Cargando…

Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Ayoung, Kwon, Hyunggoo, Jeon, Sohee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5
_version_ 1783673937226366976
author Choi, Ayoung
Kwon, Hyunggoo
Jeon, Sohee
author_facet Choi, Ayoung
Kwon, Hyunggoo
Jeon, Sohee
author_sort Choi, Ayoung
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8016841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80168412021-04-05 Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length Choi, Ayoung Kwon, Hyunggoo Jeon, Sohee Sci Rep Article The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8016841/ /pubmed/33795724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Ayoung
Kwon, Hyunggoo
Jeon, Sohee
Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_full Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_fullStr Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_short Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_sort accuracy of theoretical iol formulas for panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8016841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5
work_keys_str_mv AT choiayoung accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength
AT kwonhyunggoo accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength
AT jeonsohee accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength