Cargando…

Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study

OBJECTIVES: Progressive resistance training can successfully target functional decline in healthy older community-dwelling adults. There are concerns about the safety and acceptance of its use in frail older populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using progressive resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, Sinéad A., Cunningham, Conal J., Murphy, Niamh, Feaheny, Jean, Robinson, David, Lannon, Rosaleen, McCarroll, Kevin, Casey, Miriam, Harbison, Joseph, Horgan, N. Frances
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817447
http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-014
_version_ 1783674048943751168
author Coleman, Sinéad A.
Cunningham, Conal J.
Murphy, Niamh
Feaheny, Jean
Robinson, David
Lannon, Rosaleen
McCarroll, Kevin
Casey, Miriam
Harbison, Joseph
Horgan, N. Frances
author_facet Coleman, Sinéad A.
Cunningham, Conal J.
Murphy, Niamh
Feaheny, Jean
Robinson, David
Lannon, Rosaleen
McCarroll, Kevin
Casey, Miriam
Harbison, Joseph
Horgan, N. Frances
author_sort Coleman, Sinéad A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Progressive resistance training can successfully target functional decline in healthy older community-dwelling adults. There are concerns about the safety and acceptance of its use in frail older populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using progressive resistance training in an older, post-acute, inpatient setting. METHODS: A randomised controlled feasibility study was conducted. Appropriate older inpatients undergoing post-acute rehabilitation were recruited. Feasibility measures examined were safety, recruitment, outcome measurement, adherence and retention rates and satisfaction. A range of clinical measures were used to capture changes in body structure and function, activity and participation. Assessments were performed on admission to the study and six weeks later. RESULTS: A sample of 33 patients were included and randomised to the treatment group (n=16) or the control group (n=17). There were no serious adverse events, adherence rates were 63% and retention rates were 82%. While both groups improved between time 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in clinical measures between the groups. CONCLUSION: Progressive resistance training is a safe and acceptable intervention for use with this population. Further work on the effectiveness of progressive resistance training in this setting is now required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8017350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80173502021-04-02 Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study Coleman, Sinéad A. Cunningham, Conal J. Murphy, Niamh Feaheny, Jean Robinson, David Lannon, Rosaleen McCarroll, Kevin Casey, Miriam Harbison, Joseph Horgan, N. Frances J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls Original Article OBJECTIVES: Progressive resistance training can successfully target functional decline in healthy older community-dwelling adults. There are concerns about the safety and acceptance of its use in frail older populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using progressive resistance training in an older, post-acute, inpatient setting. METHODS: A randomised controlled feasibility study was conducted. Appropriate older inpatients undergoing post-acute rehabilitation were recruited. Feasibility measures examined were safety, recruitment, outcome measurement, adherence and retention rates and satisfaction. A range of clinical measures were used to capture changes in body structure and function, activity and participation. Assessments were performed on admission to the study and six weeks later. RESULTS: A sample of 33 patients were included and randomised to the treatment group (n=16) or the control group (n=17). There were no serious adverse events, adherence rates were 63% and retention rates were 82%. While both groups improved between time 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in clinical measures between the groups. CONCLUSION: Progressive resistance training is a safe and acceptable intervention for use with this population. Further work on the effectiveness of progressive resistance training in this setting is now required. HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8017350/ /pubmed/33817447 http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-014 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Hylonome Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 All published work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International
spellingShingle Original Article
Coleman, Sinéad A.
Cunningham, Conal J.
Murphy, Niamh
Feaheny, Jean
Robinson, David
Lannon, Rosaleen
McCarroll, Kevin
Casey, Miriam
Harbison, Joseph
Horgan, N. Frances
Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title_full Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title_fullStr Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title_short Progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: A randomised controlled feasibility study
title_sort progressive resistance training in a post-acute, older, inpatient setting: a randomised controlled feasibility study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817447
http://dx.doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-014
work_keys_str_mv AT colemansineada progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT cunninghamconalj progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT murphyniamh progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT feahenyjean progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT robinsondavid progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT lannonrosaleen progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT mccarrollkevin progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT caseymiriam progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT harbisonjoseph progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT horgannfrances progressiveresistancetraininginapostacuteolderinpatientsettingarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy