 years in newly diagnosed LHON cases. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80167772021-04-16 Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation Tonagel, Felix Wilhelm, Helmut Richter, Paul Kelbsch, Carina Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Neuro-Ophthalmology PURPOSE: In September 2015, the first and so far only medication for treatment of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) was approved in the EU. The drug in question is idebenone (©Raxone) and has been given to all newly diagnosed patients of the University Eye Hospital Tuebingen since the approval of the drug. The aim of the study was to find out whether regular administration of the drug led to an improvement in vision. We retrospectively examined 2 cohorts of consecutive patients with newly occurred visual impairment and LHON diagnosis: One with the initial diagnosis made from January 2010 until April 2014 and a second from October 2015 until January 2020. METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study. All electronic medical files of newly diagnosed and genetically confirmed LHON patients of the University Eye Hospital Tuebingen from January 2010 until April 2014 (cohort 1) and October 2015 until January 2020 (cohort 2) with at least 12 months of follow-up examinations have been analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients were included in the first and 7 patients in the second cohort. Patients of cohort 1 received no medication; patients of cohort 2, a daily dose of 900 mg idebenone. The primary visual acuity (VA) ranged between 0.03 and 0.5 in cohort 1 and did not improve during the observation period (median 60 months, range 23–87 months). The patients of cohort 2 have been observed for a median of 23 months (range 12–35 m). The primary VA ranged from 0.01 to 0.16. A recovery in one or both eyes with a final VA from 0.8 to 1.0 was experienced in 3 out of 7 patients. All patients showing a recovery of VA carried the m.11778G>A mutation. CONCLUSION: The observed improvement in the treated cohort may be considered as a hint on the efficacy of idebenone in LHON. The time course of improvement suggests that idebenone should be given 1.5 years in newly diagnosed LHON cases. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8016777/ /pubmed/33337510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-05045-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neuro-Ophthalmology
Tonagel, Felix
Wilhelm, Helmut
Richter, Paul
Kelbsch, Carina
Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title_full Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title_fullStr Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title_full_unstemmed Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title_short Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
title_sort leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy: course of disease in consideration of idebenone treatment and type of mutation
topic Neuro-Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-05045-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tonagelfelix lebershereditaryopticneuropathycourseofdiseaseinconsiderationofidebenonetreatmentandtypeofmutation
AT wilhelmhelmut lebershereditaryopticneuropathycourseofdiseaseinconsiderationofidebenonetreatmentandtypeofmutation
AT richterpaul lebershereditaryopticneuropathycourseofdiseaseinconsiderationofidebenonetreatmentandtypeofmutation
AT kelbschcarina lebershereditaryopticneuropathycourseofdiseaseinconsiderationofidebenonetreatmentandtypeofmutation